Flagpole wrote:
Duane wrote:
Here is a real life example of this. I voted for Dukakis and I think Clinton twice. This past year even tho Trump is an ass there is no way I would vote for either Hillary or Bernie. Would have preferred a different R candidate, but did not have that option.
Ok, so what do you think of your vote today? Any regrets?
He has been defending Trump. Who he says is an ass.
Racket wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
A lot of young voters start as Democrat supporters and as they grow older shift towards a more conservative viewpoint and end up becoming old Republican supporters.
Also old people vote at a much higher %.
The biggest demographic issue moving forward is the increasing minority vote. By 2050 white folks will be under 50% of the population.
Alan
Once you get a job and look at pay stubs you start to realize that free healthcare and free college has to be paid for by someone so I think a lot of middle class people are drawn to a more fiscally conservative agenda (which is not what the Republican party even is anymore). Does that outweigh the batsh!t crazy socially conservative positions the Republican party still champions though?
You did not mention military spending which is the #1 taker of taxpayer money.
beat you over 8 laps Steve:) wrote:
And Who RU? wrote:
Then post your using your regular name. If you cannot do that then you are making something up … pulling it out of your ass.
I tell ya what big guy. You post your real name, email address, etc...and I'll happily post my real name. Deal?
I live in Michigan. I lived in Ohio during my youth, including High School. I graduated in 84'.
Steve and I were in different counties, but I beat him good at 3200 meters. Steve and you can both post your real names. I know his but I won't do that to him, he can do it on his own. He is what others call a blowhard and so are you. Don't call people out without doing what you ask of them first..pulling it out your ass.
You graduated in '84? That would make you 52 years old now. Your posts sound like someone who is currently 17 years old.
I hesitate to believe it wrote:
beat you over 8 laps Steve:) wrote:
I tell ya what big guy. You post your real name, email address, etc...and I'll happily post my real name. Deal?
I live in Michigan. I lived in Ohio during my youth, including High School. I graduated in 84'.
Steve and I were in different counties, but I beat him good at 3200 meters. Steve and you can both post your real names. I know his but I won't do that to him, he can do it on his own. He is what others call a blowhard and so are you. Don't call people out without doing what you ask of them first..pulling it out your ass.
You graduated in '84? That would make you 52 years old now. Your posts sound like someone who is currently 17 years old.
Hardloper, of the jaminLoper team, is the one who claims Flagpole is some guy named Steve.
Flagpole wrote:
FSKey wrote:
One key fact missing from your post, Flagpole.
Hill and Thomas both worked for the Federal Government at the time of the allegation. THAT is why the FBI was directed to investigate.
^This is a fact.
Wasn't me, brother.
WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!
It was obviously you, brother. Sh!t. Half the trolling posts on here are you. You're not fooling anyone.
He is jaminloper wrote:
I hesitate to believe it wrote:
You graduated in '84? That would make you 52 years old now. Your posts sound like someone who is currently 17 years old.
Hardloper, of the jaminLoper team, is the one who claims Flagpole is some guy named Steve.
^Flagpole, again.
Hello there wrote:
He is jaminloper wrote:
Hardloper, of the jaminLoper team, is the one who claims Flagpole is some guy named Steve.
^Flagpole, again.
JaminLoper are easily triggered.
“Let that sink in. Trump's campaign chairman is GUILTY of CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.”
No regrets, things would be better without tweets. Policies would be far worse with Hillary, as would be the economy.
1100 wrote:
“Let that sink in. Trump's campaign chairman is GUILTY of CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.”
The dude that worked for Trump for 100 days? He also is set to implicate John Podesta and expose Hillary's corruption (which the whole world knows about anyway).
FUN FACT: On election day 2016, stocks dropped 900 points when it looked like Hillary was going to win, then gained 400 when Trump won. LESSON: the economy hates Socialists.
Have a great day!
Obvis wrote:
Obvi wrote:
Attempted rape should disqualify anyone from EVER serving on the SCOTUS. To think otherwise is to trivialize the crime or to dishonor the SCOTUS. Possibly both.
Sorry, but it really is that simple.
How would this make a difference in his job performance?
How would someone having murdered someone make a difference in their job performance?
Sorry, but your question is staggeringly stupid.
Duane wrote:
No regrets, things would be better without tweets. Policies would be far worse with Hillary, as would be the economy.
You are wrong about your last two "claims."
Democrats are violent fascists wrote:
FUN FACT: Republicans are violent racists!
Have a great day!
True for sure
The hyphenated hillary loving piece of trash who is falsely accusing Kavanaugh is a total piece of trash.
The hyphenated trump loving piece of trash who is correctly knows Kavanaugh is a total piece of trash.
It is more of an opinion than a fact. So it can't be wrong. For one thing, it is impossible to know (even by you genius!) how things would be in the alternative scenario of Hillary having won. Think about that.
Now, let's not stoop to Hillary's level. Remember what she said about $100 bills and trailer parks.
You know you've lost wrote:
[quote]You know you've lost wrote:
Hillary's thief days are numbered.
^ Sorry. I needed to fix my post.
1100 wrote:
“Let that sink in. Clinton's campaign chairman is GUILTY of CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.”
Agreed. Podesta has been accused of some sick things indeed! He's a freak!
Duane wrote:
It is more of an opinion than a fact. So it can't be wrong. For one thing, it is impossible to know (even by you genius!) how things would be in the alternative scenario of Hillary having won. Think about that.
Since "it is impossible to know (even by you genius!) how things would be in the alternative scenario of Hillary having won" it is very odd that someone (trying to remember who exactly) stated in very clear terms "how things would be in the alternative scenario of Hillary having won."
Think about that.