Why do you lie about easily proven things. I just do not understand that mentality.
you’ve been called out on this before. Your two articles are misquoting the actually DOJ report. An educated person would go right to the DOJ report and read what was said instead of believe opinions piece.
Simply put, the report found that no undercover FBI employees were at the riot on Jan. 6 and that none of the bureau's informants were authorized to participate. Informants, also known as confidential human sources, work with the FBI to provide information, but are not on the bureau’s payroll. Undercover agents are employed by the FBI.
17 Informants did enter unauthorized areas one entered the capital. NONE were authorized to be there.
At least read the report that your two articles are mischaracterizing before coming on here and lying about the report.
Why do you lie about easily proven things. I just do not understand that mentality.
you’ve been called out on this before. Your two articles are misquoting the actually DOJ report. An educated person would go right to the DOJ report and read what was said instead of believe opinions piece.
Simply put, the report found that no undercover FBI employees were at the riot on Jan. 6 and that none of the bureau's informants were authorized to participate. Informants, also known as confidential human sources, work with the FBI to provide information, but are not on the bureau’s payroll. Undercover agents are employed by the FBI.
17 Informants did enter unauthorized areas one entered the capital. NONE were authorized to be there.
At least read the report that your two articles are mischaracterizing before coming on here and lying about the report.
And you buy that self serving propaganda.
None? Good God
Show evidence that FBI agents instigated anything at January 6th. You cannot.
So, let me get this straight. The FBI had some field agents in the crowd and that proves:
1) The FBI organized and led the whole thing
2) There was no violence from the crowd
Are those your arguments?
Or is it that the FBI, when confronted with a situation that might be problematic and/or lead to violence, should stay away and mind their own damned business?
Do tell, what is "bad" about the FBI having agents interspersed amount the crowd? Would they be doing a better job by covering their eyes and ears?
It is really sickening that the Biden/Harris was allowed to lie to the American people about so many things over the last 4 years. Feels really exhilarating throwing out the trash, i.ie., the former administration.
CIA releases new analysis on COVID origins favoring lab leak theory
Columnist David Marcus, writing from Asheville, N.C., says the city's hardcore liberals seem to acknowledge that President Trump can be a lot more help than his predecessor in the wake of Hurricane Helene.
Handcuffs are off border patrol and ICE, they are doing work. Hard work, fired up, hard work. Watch out criminals, the free ride is Over. If Boston was a look at their strategy only the unhinged would be against it. haitian illegal, 18 charges on his sheet. Gone! ms13 gang members. Gone! sexual deviants. Gone! See ya. California has plenty of people like this, they are very welcoming to "newcomers" and soft on crime.
Agip spins some fanciful tales in his fact-free posts.
Odd that not one of you clowns is ever able to refute anything agip posts.
Seems like that would be easy to do if his posts were "fact-free".
Too difficult for you?
Baghdad agip posted this all-time gem on another thread:
"the chinese, russians and the GOP are flooding the battlefield with complete lies about Joe's mental capacity. Dems can't just cede that to the other side. Dems need a way to show Joe is fine. Debates are the highest visibility way to do so. Could crack through to the key independents that Joe is fine, their job is safe, their 401k is going to the moon and Joe is not Trump.
Odd that not one of you clowns is ever able to refute anything agip posts.
Seems like that would be easy to do if his posts were "fact-free".
Too difficult for you?
Baghdad agip posted this all-time gem on another thread:
"the chinese, russians and the GOP are flooding the battlefield with complete lies about Joe's mental capacity. Dems can't just cede that to the other side. Dems need a way to show Joe is fine. Debates are the highest visibility way to do so. Could crack through to the key independents that Joe is fine, their job is safe, their 401k is going to the moon and Joe is not Trump.
You lose.
Agip said for 4 years the southern border was 100% secure. 15 million illegals later, you might want to say he was wrong on that.
So, let me get this straight. The FBI had some field agents in the crowd and that proves:
1) The FBI organized and led the whole thing
2) There was no violence from the crowd
Are those your arguments?
Or is it that the FBI, when confronted with a situation that might be problematic and/or lead to violence, should stay away and mind their own damned business?
Do tell, what is "bad" about the FBI having agents interspersed amount the crowd? Would they be doing a better job by covering their eyes and ears?
Just for the record, there were zero FBI agents at J6. Zero FBI agents. Don’t say there were any.
there were something like 17 informants. Informants are Unpaid sources who let law enforcement know what is going on in violent outlaw radical Trumpist organizations.
This post was edited 42 seconds after it was posted.
President Trump's approval rating is still under water, but I'll be interested to see what effect this peripatetic week has on it. We'll have a better idea in a few days.
So, let me get this straight. The FBI had some field agents in the crowd and that proves:
1) The FBI organized and led the whole thing
2) There was no violence from the crowd
Are those your arguments?
Or is it that the FBI, when confronted with a situation that might be problematic and/or lead to violence, should stay away and mind their own damned business?
Do tell, what is "bad" about the FBI having agents interspersed amount the crowd? Would they be doing a better job by covering their eyes and ears?
Just for the record, there were zero FBI agents at J6. Zero FBI agents. Don’t say there were any.
there were something like 17 informants. Informants are Unpaid sources who let law enforcement know what is going on in violent outlaw radical Trumpist organizations.
So, let me get this straight. The FBI had some field agents in the crowd and that proves:
1) The FBI organized and led the whole thing
2) There was no violence from the crowd
Are those your arguments?
Or is it that the FBI, when confronted with a situation that might be problematic and/or lead to violence, should stay away and mind their own damned business?
Do tell, what is "bad" about the FBI having agents interspersed amount the crowd? Would they be doing a better job by covering their eyes and ears?
The argument is that this was a protest, not an insurrection, and the FBI was there to gin up violence from the crowd. And that nearly all the violence came from the cops like it always does at any protest.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote: Trump's mass deportations are in play. Cry more, libs Promises made. Promises kept.
----------------------------------------------
Really?
Trump to Tax Americans, and Stop Importing Fruit and Coffee from, and Stop Selling American Wheat to, Columbia after Trump Deportation Flights are Turned Away!