betting odds are around 50/50 for a confirmed Kav by Oct 31.
would not want to be susan collins right now.
That's October, not September.
betting odds are around 50/50 for a confirmed Kav by Oct 31.
would not want to be susan collins right now.
That's October, not September.
Duane wrote:
Why do I think she is wrong? Because I do not think she is lying, just mistaken about who did it. Because per people who knew him then what she says about him being drunk and out of control is totally out of character. Because she cannot recall more details about that day, such as where it was and even what year it was.
Why is she required to be "mistaken" in your world? Why couldn't Kavanaugh be the one who "mistakenly" tried to undress her and grind away? Because per people that "know" him cannot possible know, or vouch, for him. Their personal opinions of Kavanaugh have absolutely no bearing on this situation.
while I'm at it, trump revealing classified information about an ongoing investigation of himself is about the clearest example of abuse of power I can think of.
the idiot trumpers saying 'hey, just lie back and think of the economy' are basically traitors. Not legally, but they are aiding and abetting the enemies of democracy.
Grammar Police wrote:
"Ha! Which alias."
Please tell us the thousands of handle you have used, Rigged by JaminLoper, on just this thread.
Trollminator wrote:
Duane wrote:
considered, fine. But without any proof, an unsubstantiated 36 year old allegation ruining someone's life. What he says should be considered as well. Find me the 4th person at this party that will say Kavanaugh was there, and I will give the accusation more credence. Kavanaugh says he was not even at this "party" of 4, whenever it occurred which the woman making the allegation that is was Kavanaugh does not recall.
When you are being considered for SCJ, that’s what you can expect to go through. He knew that and he surely knew that any skeletons in the closet may pop out. He will have his say and a decision will be made.
The 65 women who came to the support of Kavanaugh immediately after the allegation went public tells you that this sexual attack was discussed by the Trump "team" before it became public. Kavanaugh was prepared for this. Why so?
Flagpole wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
You mean serve out his term and retire early - not removed from job. He may step down but they won’t remove him. Plus he is presumably a smart guy - he’s not going to lie, he’s going to dance around the truth under oath if he’s guilty. I could be wrong about that, given his record.
If he did this, he will have to lie at this point. They can and will ask very pointed questions that he will not be able to dance around. He has already gone all in on this. He will lie to his grave (if he did indeed do this).
He won't lie in the legal sense of perjury. He will "not recall" any relevant details and give non-answers to pointed questions as he did in the previous hearings. Pretty much any lawyer or politician, excepting Trump, is capable of doing this.
Trumpettes are NOT Americans!
Con-numb-drum wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I'm not in this to educate ALL the stupid people in the world. The answer is there. Not my fault that you are self-described stupid.
Towering Trump -
As you can see Flagpole has a conundrum. First, he has already gone all in on this thread that the meeting at Trump Tower proves collusion. However, now he's been confronted with his idol Bob Woodward saying that he never found any evidence of collusion after "looking hard" for it for two years.
Woodward must have had, at a minimum, the information about the meeting discussed by the media (Flagpole's level of knowledge) in addition to his own research. You would think that Woodward ("looking hard" for collusion) would pick the low hanging fruit of the Trump Tower meeting. Unless, of course, that he found that the meeting, in fact, did not meet the standards for collusion.
Then we have Lisa Page. She presents him with the same problem. An avid anti-Trumper who is charged with investigating whether Trump colluded with Russia before she was let go. Again, you would think that she would choose the low hanging fruit of the Trump Tower meeting to easily prove collusion. Yet, for some reason, she didn't.
No. You will not get an answer from Flagpole. It would force him to give the biggest mea culpa in history. We will be gracious to him though when he does.
Ha! Ha! Ha!
Dude, question has been answered by me. You cling to hope that Trump is an innocent guy. He's not.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Democrats lose again
agip wrote:
betting odds are around 50/50 for a confirmed Kav by Oct 31.
would not want to be susan collins right now.
That's October, not September.
Betting is low class.
Democrats lose again wrote:
Democrats lose again
No vote for Kavanugh on Thursday as planned. Is that what Trumpers consider a "win"?
Ride The Pony wrote:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-penis-looks-like-toad-from-mario-kart-says-stormy-daniels
Yet she decided to take a ride on it?
Monkeys typing wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
If he did this, he will have to lie at this point. They can and will ask very pointed questions that he will not be able to dance around. He has already gone all in on this. He will lie to his grave (if he did indeed do this).
He won't lie in the legal sense of perjury. He will "not recall" any relevant details and give non-answers to pointed questions as he did in the previous hearings. Pretty much any lawyer or politician, excepting Trump, is capable of doing this.
He has categorically denied that this happened and has said he wasn't even at the party. I will be shocked if he does the "do not recall" bit, and if he does that, he's done. He is all in and must state that either she is flat out lying or has him confused with someone else. He will state clearly and unequivocally that he did not do this.
With any luck, the Dems will find a way to stop Kavanaugh for the time being, then re-take the Senate and sit on ANY nominee until the election in 2020. Why not? It's what the Republicans have done, and would do.
agip wrote:
while I'm at it, trump revealing classified information about an ongoing investigation of himself is about the clearest example of abuse of power I can think of.
the idiot trumpers saying 'hey, just lie back and think of the economy' are basically traitors. Not legally, but they are aiding and abetting the enemies of democracy.
Or the transparency that Obama promised but never delivered.
Depends on which color glasses you are wearing.
Democrats lose again wrote:
Democrats lose again
Conservative lawyer whines Mueller’s carefully-worded Manafort deal makes it virtually impossible for Trump pardon
“What is most concerning to me is that Mr. Mueller, who is a part of the executive branch and is supposed to follow all of DOJ’s policies and procedures, is specifically seeking to impede the ability of the president to exercise his constitutional pardon authority,” said David Rivkin, a Justice Department official under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/18/manafort-deal-pardon-mueller-trump-827898Noticer of JaminLoper wrote:
Grammar Police wrote:
"Ha! Which alias."
Please tell us the thousands of handle you have used, Rigged by JaminLoper, on just this thread.
Hi Flagpole!
Flagpole wrote:
Con-numb-drum wrote:
Towering Trump -
As you can see Flagpole has a conundrum. First, he has already gone all in on this thread that the meeting at Trump Tower proves collusion. However, now he's been confronted with his idol Bob Woodward saying that he never found any evidence of collusion after "looking hard" for it for two years.
Woodward must have had, at a minimum, the information about the meeting discussed by the media (Flagpole's level of knowledge) in addition to his own research. You would think that Woodward ("looking hard" for collusion) would pick the low hanging fruit of the Trump Tower meeting. Unless, of course, that he found that the meeting, in fact, did not meet the standards for collusion.
Then we have Lisa Page. She presents him with the same problem. An avid anti-Trumper who is charged with investigating whether Trump colluded with Russia before she was let go. Again, you would think that she would choose the low hanging fruit of the Trump Tower meeting to easily prove collusion. Yet, for some reason, she didn't.
No. You will not get an answer from Flagpole. It would force him to give the biggest mea culpa in history. We will be gracious to him though when he does.
Ha! Ha! Ha!
Dude, question has been answered by me. You cling to hope that Trump is an innocent guy. He's not.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
I see what you mean now. He can't even answer a Yes/No question.
If he backs off from the specific denials he has already gone pubic with he is toast. He won't. No dancing. You may choose not to believe him. But then it would come down to "he said, she said". Is that the standard for being disqualified for a job, including the Supreme Court? If so, you can block anyone you like by accusing them of doing something they can't prove they did not do.