New distraction with tRump in New York City for the men's tennis 🎾 championship game holding up play.
Yep, play is delayed because they're having to check everyone's phone to make sure they haven't made any mean tweets or nasty memes, or mentioned that the Epstein List should be released.
Lolz
they delayed entry of the crowd so the stadium was 80% empty. This allowed them to get a camera shot of him waiving at nobody. Then he retreated to his skybox and fans were let in. All to avoid the loud booing and people sharing this videos to go viral.
More and more are calling out Trump and Hegseth blowing up a small boat premeditated murder. An act of war. The Trump admin is so incompetent that they don’t know the difference between lawful and illegal so they rushed out and broadcast this act to the world.
Here is an example of the BS
“That boat could not have possibly carried any drugs, certainly not bound to US ! Distance from Venezuela to the furthest south point of US - Keys West, is over 1,500 miles. That kind of speed boat can not make more than 300 miles without refueling, and at open sea no-one ever tries to go 100% of the distance, as getting stuck without gas in the middle of the ocean could be a death sentence. So, 250 miles is a reasonable max. travel distance. That tiny thing could never possibly make it to US. And on top of that, this was not a drug shipment. No drug trafficker ever, ever staff their boat with 13 people. Because they are always at risk of getting caught. So, the absolutely minimum number of handlers is always used, usually just two. Large cargo container ships have less than 13 crew members on board. And it is obvious the boat was almost empty, with only what looks like some back packs, or supply gear of some kind, food maybe. This was not just an act of war. This was an act of indiscriminate murder of some 13 civilians. Kind of what the same as what israel does every single day”.
Everyone wants the Hostages HOME. Everyone wants this War to end! The Israelis have accepted my Terms. It is time for Hamas to accept as well. I have warned Hamas about the consequences of not accepting. This is my last warning, there will not be another one! Thank you for your attention to this matter. DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
That’s weird he gave them a last warning in March.
1) I was stuck on "several" because, as near as I could tell, the Constitution does not seem to require signatures on anything but legislation--and it was you who said that the Constitution"does enumerate that a Presidential signature is required in several instances." Okay, what are a couple of them? And where does it say that? 2) Of course Biden was and is in decline, and that was and is "clear." But it's also the case that people in that kind of decline have good days and bad days, good spells and bad spells; anyone who's had to deal with such folks experiences this. So what is your specific "clear" evidence that Biden "did NOT personally approve hundreds of pardons"? 3) I have no reason to dispute the idea that President Trump's use of the autopen is and has been limited to things like low-level correspondence, and I did not dispute this previously.
PS--I actually don't follow this stuff closely--it's been a long time since my Con Law class--so I used the miracle of the Internet to call up the Constitution, and then used Ctrl + F to look for "sign" in the text. Took just about a minute. And I was able to use Google to find the memorandum from Bush the Younger's time. Took just about a minute. I included the references because I like to give people a way to check the support for my statements. I think that's better than making simple assertions and assuming that people will accept them without evidence.
Be well.
1) The real reason you're "stuck" on "several" is because you think if its not found in the Constitution it diminishes or renders the point that a POTUS signature is required on many documents invalid. In other words, its inconsequential so you have no good, legitimate reason to be stuck on it. Ironically and/or hypocritically, you use/accept a Bush-era DOJ opinion to validate your own point. If a Bush DOJ opinion is sufficient for you, then Biden's own executive staff specifically in charge of signatures should suffice.
Documents for YOUR Consideration, Approval, and Original Hand Signature
I count 14 documents Biden's own staff say require his "Original Hand Signature" as opposed to autopen, including "pardon letters". So, what is sticking you from accepting that? Because it contradicts your/the left's narrative that POTUS signatures are not required and it overlooks Biden/his staff's violating their own rules regarding the use of autopen.
The National Archives and Records Administration wrote:
we did not find specific meeting notes that clearly mention or note that the President was present
2) You're on the wrong side of this evidentiary requirement. It is YOU who must provide specific, clear evidence that Biden was present and individually approved every pardon and commutation. It is clear to all rational, sensible people that Biden did not and, indeed, could not have possibly individually reviewed and approved thousands of commutations and pardons in the time provided. According to Biden's Staff Memorandum: "it can often take days or weeks for the President to review and approve the clemency package." This was written in the first days of Biden's administration when at best they could assume there would be similar numbers to prior Presidents. It is clear to all rational people that Biden could not have reviewed over 4000 pardons and commutations in just 4 meetings (Dec 5 & 11 2024, Jan 11 & 19 2025). AND, there is evidence from the NARA he wasn't even present.
2b) You're being a hypocrite. One standard for me and another for thee. You wave your hand making a 'simple assertion and assumption' saying "good days and bad days, good spells and bad spells" as if that's good enough but I must have "specific clear evidence"? Wrong. According to your own standard, your 'good days/spells' statement has no support.
PS--As I already noted and you seemingly want to make abundantly clear, you could have found all the same info I just provided...but you willfully choose not to. You're trolling and/or being intellectually dishonest.
More and more are calling out Trump and Hegseth blowing up a small boat premeditated murder. An act of war. The Trump admin is so incompetent that they don’t know the difference between lawful and illegal so they rushed out and broadcast this act to the world.
Here is an example of the BS
“That boat could not have possibly carried any drugs, certainly not bound to US ! Distance from Venezuela to the furthest south point of US - Keys West, is over 1,500 miles. That kind of speed boat can not make more than 300 miles without refueling, and at open sea no-one ever tries to go 100% of the distance, as getting stuck without gas in the middle of the ocean could be a death sentence. So, 250 miles is a reasonable max. travel distance. That tiny thing could never possibly make it to US. And on top of that, this was not a drug shipment. No drug trafficker ever, ever staff their boat with 13 people. Because they are always at risk of getting caught. So, the absolutely minimum number of handlers is always used, usually just two. Large cargo container ships have less than 13 crew members on board. And it is obvious the boat was almost empty, with only what looks like some back packs, or supply gear of some kind, food maybe. This was not just an act of war. This was an act of indiscriminate murder of some 13 civilians. Kind of what the same as what israel does every single day”.
You sound like a drug trafficker, or at least a druggie sympathizer.
More and more are calling out Trump and Hegseth blowing up a small boat premeditated murder. An act of war. The Trump admin is so incompetent that they don’t know the difference between lawful and illegal so they rushed out and broadcast this act to the world.
Here is an example of the BS
“That boat could not have possibly carried any drugs, certainly not bound to US ! Distance from Venezuela to the furthest south point of US - Keys West, is over 1,500 miles. That kind of speed boat can not make more than 300 miles without refueling, and at open sea no-one ever tries to go 100% of the distance, as getting stuck without gas in the middle of the ocean could be a death sentence. So, 250 miles is a reasonable max. travel distance. That tiny thing could never possibly make it to US. And on top of that, this was not a drug shipment. No drug trafficker ever, ever staff their boat with 13 people. Because they are always at risk of getting caught. So, the absolutely minimum number of handlers is always used, usually just two. Large cargo container ships have less than 13 crew members on board. And it is obvious the boat was almost empty, with only what looks like some back packs, or supply gear of some kind, food maybe. This was not just an act of war. This was an act of indiscriminate murder of some 13 civilians. Kind of what the same as what israel does every single day”.
You sound like a drug trafficker, or at least a druggie sympathizer.
Anyway, the drugs may have been headed for the U.S. but the immediate destination was Trinidad and Tobago.
.@POTUS: "I think we're going to have a deal on Gaza very soon. It's a hell of a problem... I think we're going to get [all the hostages]." pic.twitter.com/KZmYAEFLQn
You sound like a drug trafficker, or at least a druggie sympathizer.
Anyway, the drugs may have been headed for the U.S. but the immediate destination was Trinidad and Tobago.
Not sure where you get that Trinadad and Tobago info.
Regardless of that, and assuming you are correct on that, do you think it is OK for the US to blow up a boat going from Venezuela to Trinidad and Tobago because there may havebeen drugs on the boat and, if there were drugs, they may have been headed to the US?
More and more are calling out Trump and Hegseth blowing up a small boat premeditated murder. An act of war. The Trump admin is so incompetent that they don’t know the difference between lawful and illegal so they rushed out and broadcast this act to the world.
Here is an example of the BS
“That boat could not have possibly carried any drugs, certainly not bound to US ! Distance from Venezuela to the furthest south point of US - Keys West, is over 1,500 miles. That kind of speed boat can not make more than 300 miles without refueling, and at open sea no-one ever tries to go 100% of the distance, as getting stuck without gas in the middle of the ocean could be a death sentence. So, 250 miles is a reasonable max. travel distance. That tiny thing could never possibly make it to US. And on top of that, this was not a drug shipment. No drug trafficker ever, ever staff their boat with 13 people. Because they are always at risk of getting caught. So, the absolutely minimum number of handlers is always used, usually just two. Large cargo container ships have less than 13 crew members on board. And it is obvious the boat was almost empty, with only what looks like some back packs, or supply gear of some kind, food maybe. This was not just an act of war. This was an act of indiscriminate murder of some 13 civilians. Kind of what the same as what israel does every single day”.
You sound like a drug trafficker, or at least a druggie sympathizer.
Anyway, the drugs may have been headed for the U.S. but the immediate destination was Trinidad and Tobago.
Not sure where you get that Trinadad and Tobago info.
Regardless of that, and assuming you are correct on that, do you think it is OK for the US to blow up a boat going from Venezuela to Trinidad and Tobago because there may havebeen drugs on the boat and, if there were drugs, they may have been headed to the US?
It is truly fucqued up that Trump will never be held accountable much less ever have to answer any questions for blowing up a boat of civilians on international waters.
Reminds me of Pooty blowing up a Commercial aircraft and getting zero pushback in Russia.
