Democrats lose again wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/17/senate-republicans-stick-with-thursday-kavanaugh-committee-vote/Suck on that, you Christian hating hillary loving pieces of trash.
I know it's shocking, but it looks like Breitbart got it wrong:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/17/politics/brett-kavanaugh-testimony/index.htmlFord and Kavanaugh to testify before Senate Judiciary committee next Monday, so no vote this Thursday.
Gyus wrote:
Personally, I love me some Flagpole.
He’s like the guy you make fun of who doesn’t know you’re making fun of him.
Then you tell him you’re making fun of him and he still doesn’t know.
Never change, brother.
Meh. I just don't give a sh!t.
Make America Great Again wrote:
George 0 wrote:
I don’t understand why neither Woodward nor Page consider the Trump Tower meeting collusion.
Because the Russian lawyer was only interested in talking about Magnitsky Act. "Dirt on Clinton" was just a means to get Jr. , Jared and Manafort to agree to a meeting. They quickly lost interest once they figured out she had nothing substantive to offer. The end of story.
This shows you don't know anything about anything. You should try another thread.
Alibi wrote:
Wibster wrote:
It seems very likely that Kavanaugh lied. But isn't it possible that he has no recollection of the event if he was very drunk at the time? I think it still should be enough to prevent his appointment even in this case. I just find it a bit odd that some people seem to acknowledge that he may not remember, but then go back to showing that he's been lying.
FYI. Being drunk is not an alibi for attempted rape of an underage girl.
I re-read my last sentence and realised I omitted a word (should have been "arguing it shows" rather than "showing", but I don't think it changes the meaning:
I just find it a bit odd that some people seem to acknowledge that he may not remember, but then go back to arguing it shows that he's been lying.
I'm not claiming it's an alibi (that's where you have evidence of being somewhere else). I'm saying that if he had no recollection of the event, was he really lying? It seems he did attempt rape or at least sexual assault. The question that remains is his probable lies about it.
It is called Google wrote:
M Jamal wrote:
Do you know that, or do you assume that? Did you know about the attempted rape? Maybe the alternatives had even more skeletons in their closets.
0/10
It has long been known that Trump has a LIST of SCOTUS candidates. Kavanaugh was on the list from the start.
"Despite speculation that Trump might consider other candidates for a possible second Supreme Court nomination, he [Trump] said in May 2017 that he would make his next appointment from the same list he used to choose Gorsuch."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_Supreme_Court_candidates
Gorsuch can't be nominated again. We don't know whether other candidates exist who have done less than Kavanaugh.
Nellie Ohr is going to testify outling the facts of Russian collusion. Delusional Dudley to report.
//
L.L wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Wait I forgot - Trollminator entered his daily shift for posting to himself - I’ll leave him to it.
Just bumping this on along for all the unstable and idiotic geniuses here. But odds are the Big K is going down.
Ms. Ford takes a polygraph and hires a lawyer in August but had no intention of going public until her identity was exposed. Is that so?
Flagpole wrote:
Make America Great Again wrote:
Because the Russian lawyer was only interested in talking about Magnitsky Act. "Dirt on Clinton" was just a means to get Jr. , Jared and Manafort to agree to a meeting. They quickly lost interest once they figured out she had nothing substantive to offer. The end of story.
This shows you don't know anything about anything. You should try another thread.
People like yourself resort to personal attacks when you have nothing of substance to write. How sad!
Make America Great Again wrote:
George 0 wrote:
I don’t understand why neither Woodward nor Page consider the Trump Tower meeting collusion.
Because the Russian lawyer was only interested in talking about Magnitsky Act. "Dirt on Clinton" was just a means to get Jr. , Jared and Manafort to agree to a meeting. They quickly lost interest once they figured out she had nothing substantive to offer. The end of story.
So Team Trump wanted to collude but the Russians wouldn't play ball? OK, if that's what you want to go with...
Oh, I forgot....waiting for Delusional Dudley to comment.
//
What is up with the // by the way?
bumping for idiots wrote:
L.L wrote:
Just bumping this on along for all the unstable and idiotic geniuses here. But odds are the Big K is going down.
Of course, I'm an idiot so how would I have a clue as to who is or isn't going down? I listen to Blowhard Flagpole, so that doesn't say a whole lot about my unstableness. Sorry, I forgot to put that part in there as I don't think so good.
johnny99 wrote:
Make America Great Again wrote:
Because the Russian lawyer was only interested in talking about Magnitsky Act. "Dirt on Clinton" was just a means to get Jr. , Jared and Manafort to agree to a meeting. They quickly lost interest once they figured out she had nothing substantive to offer. The end of story.
So Team Trump wanted to collude but the Russians wouldn't play ball? OK, if that's what you want to go with...
Yeah, like Uranium One and your girl Hillary. You voted for her, so you have to own it punk. What's wrong for one is bad for both, but you Liberal Dribble Morons want it both ways. NOPE!
Make America Great Again wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
This shows you don't know anything about anything. You should try another thread.
People like yourself resort to personal attacks when you have nothing of substance to write. How sad!
Flagpole has insecurity issue, bigly ones!:)
Hey, it's Lying Gary Lite!
How goes it, dude? Unable to control your own pollution? Remember, it was you who said that you'd keep your pollution off of this thread. Can't pass that off on anyone else.
///
Lying Gary Lite
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Ms. Ford takes a polygraph and hires a lawyer in August but had no intention of going public until her identity was exposed. Is that so?
Hey Lying Gary Lite! Remember when you came on this thread and tried to pretend that you were not a hard core Trumpette? That was sooooo cute! Absolutely adorable.
///
Lying Gary Lite
bumping for idiots wrote:
bumping for idiots wrote:
Just bumping this on along for all the unstable and idiotic geniuses here. But odds are the Big K is going down.
Of course, I'm an idiot so how would I have a clue as to who is or isn't going down? I listen to Blowhard Flagpole, so that doesn't say a whole lot about my unstableness. Sorry, I forgot to put that part in there as I don't think so good.
Not too original nor very bright. My guess Rigged or jaminloper.
Hey Dude! wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Ms. Ford takes a polygraph and hires a lawyer in August but had no intention of going public until her identity was exposed. Is that so?
Hey Lying Gary Lite! Remember when you came on this thread and tried to pretend that you were not a hard core Trumpette? That was sooooo cute! Absolutely adorable.
///
Lying Gary Lite
But we all knew that you are irrational and only see one side of an issue.
What is with the //? Seems weird, is that some symbol of deludion Dudley?
//?
Make America Great Again wrote:
SIgned by Obama wrote:
Ahem, the Magnitsky Act was signed by Obama. Also, the Russian government reportedly lobbied against the legislation acting through a public relations company led by Kenneth Duberstein (Regan's Chief of Staff). And finally, Natalia Veselnitskaya (who met with Don Jr), who was hired to lobby against the Magnitsky Act.
Nothing you wrote contradicts with my post. Veselnitskaya must have thought there was no chance that Clinton would overturn Magnitsky Act. So the only candidate she could lobby was Trump. But his campaign would not agree to meet her if she told them her real purpose. So she promised "dirt on Clinton" that she did not deliver.
Because nothing came out of the meeting, there was no conspiracy or "collusion."
I posted facts you can Google for yourself. You posted "might" "no chance" "would not" "real purpose". You made a YUGE number of guesses in two sentences.
You post is worthless.
Flagpole wrote:
Gyus wrote:
Personally, I love me some Flagpole.
He’s like the guy you make fun of who doesn’t know you’re making fun of him.
Then you tell him you’re making fun of him and he still doesn’t know.
Never change, brother.
Meh. I just don't give a sh!t.
Yes you do.