try again, trump wrote:
2nd Thoughts wrote:
Having second thoughts about Kavanaugh:
Susan Collins
Jeff Flake
That is two. Two is not enough to make it to 50 votes. More second thought Republicans to come out in the next few days.
Indeed. The floodgates have opened. Trump's pick is dead in the water.
But The Corrupt Witch LOST, so we're good. How are you doing? November 2016 still sting? Ouch!
Maybe Trump will nominate M. Garland. I’ve heard he’s a good judge and rather moderate.
try again, hillary wrote:
try again, trump wrote:
Indeed. The floodgates have opened. Trump's pick is dead in the water.
But The Corrupt Witch LOST, so we're good. How are you doing? November 2016 still sting? Ouch!
Don't post when you're drunk, brah.
Handle_stealer_the_real_1 wrote:
Maybe Trump will nominate M. Garland. I’ve heard he’s a good judge and rather moderate.
Nope. He should nominate H. Clinton to get back at the republicans who would not vote in the guy he failed to properly vet.
dont post drunk wrote:
try again, hillary wrote:
But The Corrupt Witch LOST, so we're good. How are you doing? November 2016 still sting? Ouch!
Don't post when you're drunk, brah.
but I'm drunk, so who cares?
Diehard Trumper Tomi Lahren, of Fox News, said tonight: "All democrats are trying to do is make an association from Russia to the GOP to confuse stupid people."
Yes, she called Trumper voters "stupid people.'
Democrats lose again wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/16/exclusive-classmate-named-in-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accusations-stands-by-denial-of-absolutely-nuts-allegations/Democrats are fairies
Breitbart!?! LOL!!!!!!
Democrats lose again wrote:
www breitbart ...
A completely worthless of a post.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://mobile.twitter.com/alexhamilton74/status/1041417856896905217
Hey, it's Lying Gary Lite! How goes it, Lying Gary Lite? I mean, besides posting standard Trumpette talking points.
So, you decided to live up to your name, Lying Gary Lite and not stand by your own word to limit your pollution to the Dow thread? Not a surprise. Liars gonna lie.
///
Lying Gary Lite
Democrats lose again wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/16/exclusive-classmate-named-in-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accusations-stands-by-denial-of-absolutely-nuts-allegations/Democrats are fairies
Wait, so the other guy who attacked the victim is denying that it happened? What a surprise! That is certainly compelling evidence that it never happened. Sure as heck convinces me.
Tomi says . . . wrote:
Diehard Trumper Tomi Lahren, of Fox News, said tonight: "All democrats are trying to do is make an association from Russia to the GOP to confuse stupid people."
Yes, she called Trumper voters "stupid people.'
That's hilarious.
A Fox Trumpette being honest in the only way they can be - accidentally!
What the What wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
This was from when he was in high school right? I really dont see how this matters.
Convince me otherwise.
Alan
I can hardly believe you are being serious.
I don't know what happened and it is unlikely that definitive "proof" will be shown.
BUT to even think about putting an attempted rapist on the SCOTUS is incomprehensible. How could anyone even contemplate for one second doing so?
When less well-connected young men do crimes like this, they are often charged as adults in this country. And if they're black, people call them thugs. But a white guy does it and you shrug your shoulders. Kind of like how the Stanford swimmer got let off easily.
Look into what his friend wrote about high school. They're basically drinking all the time. And then the friend blamed it on gay and liberal priests. It would have been funny if the Dems had asked if he drank in high school (sure everybody does it). Just to see how he would answer that one.
thug justice wrote:
It would have been funny if the Dems had asked if he drank in high school (sure everybody does it).
WTF HS did you go to? No, MOST high schoolers do not get sh!t faced drunk and try to rape a girl while drunk.
Tomi 2 Nuts wrote:
Tomi says . . . wrote:
Diehard Trumper Tomi Lahren, of Fox News, said tonight: "All democrats are trying to do is make an association from Russia to the GOP to confuse stupid people."
Yes, she called Trumper voters "stupid people.'
That's hilarious.
A Fox Trumpette being honest in the only way they can be - accidentally!
It does make you wonder how many of the Fox talking heads are simply bad actors.
Runningart2004 is right wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) It is 2018 now, and we have hit a new level of acceptability, unfortunately after Trump began his term. Matters not what Thomas and Clinton got away with. Time to put that crap to the garbage heap.
2) Democrats need to stop? Stop wanting a candidate to be fully vetted? His behavior (his gambling, his sexual assault accusation) is fair game and should be looked at carefully.
You are exhibiting old thinking on this issue and are just wrong.
Nope, you voted for her.
You had no issues with her failures and lies and deny them to this day.
To not fully admit flat out that Hillary and Bill were lying crooks says a lot about you, which is why you rarely get the responses that you're looking for. Believe me, if she had been honest and not done the things she had, I would have voted for her.
Bill's sexual trysts. Hillary and the complaints on her by female interns. You don't get to say fake news when the person is right there in flesh and blood stating what she did. But...you never addressed those as it's too close to home, right? You merely want your candidate to win.
This is why you get flack and can't understand the manner of responses that you get. You do care and want it, which is why you post so frequently.
Go ahead and laugh, it won't bother me in the least.
But, I agree with your statement of "unfortunately after Trump began his term."
This thread will never be civil and you are a big reason why. You post links that you claim as gospel and anyone else's link is lies by garbage sources, but not yours. Flip it and imagine being on the other side.
Alan is a lot smarter than you think he is. I've never met him, but I'll put him at age 67...and I'm not guaranteeing it.
1) Dude, you should let Alan try to fight his own battles, because you did a horrible job.
2) When referring to "Clinton", I was clearly referring to BILL Clinton not Hillary. You must be a young blood. I lost respect for Bill Clinton a long time ago and have said so here many times.
3) Hillary Clinton has been investigated to the teeth. There were 8 different Benghazi investigations. Nothing came from any of them. If you believe she has gotten away with a crime, go hire a lawyer and go after her. Until then, you can't say she's a criminal...there is nothing legitimate out there that supports that at all. Is she flawed? Yep. I have said that a hundred times. She was just a better candidate than Trump. Not a high bar, because he is an imbecile.
4) I don't say "fake news". I don't use terms used by Trump and his dunderhead followers.
5) My issue with Trump is not because he beat the candidate I voted for (halfheartedly voted for too by the way...she was just better than Trump). My issue is that he is a criminal and all the other things I mention in point 7 below...a list that is not exhaustive either.
6) I rarely post links, so what are you talking about? I also never have said anything that anyone else has said is gospel. Do you know how to read? How is your comprehension? Not everyone is good at that. Maybe you are a numbers person. Maybe you are good with shapes. Words are not your thing.
7) Why would I have to imagine being on the other side? So, imagine or flat out supporting an amoral, unethical person? Sorry...I would never do that. The other side (Trump and his supporters) is just flat wrong. Trump is a serial liar, a criminal, a racist, incompetent, and he has tons of people around him who have been charged with felonies and many others being investigated. He will go down and then be seen by history as the most corrupt politician in the US ever.
8) I never questioned Alan's intelligence. He hasn't shown me that he is all that intelligent, but I didn't question it. I said simply that his opinion on this particular issue is wrong...because it is. He has been right about other things. He's not right here.
Runningart2004 wrote:
They had no cajones.
Did you mean "cojones" here? Trying to understand how this sentence fits with the rest of what you wrote...even if it is "cojones."
I notice that people occasionally refer to handle thefts on this thread.
Remember that Rigged for Hillary was outed for that, some weeks or months back--though I seriously doubt that RFH is the only one.
Okay, carry on.
Handle_stealer_the_real_1 wrote:
Maybe Trump will nominate M. Garland. I’ve heard he’s a good judge and rather moderate.
Not only that: He was a U.S. Presidential Scholar as a high schooler and thus perforce unusually intelligent and quite good looking.