DC’s cleaning crews cover around 81 miles/day for around $150K/day. National Guard has cleaned a total of 3.2 miles and costs more than $1M/day. It’s about 170X more cost efficient per mile to fund DC’s existing work.
We promised that they’d get to protect their country and their communities, and we HAVE to keep that promise, no matter the cost.
DC’s cleaning crews cover around 81 miles/day for around $150K/day. National Guard has cleaned a total of 3.2 miles and costs more than $1M/day. It’s about 170X more cost efficient per mile to fund DC’s existing work.
We promised that they’d get to protect their country and their communities, and we HAVE to keep that promise, no matter the cost.
…plus, it’s best to do it in camo, as it allows you to sneak up on the trash without being seen.
BREAKING: The DOJ is SUING Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker for providing tuition benefits and financial aid to illegal aliens attending the state’s public universities and community colleges
On correspondence NOT on legally binding documents. The difference is critical which makes the criticism valid.
The Constitution does enumerate that a Presidential signature is required in several instances. The controversy exists over its use for pardons because those are a personal decision but it is clear that Biden did NOT personally approve hundreds of pardons.
Hmm. You're clearly capable of researching things so the only explanation is you're purposefully distorting and distracting which exposes you as dishonest. Example: you claim you don't follow this stuff closely yet reference Article and Section and a link to an Office of Legal Counsel opinion. That's no "quick re-check". Also, a "RE-check" implies you have previously followed this closely. With that established... 1) You do not honestly believe the President's signature is not required on any document but this is what you're implying with "only [legislation] requires a POTUS's signature". An HONEST "quick re-check" would have revealed that a Presidential signature is required for bills, joint resolutions, executive orders and proclamations. That's several. But we all know you weren't honestly "stuck" on "several". 2) Before I provide sources and argumentation proving it is clear, was it clear to you that Biden was/is in cognitive decline? If not then I'd be wasting my time on someone willing to deny what is obvious and clear. You're too smart to be gullible so that won't work as an excuse.
3) The point that Trump only used autopen on inconsequential correspondence remains valid and in contradiction to the prior commentary you're conveniently overlooking.
Hmm. You're clearly capable of researching things so the only explanation is you're purposefully distorting and distracting which exposes you as dishonest. Example: you claim you don't follow this stuff closely yet reference Article and Section and a link to an Office of Legal Counsel opinion. That's no "quick re-check". Also, a "RE-check" implies you have previously followed this closely. With that established... 1) You do not honestly believe the President's signature is not required on any document but this is what you're implying with "only [legislation] requires a POTUS's signature". An HONEST "quick re-check" would have revealed that a Presidential signature is required for bills, joint resolutions, executive orders and proclamations. That's several. But we all know you weren't honestly "stuck" on "several". 2) Before I provide sources and argumentation proving it is clear, was it clear to you that Biden was/is in cognitive decline? If not then I'd be wasting my time on someone willing to deny what is obvious and clear. You're too smart to be gullible so that won't work as an excuse.
3) The point that Trump only used autopen on inconsequential correspondence remains valid and in contradiction to the prior commentary you're conveniently overlooking.
1) I was stuck on "several" because, as near as I could tell, the Constitution does not seem to require signatures on anything but legislation--and it was you who said that the Constitution"does enumerate that a Presidential signature is required in several instances." Okay, what are a couple of them? And where does it say that? 2) Of course Biden was and is in decline, and that was and is "clear." But it's also the case that people in that kind of decline have good days and bad days, good spells and bad spells; anyone who's had to deal with such folks experiences this. So what is your specific "clear" evidence that Biden "did NOT personally approve hundreds of pardons"? 3) I have no reason to dispute the idea that President Trump's use of the autopen is and has been limited to things like low-level correspondence, and I did not dispute this previously.
PS--I actually don't follow this stuff closely--it's been a long time since my Con Law class--so I used the miracle of the Internet to call up the Constitution, and then used Ctrl + F to look for "sign" in the text. Took just about a minute. And I was able to use Google to find the memorandum from Bush the Younger's time. Took just about a minute. I included the references because I like to give people a way to check the support for my statements. I think that's better than making simple assertions and assuming that people will accept them without evidence.
Earlier this morning, on my Orders, U.S. Military Forces conducted a kinetic strike against positively identified Tren de Aragua Narcoterrorists in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility. TDA is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, operating under the control of Nicolas Maduro, responsible for mass murder, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and acts of violence and terror across the United States and Western Hemisphere. The strike occurred while the terrorists were at sea in International waters transporting illegal narcotics, heading to the United States. The strike resulted in 11 terrorists killed in action. No U.S. Forces were harmed in this strike. Please let this serve as notice to anybody even thinking about bringing drugs into the United States of America. BEWARE! Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!!!!!!!!!
Earlier this morning, on my Orders, U.S. Military Forces conducted a kinetic strike against positively identified Tren de Aragua Narcoterrorists in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility. TDA is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, operating under the control of Nicolas Maduro, responsible for mass murder, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and acts of violence and terror across the United States and Western Hemisphere. The strike occurred while the terrorists were at sea in International waters transporting illegal narcotics, heading to the United States. The strike resulted in 11 terrorists killed in action. No U.S. Forces were harmed in this strike. Please let this serve as notice to anybody even thinking about bringing drugs into the United States of America. BEWARE! Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!!!!!!!!!
Whoa! Well that should definitely distract people from those pesky EPSTEIN FILES.
Earlier this morning, on my Orders, U.S. Military Forces conducted a kinetic strike against positively identified Tren de Aragua Narcoterrorists in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility. TDA is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, operating under the control of Nicolas Maduro, responsible for mass murder, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and acts of violence and terror across the United States and Western Hemisphere. The strike occurred while the terrorists were at sea in International waters transporting illegal narcotics, heading to the United States. The strike resulted in 11 terrorists killed in action. No U.S. Forces were harmed in this strike. Please let this serve as notice to anybody even thinking about bringing drugs into the United States of America. BEWARE! Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!!!!!!!!!
Extremely conservative fifth circuit concludes the obvious, we’re not being invaded by Venezuela so the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 can’t be used to deport Venezuelans. Trump-appointed judge tries to argue that laws don’t apply to Trump, but fails.
