Buckeye Proud wrote:
non Flagpole wrote:
Wait, didn't Hillary say she was against Gay marriage, agree that a barrier/wall should be put up and the tax payers should have to pay for it ?
^ I fixed that for you.
Yep, thanks for fixing it and stating facts about your corrupt girl.
The major correction, possible crash is coming wrote:
Some may try and use tax or economic arguments but everyone knows the current economic gains are temporary and that the tax cuts will be bigly bad long term.
The game the fake Republicans in Congress are playing is this. They know their tax giveaway is a disaster. They know it has to be fixed by increasing taxes. They know they will lose control for the three branches of government. They know Democrats will increase taxes to erase their tax giveaway. Republicans will then claim: Democrats must be removed from office because they increase taxes, while Republicans decrease taxes.
Flagpole wrote:
inferred wrote:
You are an idiot.
To imply is to express something indirectly.
To infer is to surmise or conclude, especially from indirect evidence.
I know the meaning of the word. I used it to mean exactly that.
You got schooled STEVE, you have no clue how to use the words. Stay in your Ohio trailer park, please don't think of moving West, you couldn't handle it.
Buckeye Proud wrote:
A very stabie genius! wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a67JYMhZe7gYep, this is what Fat Hurts, LL, agip and their leader Flagpole voted for.
Thanks voters who made the difference in Michigan, Florida, and OHIO!!!! Love me some OHIO!!!!
This is typical of Trumpers. Point to a video of Hillary where someone else provides the narrative. She’s not even talking in the video. They’re all the same.
“Hey watch this video where Hillary lies, except she’s not actually saying anything, but a right wing conspiracy theorist will tell you what she did wrong “
Flagpole wrote:
1) It wouldn't matter if Hillary were a serial killer and ate her victims. Who she is has NOTHING to do with what we have going on in the White House. No one here has ever said she was a perfect or even a good candidate. As we have unprecedented chaos in the White House with a President who apparently doesn't understand complex issues nor has any inclination to learn or study, it is clear Hillary would have been better. But again, it doesn't matter. She is not the president. We have a failing President in the White House, and that's what those against him are against. Bringing up Hillary Clinton at this point is a deflection and perhaps a defense mechanism for those of you who voted for Trump. He is a serial liar and a criminal and his day of reckoning (legal and/or political reckoning) will come.
But Trump inspired more women to run for office!
And Hillary would have been just as bad anyway.
http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/406559-susan-sarandon-trump-unintentionally-energized-politicsMajor Blame wrote:
The major correction, possible crash is coming wrote:
Some may try and use tax or economic arguments but everyone knows the current economic gains are temporary and that the tax cuts will be bigly bad long term.
The game the fake Republicans in Congress are playing is this. They know their tax giveaway is a disaster. They know it has to be fixed by increasing taxes. They know they will lose control for the three branches of government. They know Democrats will increase taxes to erase their tax giveaway. Republicans will then claim: Democrats must be removed from office because they increase taxes, while Republicans decrease taxes.
Well, I doubt their strategy is that coherent. How do you think the Dems will gain control of the judicial branch? Kavanaugh will be confirmed—likely before the end of the month. They cannot stop that and I doubt the Dems accusations forwarded to the FBI will delay a confirmation vote long enough to get past the Nov. elections.
Additionally, it is highly unlikely the Dems will take back the Senate. In fact, my guess is they will lose 1-3 seats. So, even if the Kavanaugh vote is delayed he will still be confirmed at some point.
I do think the Dems take the House in November—there we agree. I also think it is likely if that happens they will try and impeach Trump. But, without the Senate I think it is unlikely that the GOP controlled Senate votes to convict. So Trump will likely stay until at least 2020.
I do, howver, believe the fiscal irresponsibility of the GOP controlled congress will have a MAJOR negative impact on the US for years to come. Whether hardcore Trumpers or even typical GOP voters are smart enough or insightful enough to realize the flaws of their parties economic and tax policies remains to be seen. But the crash is coming and it will be largely due to ridiculous GOP tax legislation.
I would not take that bet wrote:
Major Blame wrote:
The game the fake Republicans in Congress are playing is this. They know their tax giveaway is a disaster. They know it has to be fixed by increasing taxes. They know they will lose control for the three branches of government. They know Democrats will increase taxes to erase their tax giveaway. Republicans will then claim: Democrats must be removed from office because they increase taxes, while Republicans decrease taxes.
How do you think the Dems will gain control of the judicial branch?
WTF are you jabbering about? The judicial branch has no say in budgets, and tax increases or decreases.
Major Blame wrote:
I would not take that bet wrote:
How do you think the Dems will gain control of the judicial branch?
WTF are you jabbering about? The judicial branch has no say in budgets, and tax increases or decreases.
Bruh, have you taken a US Government or history class? What are the three branches of government in the US? Google it if you don’t know. They ARE NOT the Executive branch, the House, and the Senate. Look at the bolder portion of your post.....
The correct answer is The Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch (includes the House and Senate), and the Judical branch).
Your welcome. Moran.
p.n. wrote:
come on, man! wrote:
I'm dying to read flagpole's explanation of how his usage of "infer" was somehow correct in this situation. It must have been, since he is never wrong, and since he has worked as a professional writer, among other things...?
For those who are in the dark: The word Flagpole should have used in this situation was "imply" and not "infer."
It's a common error. The old "Perry Mason" TV series used to make the same mistake all the time.
"You folks should probably give it up on this one. Flagpole's use was perfectly legitimate.
infer (v): to suggest or hint ("You are bringing up things I did not say or infer.")
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/infer"
Now, since you came back to this after the proof was previously posted that Flagpole was in fact correct I am going to have to award you Four Pinocchios. Congratulations!
inferred wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
inferred,
Learn you something:
Try this link.
http://grammarist.com/usage/imply-infer/
Dude, I used the word appropriately to say what it was I meant to say. Sorry, you are wrong about that.
.. wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I know the meaning of the word. I used it to mean exactly that.
Stay in your Ohio trailer park, please don't think of moving West, you couldn't handle it.
Yep. I live in a trailer park. Gives you great standing on the rest of what you said. Ha! Couldn't handle moving west? What does that even mean. I've already lived in California for 4 years before. Kind of an easier lifestyle out there.
BUT, enough about my awesome life and self...
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
I would not take that bet wrote:
Major Blame wrote:
WTF are you jabbering about? The judicial branch has no say in budgets, and tax increases or decreases.
Bruh, have you taken a US Government or history class? What are the three branches of government in the US? Google it if you don’t know. They ARE NOT the Executive branch, the House, and the Senate. Look at the bolder portion of your post.....
The correct answer is The Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch (includes the House and Senate), and the Judical branch).
Your welcome. Moran.
Reading comprehension is not one of your skills.
WFT is a "Judical" branch?
Hey flagpole, how does it feel to always lose and be wrong?
What you all have to understand is flagpole just states things reported on cnn/msnbc. I wouldn’t be shocked if he works for them. He’s not smarter then anyone else on here.
L L wrote:
Here's a link to the Fox segment about Cruz being concerned about O'Rourke.
I am telling people, this is a serious race and a Democrat can win a statewide seat in Texas.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/15/ted-cruz-says-his-texas-senate-race-is-competitive-because-far-left-has-lost-their-minds.html
I can get on board with this one. Cruz may totally fvck himself during their debates. It would be an awesome way for him to finally go away for good.
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
Hey flagpole, how does it feel to always lose and be wrong?
What you all have to understand is flagpole just states things reported on cnn/msnbc. I wouldn’t be shocked if he works for them. He’s not smarter then anyone else on here.
1) Since I don't always lose and since I'm not always wrong, I can't answer your question.
2) CNN and MSNBC have NEVER stated that Mueller is coming and the clown is done. Remember that I have stated those things for over a year now. I report FACTS from any news source that has a reliable fact, and then I state my own opinions based on those facts. Sometimes my opinions might overlap with someone else's, because my opinions are not way out of bounds, but I never parrot anyone else's opinions, because as I've said before, I can say it as well or better. Here's another thing I have said several times that NONE of the news media has said that I've heard...they always focus on Don Jr.'s comment "I love it", but they never focus on the next part of that sentence, "especially later in the summer". The second part is just as important if not more so than the "I love it" part, because he is telling them WHEN he would like that done. That is what signifies coordination.
3) Nope, I do not work for CNN ("the most trusted name in news"). I used to be a news reporter and sports reporter for a big metropolitan daily newspaper and then also for some smaller papers, and I have a degree in journalism, but I haven't worked as a journalist now in over 20 years.
4) I'm not smarter than "anyone" else "on here"? Umm...statistically that would be a huge anomaly. If you need to tell yourself that to feel better, then fine with me though.
Enough about me and my awesome life and self.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
37320
“What kind of an amoral ideologue still supports a politician who has had FIVE campaign officials plead guilty to federal charges?”
Trump's idiotic xenophobes fail, again:
https://www.princetonpolicy.com/ppa-blog/2018/9/13/here-they-come-border-crossings-surge
What happened Conservative Justice Warriors? I thought Trump was going to fix the "immigration problem"?
Idiots.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Trump's idiotic xenophobes fail, again:
https://www.princetonpolicy.com/ppa-blog/2018/9/13/here-they-come-border-crossings-surgeWhat happened Conservative Justice Warriors? I thought Trump was going to fix the "immigration problem"?
Idiots.
Trump did fix "it." He forced immigration to accept Melania's elderly, non-working, non-genius, parents to become US citizens.