Do you realize that Trump is setting precedent for any and all future presidents to squash every single thing that Trump is doing by executive order? All of it. All the spending. Everything.
On correspondence NOTon legally binding documents. The difference is critical which makes the criticism valid.
Automized wrote:
The Constitution does not require a president's signature to be valid.
The Constitution does enumerate that a Presidential signature is required in several instances. The controversy exists over its use for pardons because those are a personal decision but it is clear that Biden did NOT personally approve hundreds of pardons.
This man was gifted a second presidency because Democrats couldn’t figure out they had to get a sick and senile man out before 2024. He had easy debates , an overwhelming victory with majority population and (obviously) electoral support. He came into 2025 with the strongest economy ever. Trump has: not controlled illegal immigration, brought down stocks with tariffs, made competitors with tariffs, made vehicles more expensive, disgracefully covered up a pedophilia ring (why?), and bowed down to Putin’s demands, showed weakness to Putin. His first presidency was a whole lot worse f talking and doing nothing. His second presidency is a whole lot of talking with added bonus of sinking the whole country.
It seems as though we've replaced one sick and senile/demented man with another one.
Overall, I liked the previous guy's policies better.
This man was gifted a second presidency because Democrats couldn’t figure out they had to get a sick and senile man out before 2024. He had easy debates , an overwhelming victory with majority population and (obviously) electoral support. He came into 2025 with the strongest economy ever. Trump has: not controlled illegal immigration, brought down stocks with tariffs, made competitors with tariffs, made vehicles more expensive, disgracefully covered up a pedophilia ring (why?), and bowed down to Putin’s demands, showed weakness to Putin. His first presidency was a whole lot worse f talking and doing nothing. His second presidency is a whole lot of talking with added bonus of sinking the whole country.
Literally nothing you claimed was true. #tdsisreal
This man was gifted a second presidency because Democrats couldn’t figure out they had to get a sick and senile man out before 2024. He had easy debates , an overwhelming victory with majority population and (obviously) electoral support. He came into 2025 with the strongest economy ever. Trump has: not controlled illegal immigration, brought down stocks with tariffs, made competitors with tariffs, made vehicles more expensive, disgracefully covered up a pedophilia ring (why?), and bowed down to Putin’s demands, showed weakness to Putin. His first presidency was a whole lot worse f talking and doing nothing. His second presidency is a whole lot of talking with added bonus of sinking the whole country.
You completely ignored how the Trump administration is infiltrated by zionists and is beholden to Israel. I would argue it's a step in the right direction he actually met with Putin. Are you one of these idiots that doesn't recognize Russia is winning the war and is negotiating from a position of strength?
"Abused its discretion" is a well settled legal term that refers to the standard of review an appellate court uses when decided whether to overturn a lower court. It just indicates the level of deference to a lower court. Questions of law are reviewed "de novo", meaning that the appellate court has no deference to the lower court. Questions of fact are reviewed under a "clearly erroneous" standard. Jury verdicts are given a substantial evidence review. Before recent Supreme Court case on Chevron, administrative agencies were reviewed on arbitrary and capricious. The highest level of review is of lower court's discretionary decisions. That is reviewed under abuse of discretion as appellate courts generally stay out of the way of how a lower court manages its cases.
It is in no way "calling out" a lower court. If you search for "abused its discretion" on Lexis or Westlaw you will get thousand and thousands of results.
Do you realize that Trump is setting precedent for any and all future presidents to squash every single thing that Trump is doing by executive order? All of it. All the spending. Everything.
If any future Democrat (though I thought we weren’t going to have elections in the future?) President wants to also cut out government spending via rescissions, I welcome it. We spend far too much…
"Abused its discretion" is a well settled legal term that refers to the standard of review an appellate court uses when decided whether to overturn a lower court. It just indicates the level of deference to a lower court. Questions of law are reviewed "de novo", meaning that the appellate court has no deference to the lower court. Questions of fact are reviewed under a "clearly erroneous" standard. Jury verdicts are given a substantial evidence review. Before recent Supreme Court case on Chevron, administrative agencies were reviewed on arbitrary and capricious. The highest level of review is of lower court's discretionary decisions. That is reviewed under abuse of discretion as appellate courts generally stay out of the way of how a lower court manages its cases.
It is in no way "calling out" a lower court. If you search for "abused its discretion" on Lexis or Westlaw you will get thousand and thousands of results.
Yeah but… “Calling out” the lower court gets lots more clicks and reposts from maga!
I didn't really like Biden's policies but Trump is even more extreme with a bent towards traditional leftwing policies in many areas. Free trade, tariffs, centrally planned economy, nationalization of private corporations, consolidating executive power, lawfare. None of these I expected to see from a president who tells people he is a conservative.
Do you realize that Trump is setting precedent for any and all future presidents to squash every single thing that Trump is doing by executive order? All of it. All the spending. Everything.
If any future Democrat (though I thought we weren’t going to have elections in the future?) President wants to also cut out government spending via rescissions, I welcome it. We spend far too much…
I didn't really like Biden's policies but Trump is even more extreme with a bent towards traditional leftwing policies in many areas. Free trade, tariffs, centrally planned economy, nationalization of private corporations, consolidating executive power, lawfare. None of these I expected to see from a president who tells people he is a conservative.
Trump’s “lawfare” is getting vengeance / revenge after he was the victim of a TON of Democrat lawfare. I don’t blame him at all
You completely ignored how the Trump administration is infiltrated by zionists and is beholden to Israel. I would argue it's a step in the right direction he actually met with Putin. Are you one of these idiots that doesn't recognize Russia is winning the war and is negotiating from a position of strength?
Newname, you are just too cute!
It's ok, you can use your registered name here. This is your safe place.
This man was gifted a second presidency because Democrats couldn’t figure out they had to get a sick and senile man out before 2024. He had easy debates , an overwhelming victory with majority population and (obviously) electoral support. He came into 2025 with the strongest economy ever. Trump has: not controlled illegal immigration, brought down stocks with tariffs, made competitors with tariffs, made vehicles more expensive, disgracefully covered up a pedophilia ring (why?), and bowed down to Putin’s demands, showed weakness to Putin. His first presidency was a whole lot worse f talking and doing nothing. His second presidency is a whole lot of talking with added bonus of sinking the whole country.
Literally nothing you claimed was true. #tdsisreal