Quit being so angry. Does ambulance chasing got you that mad? No one wants you as a lawyer. Considered a career as court reporter?
Nope- I have no tolerance for your type of bullsh*t. You continually spout false and misleading information. Then you attempt to hide behind an "Aw Shucks" persona. You are a jerk through and through. Yet, you demand some sort of decorum from others. No thanks. You deserve all that comes to you.
People like you are worse than that Adolt/Winston moron. He's clearly an idiot that can't control his impulse to respond. You on the other hand attempt to be disguise your intentions, albeit poorly. I've met plenty of characters like you, you're all the same. Not worth a modicum of respect.
Sally Vix is a troll. The game he's playing is to stubbornly hammer a particular talking point ignoring any contrary information to provoke an angry response, then call out the responder for being angry. He's done this for years.
You can't have a meaningful conversation with someone who isn't interested in having a meaningful conversation. You can't win an argument because their motivation is to extend the argument indefinitely until the mark simply gives up or loses their cool, not to make a sensible point.
The best thing to do, and this is very difficult sometimes, is to recognize these people for being the pathetic creatures that they are and denying them the gratification that comes with any response at all.
MAG@s were very upset when the Moskva got sunk. Some of them were reduced to blubbery tears. You can find videos online of them crying for Russian sailors. They made a total spectacle of themselves. Embarrassed everything they stand for and humiliated the MAG@ movement.
You idiots lie about absolutely everything.
You couldn't find the Black Sea on a globe if your life depended on it.
“All-or-nothing thinking” is a symptom of numerous potential problems, some of which are outlined in the recent update of cognitive scientists’ study of Trump’s cognitive decline (the primary symptom of which is difficulty maintaining a train of thought, alarming even when compared to his long-standing rambling style extending back decades). You can see the discussion on STATnews.
You couldn't find the Black Sea on a globe if your life depended on it.
“All-or-nothing thinking” is a symptom of numerous potential problems, some of which are outlined in the recent update of cognitive scientists’ study of Trump’s cognitive decline (the primary symptom of which is difficulty maintaining a train of thought, alarming even when compared to his long-standing rambling style extending back decades). You can see the discussion on STATnews.
Provide a single shred of evidence that a single Trump supporter was "very upset" let alone ALL "MAG@s were very upset when the Moskva got sunk".
You're literally defending the "all-or-nothing thinking" you're railing against.
If you had a shred of self awareness you'd be embarrassed.
“All-or-nothing thinking” is a symptom of numerous potential problems, some of which are outlined in the recent update of cognitive scientists’ study of Trump’s cognitive decline (the primary symptom of which is difficulty maintaining a train of thought, alarming even when compared to his long-standing rambling style extending back decades). You can see the discussion on STATnews.
Provide a single shred of evidence that a single Trump supporter was "very upset" let alone ALL "MAG@s were very upset when the Moskva got sunk".
You're literally defending the "all-or-nothing thinking" you're railing against.
If you had a shred of self awareness you'd be embarrassed.
I’m sorry: How am I defending anything another poster said? Where exactly did I explicitly state or strongly imply that Jordon or whoever was right?
So then why does everyone who serves during wartime get a National Defense medal? Everyone no matter where they're stationed. Huh? How about that?
These are facts. Facts prevail over feelings and assumptions.
You're operating entirely on feelings and assumptions which is why you have no idea what the National Defense medal means.
People who actually served know the difference. If you have a National Defense medal and no combat patch or campaign medals or combat service stripes no one who actually served would think you were in theater or consider you a combat veteran.
So, just like I said, everyone gets a National Defense Medal.
I know that because I have one, along with my Southwest Asia Service Medal, Kuwait Liberation medal, and a bunch of other medals and ribbons I earned in the Gulf War.
People just graduating Boot Camp got the National Defense Service Medal. Those of us deployed over there obviously got the campaign medal too. I know that you know that is how it works.
I admit that I don't have any Combat Vs on my medals. Our pilots flew combat missions from my carrier in the middle of the Gulf, but the ship itself didn't see direct combat.
Tim Walz admits he doesn't have any Combat Vs either. I don't see that he ever claimed to.
Has everyone fully absorbed how certifiably insane Trump is with this Truth post yesterday? Don’t just read it quickly. Sit with it a bit. Think about what is going through this sociopath’s mind to think this was appropriate to post. Think about how stupid he must feel his base is.
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump What are the chances that Crooked Joe Biden, the WORST President in the history of the U.S., whose Presidency was Unconstitutionally STOLEN from him by Kamabla, Barrack HUSSEIN Obama, Crazy Nancy Pelosi, Shifty Adam Schiff, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, and others on the Lunatic Left, CRASHES the Democrat National Convention and tries to take back the Nomination, beginning with challenging me to another DEBATE. He feels that he made a historically tragic mistake by handing over the U.S. Presidency, a COUP, to the people in the World he most hates, and he wants it back, NOW!!!
Yep, that man is absolutely insane. Pure crazy rantings.
Gary it's gonna be a very hard cope for you and other trump lovers. Trump doesn't command the headlines anymore and lost his ability to define Ds to the public. Tim has already been crystalized as the common dude from rural midwest that everyone loves - teacher, coach, veteran. Not to mention he came up with "weird" and "mind your damn business". Most Americans are falling in love it him while Mr. Maybelline continues to be a massive liability for the convicted felon (go figure!). Oh and they bagged another $40 million since the announcement. You are gonna cry on election day.
Trump doesn't need the headlines.
The Laughing Hyena is making unforced errors all over the place. She's proving herself to be the incompetent fool every single day.
Tampon Tim is making it so easy for Trump & Vance to exploit.
Damn. If you're right, then Trump is in big trouble. With all of those unforced errors and incompetent foolishness, she's passed Trump and is now pulling away.
MAG@s were very upset when the Moskva got sunk. Some of them were reduced to blubbery tears. You can find videos online of them crying for Russian sailors. They made a total spectacle of themselves. Embarrassed everything they stand for and humiliated the MAG@ movement.
You idiots lie about absolutely everything.
You couldn't find the Black Sea on a globe if your life depended on it.
You have a henpecked look about you. That's why people at your job pick on you.
Anyway, the following is true:
1. Donald Trump persuaded his friends at the National Enquirer (Pecker) to publish fake stories about his opponents during Trump's 2016 campaign.
2. One such fake story, that Trump actually developed himself, was that Rafael "Ted" Cruz's father (Rafael Sr.) was in cahoots with L. H. Oswald in assassinating J. F. Kennedy.
3. The National Enquirer (Peckerman) published that fake story about Rafael Sr. with Trump's approval.
4. Trump referenced the fake Rafael Cruz story several times during his 2016 primary campaign. Trump did the whole "I heard" bit. Trump won over many voters with the slander of Cruz's father.
5. "Ted" Cruz accused Trump of creating the fake story with the National Enquirer (Peck).
6. Trump denied any role in the National Enquirer (Pecker) fake story. Trump said: “I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not, but I had absolutely nothing to do with it, did not know about it."
7. Trump was balls-out lying to his MAG@ faithful. Trump was the one who came up with the fake Cruz story and told National Pecker to publish it. Then he denied any involvement. Trump loves fabricating sh!t and lying about it. He's awesome.
8. Trump later called "Ted" Cruz's wife ugly. Trump was being honest at that point, because Cruz's wife is very ugly.
Has everyone fully absorbed how certifiably insane Trump is with this Truth post yesterday? Don’t just read it quickly. Sit with it a bit. Think about what is going through this sociopath’s mind to think this was appropriate to post. Think about how stupid he must feel his base is.
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump What are the chances that Crooked Joe Biden, the WORST President in the history of the U.S., whose Presidency was Unconstitutionally STOLEN from him by Kamabla, Barrack HUSSEIN Obama, Crazy Nancy Pelosi, Shifty Adam Schiff, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, and others on the Lunatic Left, CRASHES the Democrat National Convention and tries to take back the Nomination, beginning with challenging me to another DEBATE. He feels that he made a historically tragic mistake by handing over the U.S. Presidency, a COUP, to the people in the World he most hates, and he wants it back, NOW!!!
Yep, that man is absolutely insane. Pure crazy rantings.
this is really sad; I hate Trump, but I'm also sad for him. He's clearly mentally ill and untreated. The millions of yes men and women behind him enable his illness, but he is as deranged as Roseanne or one of these street defecators in San Francisco. It's truly bizarre and unfortunate.
You're operating entirely on feelings and assumptions which is why you have no idea what the National Defense medal means.
People who actually served know the difference. If you have a National Defense medal and no combat patch or campaign medals or combat service stripes no one who actually served would think you were in theater or consider you a combat veteran.
So, just like I said, everyone gets a National Defense Medal.
I know that because I have one, along with my Southwest Asia Service Medal, Kuwait Liberation medal, and a bunch of other medals and ribbons I earned in the Gulf War.
People just graduating Boot Camp got the National Defense Service Medal. Those of us deployed over there obviously got the campaign medal too. I know that you know that is how it works.
I admit that I don't have any Combat Vs on my medals. Our pilots flew combat missions from my carrier in the middle of the Gulf, but the ship itself didn't see direct combat.
Tim Walz admits he doesn't have any Combat Vs either. I don't see that he ever claimed to.
You're lying.
He said he used weapons of war in war.
If you know that's how it works you know damn well that a supply guy in Kansas wasn't in the Gulf War despite having a National Defense ribbon.
It would be accurate for you to say you were in the Gulf War. It would be dishonest to call yourself a combat veteran.
Much like it would be dishonest for the supply guy in Kansas to claim he was in the Gulf War because he served while it was going on and got a defense medal.
I’m sorry: How am I defending anything another poster said? Where exactly did I explicitly state or strongly imply that Jordon or whoever was right?
Ah yes you rushed to his defense because you don't agree with him.
lol...
“Rushed to his defense?” I can’t stand the fact that Walz referenced the couch joke, but I agree with JD Vance waaaaaayyyyyyyy less than I disagree with him (I mean, on what I suppose Vance means — It’s kind of hard when he has a history of taking both sides of an issue). And I agree with Walz a fair bit more than I disagree with him. And that would be the case fo me maybe “defending” someone by directly denying a charge leveled at them. In my post above, I commented on a style of thinking I’ve seen from you time and time again, which may be hyperbole, but I think you lean on that crutch a little too easily.
And if I suggested that you might fall prey to all-or-nothing thinking?
Well, at the moment, I haven’t seen you even contemplating the possibility that I could think you’ve both said something that I take issue with.
You really seem to struggle quite a bit with this stuff.
You couldn't find the Black Sea on a globe if your life depended on it.
You have a henpecked look about you. That's why people at your job pick on you.
Anyway, the following is true:
1. Donald Trump persuaded his friends at the National Enquirer (Pecker) to publish fake stories about his opponents during Trump's 2016 campaign.
2. One such fake story, that Trump actually developed himself, was that Rafael "Ted" Cruz's father (Rafael Sr.) was in cahoots with L. H. Oswald in assassinating J. F. Kennedy.
3. The National Enquirer (Peckerman) published that fake story about Rafael Sr. with Trump's approval.
4. Trump referenced the fake Rafael Cruz story several times during his 2016 primary campaign. Trump did the whole "I heard" bit. Trump won over many voters with the slander of Cruz's father.
5. "Ted" Cruz accused Trump of creating the fake story with the National Enquirer (Peck).
6. Trump denied any role in the National Enquirer (Pecker) fake story. Trump said: “I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not, but I had absolutely nothing to do with it, did not know about it."
7. Trump was balls-out lying to his MAG@ faithful. Trump was the one who came up with the fake Cruz story and told National Pecker to publish it. Then he denied any involvement. Trump loves fabricating sh!t and lying about it. He's awesome.
8. Trump later called "Ted" Cruz's wife ugly. Trump was being honest at that point, because Cruz's wife is very ugly.
1. If you followed the trial (you didn't) or knew anything about it (you don't) you would know that Pecker testified under oath that the National Enquirer did this for Trump long before he was a candidate.
2. Who cares? It's the National Enquirer ffs. The cover is usually about alien abductions and women giving birth to sea monsters... no one takes the National Enquirer seriously.
3. The NYT and WaPo and mainstream legitimate papers coordinated with Democrats to write fake stories about Trump. What's worse the New York Times lying for politics or the National f*cking Enquirer???
4. Trump didn't win over any voters with that story you liar.
5. Hillary Clinton created the fake Steele Dossier and the entire media ran with it like it was gospel despite everyone knowing it was complete and utter BS. Spare me your fake outrage.
6. Trump didn't make up the story. Pecker testified that Michael Cohen was the one he worked with not Trump directly.
7. Clinton and Biden did far far worse than pay a tabloid to continue to print stories no one takes seriously.
8. I'll take a guy who says inartful things over braindead leftists who actively hate the country every time thanks.
I’m sorry: How am I defending anything another poster said? Where exactly did I explicitly state or strongly imply that Jordon or whoever was right?
Ah yes you rushed to his defense because you don't agree with him.
lol...
It's been over two years and your people are still upset about the sinking of Moskva.
This is Moskva moments before it hit the bottom of the Black Sea. It got harpooned. Are you seriously going to deny this image doesn't provoke strong emotions for the MAG@s?
Ah yes you rushed to his defense because you don't agree with him.
lol...
“Rushed to his defense?” I can’t stand the fact that Walz referenced the couch joke, but I agree with JD Vance waaaaaayyyyyyyy less than I disagree with him (I mean, on what I suppose Vance means — It’s kind of hard when he has a history of taking both sides of an issue). And I agree with Walz a fair bit more than I disagree with him. And that would be the case fo me maybe “defending” someone by directly denying a charge leveled at them. In my post above, I commented on a style of thinking I’ve seen from you time and time again, which may be hyperbole, but I think you lean on that crutch a little too easily.
And if I suggested that you might fall prey to all-or-nothing thinking?
Well, at the moment, I haven’t seen you even contemplating the possibility that I could think you’ve both said something that I take issue with.
You really seem to struggle quite a bit with this stuff.
We live in a binary political system.
It's all or nothing.
You really seem to struggle with reality.
You didn't attack the Democrat for lying through his teeth you attacked me for my response.
Ah yes you rushed to his defense because you don't agree with him.
lol...
It's been over two years and your people are still upset about the sinking of Moskva.
This is Moskva moments before it hit the bottom of the Black Sea. It got harpooned. Are you seriously going to deny this image doesn't provoke strong emotions for the MAG@s?
It's hilarious how quickly you leftist idiots went from laughing at Romney for calling Russia our greatest geopolitical threat to all being anti-Russian zealots.
It is truly amazing how much influence the media has over stupid people.
Why do you enable this mentally ill, unfit man? Trump clearly needs help and people who genuinely care about his well being rather than a legion of fanatics like a wind at his deeply disturbed back.
Get the man some help and stop enabling his madness.
