Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

This is the last time I’m going to respond to you since you are clearly dumb.

1) a stalled cat 4 is more dangerous than a stalled cat 2 - Are you that stupid that you needed to type that?

2) You fail to understand that if it remained a cat 4 that it would have been faster moving and smaller. Faster moving and smaller storms due LESS damage. You said it was helpful that it was now a cat 2 (you said ghis twice). This is not even close to true.

3) I AM bringing up things you did not say or infer. I simply pointed out that you were wrong when you said that since it was downgraded that it was “helpful.” It clearly (to intelligent people, at least) that it is not for the numerous reasons I stated.

4) That’s great that you never said a fast moving storm of any strength was more dangerous than slow moving cat 2. I never said you did.

You really need to shut up about things you clearly are ignorant about.

You might enjoy this.. I know I will.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tentative-deal-reached-manafort-special-counsel-sources/story?id=57809113

Senate is secured, Dems won’t be taking it this time around, but would be nice to at least see them net win seats which is also less likely.

Not FP's style, dude.

Noticer of dominance wrote:

You might enjoy this.. I know I will.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tentative-deal-reached-manafort-special-counsel-sources/story?id=57809113

I have a hard time believing that Manafort will flip. I think he fears Putin more than he fears prison (and rightfully so).

So which of the senate races that I laid out do you think the Dems will lose?

Name 3

They have to lose 3 of them to not gain the senate.

Flagpole wrote:You are bringing up things I didn't not say or infer....

Probably not, brother wrote:

Wibster wrote:

Indeed. This is quite damning. It's also a bit of a puzzle. Wouldn't it be quite helpful in someone's career to write such a book?

No it wouldn’t help someone’s career to write such a book for a couple of reasons. First, it would be a total lie—as everyone knows Trump is an unhinged idiot. So the author would immediately lose any credibility they may have had. Second, there would be no market for such a book outside of Trump’s immediate family. The second point is due to the fact that approximately 82.756% of Trump’s base doesn’t read—many probably don’t know how to read. They just watch the news “shows” and listen to right wing radio to pick up the latest talking points.

Everyone would know it was a lie, but Trump wouldn't know that everyone knows this. Therefore he would appreciate the effort and loyalty and what reward this person.

The author would probably be someone who already had no credibility.

There have been a lot of pro-Trump books, but they are more about his policies or campaign. I'm not sure one has been written extolling his virtues as a thinker and leader. They sell quite well. I don't know if they are read or not.

agip wrote:

hey trumpers

not only is there no trumpy wall, and not only did Mexico not pay for that trumpy wall, but spanky is paying mexico to take back illegals.

That's your man. Overpromise, underdeliver, then lie about it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/12/us/politics/us-mexico-deportation-funds.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

Happier than sh*t that it pisses you off. If only Hillary had lied less, you might have had a better chance 22 months ago! Next time, get a better candidate Bozo! LOL!

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

Gallant Pig Man==Lying Moron wrote:

Yeah, like Jennifer Granholm did to my state for HOW MANY YEARS?

You're a 1-sided lying liberal piece of dog cr@p! Corruption of Democracy? Did that make you feel smart?

You attempt to sound intelligent, but you always leave out the important parts. Sooooooo glad Hillary Clinton was defeated.

Okay, precious, why don't you provide an example of Michigan Democrats employing a similar strategy to undermine a policy they disagreed with (as if this would somehow justify the Michigan GOP's actions) or other important information that I have left out of this story. It shouldn't be that hard considering, as you say, it was going on under Granholm FOR YEARS. Or are you a liar?

Do your own research Princess, she ran the State into the ground you lying moron.

Here's a teaser since you're such a fat old lazy a$$ liberal who runs his mouth with zero clout!

Gallant Pig Man==Lying Moron wrote:

Do your own research Princess

Hardloper. UR such a princess. Late nights in park restrooms must be good times 4U.

L L wrote:

I posted about the Democrats chance to gain the senate with no response.

Here is Beto O'Rourke, who I think will beat Ted Cruz to gain a seat for the Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5IES0UP9sc

I just don’t see O’Rourke winning. I think it’s all just the media trying to make a story.

The undecideds will come home to roost in the status quo.

Cruz will win by 5+%...Maybe 10%.

Alan

PrincessLoper wrote:

Gallant Pig Man==Lying Moron wrote:

Do your own research Princess

Hardloper. UR such a princess. Late nights in park restrooms must be good times 4U.

Gravy wrote:

PrincessLoper wrote:

Hardloper. UR such a princess. Late nights in park restrooms must be good times 4U.

https://media.giphy.com/media/1Yd7pzF61dSJ3iE5Xw/giphy.gif

Ladyboy . . . yuck

Michael Avanatti vs Tucker Carlson Wow, fireworks baby, right now!!!!!!!!!!

Runningart2004 wrote:

I just don’t see O’Rourke winning. I think it’s all just the media trying to make a story.

The undecideds will come home to roost in the status quo.

Cruz will win by 5+%...Maybe 10%.

Alan

I was in that range until a couple of weeks ago. Now I think Cruz will win but inside 5%. Trump carried Texas by 9%. This is a much more popular Democratic candidate and the cycle is pro blue unlike 2016. Beto will get heavy Hispanic turnout along the border. There is already evidence of that.

Texas had only 57% whites in the 2016 electorate. That's what makes a flip possible, although this is probably too early. Upper midwestern states like Ohio (80%) and Iowa (90%) have a demographic makeup that is considerably more favorable to the GOP.

For Beto to win he probably needs to keep that white turnout below 60% of the total, and keep women at 53% of the electorate, similar to a presidential year. However, the trend in midterms is that white percentage goes up and female percentage goes down. The latter is a key variable for Democrats nationwide this year. They need the gender gap to fully play out with single women showing up. Normally single women don't bother in midterms, and the female percentage of the vote shrinks from 53% in presidential years to 51% in midterms. That's another thing the networks and cable programs never bother to mention, even though it is a pivotal factor.

Beto is a remarkable candidate. He is a rock star candidate, probably the best newcomer for either party this cycle. I'm sick he is from Texas. He looks somewhat like Bobby Kennedy and has some of the same speaking qualities.

Absolute star qualities but he may never reach rightful level in that state.

L L wrote:

So which of the senate races that I laid out do you think the Dems will lose?

Name 3

They have to lose 3 of them to not gain the senate.

I think they will lose N Dakota, Mississippi, Nebraska and probably Utah.

Runningart2004 wrote:

L L wrote:

I posted about the Democrats chance to gain the senate with no response.

Here is Beto O'Rourke, who I think will beat Ted Cruz to gain a seat for the Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5IES0UP9sc

I just don’t see O’Rourke winning. I think it’s all just the media trying to make a story.

The undecideds will come home to roost in the status quo.

Cruz will win by 5+%...Maybe 10%.

Alan

If the undecideds/ independents come out, O’Rourke wins.

Cruz needs the base to come out hard because there will be more moderates and liberals voting in Texas than usual.

Cruz has the built in advantage of regular Republican voting state wide.

But things change.

BREAKING!!

Ted Cruz intern arrested for bringing shotgun shells to work

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/13/politics/ted-cruz-intern-arrested/index.html