SCOTUS will overturn the ruling. Keep in mind, this is the court that ruled Trump can crime with immunity.
Overstepping congress to declare a fake national emergency to implement tariffs will be an easy lift for this SCOTUS Tgey will be cool with it.
The Obama appointed judge said what Trump did was lawful...it'll probably be 6-3 or 7-2 at SCOTUS with Ketanji and Sotomayor dissenting. Kagan a coin flip, and Roberts might RINO out.
Not that it matters. But Trump has given away the game many times. We are in no national emergency. He has stated many reasons for the tariff s that have nothing to do with a national emergency. Things like, this leader said bad things about me. Or, we want Canada. Or this country bought some of my Meme coin.
SCOTUS won’t care because Trump can break laws as he sees fit.
"Donald Trump’s approval rating has dropped to new lows for his second term. The percentage of voters who say they support the job Trump has done since returning to the White House has dropped again in a Quinnipiac University poll. Released earlier this week, the survey also found that a higher percentage of Americans than ever before say that Israel is committing a genocide, including more than seven in ten Democrats. 37 percent of American registered voters approve of the president’s job performance to date. A much larger share, 55 percent, disapprove. But the big news for the president is a three-point drop in his approval rating in just a month. Fueled by a drop among Republican voters, the poll is a sign that Trump’s own MAGA base, reinvigorated in 2024, is now chipping away under continued pressure from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and the administration’s ongoing frustrations as it pertains to Trump’s promise to stop the bloodshed in Gaza."
Who would have guessed that just because Trump says we are in a “national emergency” to bypass and usurp Congressional authority, that it might not be legal.
“FOX: Breaking tonight, just moments ago actually, a federal appeals court ruled most of President Trump's tariffs are illegal. The court is saying the president exceeded his authority…”
Too bad the great GOP patriots in Congress don’t love the constitution nearly as much as the average federal judge.
Who did? WTF are you talking about? State your case, fishface.
I have to ride the elevator down, slam some drinks, and pick up the goddam tab for this Friday happy hour. Jesus goddam Christ, I’m an extremely busy man and I don’t have time for this.
The heartbreaking mass shooting at the Annunciation Catholic Church on Wednesday has brought the issue of transgenderism once again to the forefront of American conversations.
Wisconsin Supreme Court: the Democrat candidate campaigned on changing the maps. As soon as she's elected, Marc Elias' lawfare group sues them to try to change the maps.
"Lawfare." Right. That's what it is when the Dems actually try to correct an imbalance; but that's not what it is when the Texas GOP tries to exacerbate an imbalance. Riiiight.
President Trump defeated Harris by less than a percentage point in Wisconsin, yet its GOP-drawn map of Congressional districts gives the GOP six seats and the Dems two.
This post was edited 34 seconds after it was posted.
SCOTUS will overturn the ruling. Keep in mind, this is the court that ruled Trump can crime with immunity.
Overstepping congress to declare a fake national emergency to implement tariffs will be an easy lift for this SCOTUS Tgey will be cool with it.
The Obama appointed judge said what Trump did was lawful...it'll probably be 6-3 or 7-2 at SCOTUS with Ketanji and Sotomayor dissenting. Kagan a coin flip, and Roberts might RINO out.
Democrat appointed judge rules with Trump, maga says "see, even a democrat judge gets it!".
Democrat appointed judge rules against Trump, maga says "activist, radical democrat judges must be irradicated!".
Either way, the Constitution and law need not be considered by maga.
It is bizarre and disturbing that so many people have redefined America as "whatever Trump said / did is the right thing"
The Obama appointed judge said what Trump did was lawful...it'll probably be 6-3 or 7-2 at SCOTUS with Ketanji and Sotomayor dissenting. Kagan a coin flip, and Roberts might RINO out.
Democrat appointed judge rules with Trump, maga says "see, even a democrat judge gets it!".
Democrat appointed judge rules against Trump, maga says "activist, radical democrat judges must be irradicated!".
Either way, the Constitution and law need not be considered by maga.
It is bizarre and disturbing that so many people have redefined America as "whatever Trump said / did is the right thing"
"Lawfare." Right. That's what it is when the Dems actually try to correct an imbalance; but that's not what it is when the Texas GOP tries to exacerbate an imbalance. Riiiight.
President Trump defeated Harris by less than a percentage point in Wisconsin, yet its GOP-drawn map of Congressional districts gives the GOP six seats and the Dems two.
So California should have over 20 Republicans seats then?
Wisconsin’s rurality outside of 2 population centers makes a 6-2 map fair.
Trumpers during the height of a global pandemic that killed over 1.2 million Americans
“How dare they tell me to mask up and get vaccinated”
Trumpers as a crackpot, ex heroine addict dismantles one of the world’s premier disease fighting agencies and replaces lifelong doctors and scientists with antivax nutters:
“He’s just trying to make people healthy”
COVID broke a lot of people's minds.
Before COVID the vaccine conspiracists were people who lived off the grid and took pride in their self-sufficiency, with guns and canned food in preparation for a potential catastrophe.
However, when a major crisis did occur, the same people struggled with... wearing masks in public.
They have no problem wearings masks when tasked with rounding up Latinos!
🚨 BREAKING: DEI Judge Jia Cobb unilaterally blocks President Trump's immigration policy, deciding that he is no longer allowed to expeditiously deport criminal illegal aliens because Trump risks deporting foreigners not eligible to be sent home.
Donald J. Trump ReTruthed Mark Levin @marklevinshow THE APPELLATE COURT MAJORITY TARIFF DECISION WAS WRONG The appellate court majority that ruled against most of the president's tariffs has it wrong. Whether you like tariffs or not, the act at issue does, in fact, grant the president broad powers to declare an emergency. Even more, the Constitution, under Article II, grants the president broad powers to make foreign policy. The president's lawyers are obviously aware of this, which is why the executive orders at issue rely, in part, on serious foreign policy considerations, including, as an example, Mexico, Canada, and China, which the president has determined are not doing enough to prevent the flow of deadly drugs into our country. The combination of broad authority and Article II powers trump the issues raised by the court's majority. Moreover, judges should not be the final decision-makers about such matters as they're exercising authority that was never delegated to them, and they should not substitute their own policy preferences for the president's. The check here is Congress -- that is, if it wishes to amend the law or pass a new law curbing the president's power here. That said, Congress does not have boundless power, and it could run into separation of powers issues, given Article II and the president's foreign policy authority. The Supreme Court will, once again, rule on this. In the past, Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh have noted the broad authority of the president in circumstances similar to this. I expect Justice Alito would concur.
THINK ABOUT THIS Within the past five years alone, the Pedo-in-Chief Krasnov @realDonaldTrump has filed defamation suits against: - CNN - E. Jean Carroll - ABC News & George Stephanopoulos - Pulitzer Prize Board - the Wall Street Journal / Rupert Murdoch - various other news outlets But, he has NOT filed ANY defamation lawsuits against: - Elon Musk for posting he was in the Epstein files - Katie Johnson for three separate lawsuits detailing how he raped her when she was 13 years old - Sarah Ransome, one of Jeffrey Epstein's recruiters, for detailing how Trump had sex with a 12 year old girl - Tiffany Doe (pseudonym) for describing how Trump and Epstein raped a 13 year old girl Why do you think that is!??! I'll tell you why — bcos the Pedo-in-Chief Krasnov @realDonaldTrump is afraid of the discovery process. In discovery, Trump knows he will be placed under a microscope. And every piece of document related to this issue would surface — every monetary payout, every check, every filed lawsuit, every association, every step will be re-traced and examined. In short, he has not filed defamation suits against any of those people bcos he knows he'd be fucqed - bcos he knows he'd be exposed for the pedophile he truly is.
