Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Ha! I actually have NOT listened to CNN today and did not get this question or any thoughts about it from anyone. It's a reasonable question at this point.

Fat hurts wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

To be fair, Obama was for the spending, and as bad as that recession was, it was necessary.

George W. Bush was also partially responsible for the recovery spending. In the final days of his administration, W went ahead and cleared the way for the bailout. I don't remember the exact actions taken, but W recognized that the bailout was necessary and he didn't want Obama to be hamstrung with political considerations. So he acted just a few weeks before Obama was sworn in. I remember Obama explicitly thanking W for this unselfish act.

Yep. McCain was in on it all too, and it was a very bi-partisan thing. Was the right thing to do at the time.

Fat hurts wrote:

Liberal Mind wrote:

Remember, voter fraud doesn't exist (unless you investigate it).

"The defendants – from numerous countries, including Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Nigeria and Germany – were accused of filing a false claim of citizenship in order to vote or illegal voting."

Didn't some idiot on this thread say earlier that illegal aliens don't register and vote because they are afraid to risk being caught.

Wrong again, Flagpole.

Like all the previous investigations, this one will turn up something close to zilch. They may find a few voters who mistakenly thought they were eligible to vote. It may turn up one or two who were stupid enough to risk a felony conviction.

Total convictions of illegal immigrant voting will number less than ten. More likely, less than five.

But that's all. Nothing to see here.

They've already found more than that, dope.

Flagpole wrote:

CNN listener wrote:

Glad you listen to CNN. That exactly what they were saying this am.

Don’t try to pass it off as an original thought when you got the opinion from someone else.

Ha! I actually have NOT listened to CNN today and did not get this question or any thoughts about it from anyone. It's a reasonable question at this point.

You know that no one actually believes you, right?

If the poster was right that it was on CNN, you know that's where you got it. Man up for once. It's okay to say you got your opinion from the networks or papers. It's not alright to pass it off as your own.

Another Flagpole Lie wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Ha! I actually have NOT listened to CNN today and did not get this question or any thoughts about it from anyone. It's a reasonable question at this point.

You know that no one actually believes you, right?

If the poster was right that it was on CNN, you know that's where you got it. Man up for once. It's okay to say you got your opinion from the networks or papers. It's not alright to pass it off as your own.

I could not care less if anyone believes me. I would say I got it from CNN if it were true. I actually don't have cable television, so any CNN stuff I watch is usually later on in the evening when CNN and others put up clips on YouTube.

It's not an amazing question to ask, so it shouldn't be so surprising to you that an individual would have it...is this writer a coward or not? Pretty basic stuff for someone interested in the topic. My thoughts on it are not overly insightful either, so hardly something that even a person with NORMAL intelligence might have (and I'm WELL above normal).

My thought on stuff like this when someone accuses another of lifting an opinion from someone else is that the accuser isn't capable of creating their own opinions which is why they think what they think. So, whether right or wrong, I now think that you are not capable of forming your own opinion and that you have to have it force fed to you. Congrats.

> than wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Like all the previous investigations, this one will turn up something close to zilch. They may find a few voters who mistakenly thought they were eligible to vote. It may turn up one or two who were stupid enough to risk a felony conviction.

Total convictions of illegal immigrant voting will number less than ten. More likely, less than five.

But that's all. Nothing to see here.

They've already found more than that, dope.

Liar. They have not. Name the illegal immigrants who were convicted of in-person voter fraud. I bet you can't find a single one.

> than wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Total convictions of illegal immigrant voting will number less than ten. More likely, less than five.

They've already found more than that, dope.

0/10

Convicts are not "found."

Get back to us after you learn what convictions are, such as:

Fat hurts wrote:

CNN listener wrote:

Glad you listen to CNN. That exactly what they were saying this am.

Don’t try to pass it off as an original thought when you got the opinion from someone else.

He didn't try to pass it off as original. Flagpole explicitly said "I wasn't the only one on the planet, but yesterday I wrote..."

You are correct. Just for clarity sake, while I DID post that yesterday, I did so before I heard anyone else say it. I think last night someone on MSNBC said something similar. Also for clarity, that is not some big out-of-the-box thinking. There are really one a few reasonable answers as to why someone would write that op-ed piece, and the two I mentioned are right up there at the top. Pretty easy to see for someone who is discerning.

I suppose we have a lot in common.

Another Flagpole Lie wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Ha! I actually have NOT listened to CNN today and did not get this question or any thoughts about it from anyone. It's a reasonable question at this point.

You know that no one actually believes you, right?

If the poster was right that it was on CNN, you know that's where you got it. Man up for once. It's okay to say you got your opinion from the networks or papers. It's not alright to pass it off as your own.

Your wrong.

I admit I'm an MSNBC junkie.

There have been many many time where I've listened to a knowledgeable guest on MSNBC and then see Flagpole post the same thing sometime later.

He's a MSNBC man.

Not a CNN man.

Your Wrong wrote:

I admit I'm an MSNBC junkie.

There have been many many time where I've listened to a knowledgeable guest on MSNBC and then see Flagpole post the same thing sometime later.

He's a MSNBC man.

Not a CNN man.

0/10, brah

I tire of you. Now's time on Sprockets vhen ve dance!

Flagpole wrote:

Another Flagpole Lie wrote:

I suppose we have a lot in common.

I tire of you. Now's time on Sprockets vhen ve dance!

I never tire of the truth. If there is one thing I can't stand is someone who lies.

Obama's lame speech today. He's trying to take credit for Trump's economy. He said that you needed a "magic wand" to bring these jobs back. He had the slowest recovery during a non-war time administration. He was the food stamps president. We now have 4 million off food stamps and the lowest jobless claims in 50 years.

Obama is a sorry little man, who recognizes that Trump has surpassed him in less than 2 years, and he's desperately trying to hold on to what little legacy he has left. Trump is on the verge of erasing his entire 8 year entirely. I's actually quite sad to watch...not really.

M-A-G-A!!!

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Obama's lame speech today. He's trying to take credit for Trump's economy. He said that you needed a "magic wand" to bring these jobs back. He had the slowest recovery during a non-war time administration. He was the food stamps president. We now have 4 million off food stamps and the lowest jobless claims in 50 years.

Obama is a sorry little man, who recognizes that Trump has surpassed him in less than 2 years, and he's desperately trying to hold on to what little legacy he has left. Trump is on the verge of erasing his entire 8 year entirely. I's actually quite sad to watch...not really.

M-A-G-A!!!

These two are battling it out for the worst US President ever.

Another Flagpole Lie wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I tire of you. Now's time on Sprockets vhen ve dance!

I never tire of the truth. If there is one thing I can't stand is someone who lies.

Well, then you CAN stand me, because I never lie.

Now's time on Sprockets vhen ve dance!

Flagpole wrote:

Another Flagpole Lie wrote:

I never tire of the truth. If there is one thing I can't stand is someone who lies.

Well, then you CAN stand me, because I never lie.

Now's time on Sprockets vhen ve dance!

Your Wrong wrote:

Another Flagpole Lie wrote:

You know that no one actually believes you, right?

If the poster was right that it was on CNN, you know that's where you got it. Man up for once. It's okay to say you got your opinion from the networks or papers. It's not alright to pass it off as your own.

Your wrong.

I admit I'm an MSNBC junkie.

There have been many many time where I've listened to a knowledgeable guest on MSNBC and then see Flagpole post the same thing sometime later.

He's a MSNBC man.

Not a CNN man.

Hmm...I appreciate you trying to get to the truth here, but I listen to things from many sources including Fox News, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh...gotta listen to the opposition to know how horrible they are (Glenn Beck is the biggest sell out of them all). I'm not an MSNBC man any more than a CNN man or an ABC, CBS, or NBC man. While I DO listen to Fox News to see what's going on over there, I will admit that I am NOT a Fox News man though Shep Smith and Chris Wallace are fair and reasonable, and lately Cavuto and even Hume have become more so.

If I had only ONE news source to listen to, it would be CNN.

The vast majority of the things I post here are my own original thoughts. If I don't necessarily agree with something I saw on a news show or read somewhere, but I think it is a good point, I will reference it.

Most of what I post here is a recounting of the facts and then my opinion on those facts. Obviously when we find out that Trump was an unindicted co-conspirator, I got that from a news source, and unless it is breaking news, there is no need to cite a reference there. My opinions on such facts though are always my own. I never parrot someone else's opinion because quite frankly, I can say it just as well or better.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Obama...recognizes that Trump has surpassed him in less than 2 years...

If you are referring to lying and criminal behavior, then that is HUGELY true...BIGLY even.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done...and we will see the progression toward absolutely unprecedented craziness meltdown before the end.