I gave a lengthy reply regarding his play. You spoke nearly nothing of tennis. Just your wild conjecture on your conspiracy theories. You did mention two things tennis related. Unforced areas and winning percentage. You were quickly proven to be lying about those things. So in your standard move you completely ignored it and spoke nothing of it again. You went back off the rails and stopped responding in a coherent manner within the confines of a back and forth conversation. You simply went back to talking to yourself like normal.
And I responded in kind! Winning percentage is lower, as another poster showed. You never showed me data on unforced errors.
Then you just started to repeat gold medal over and over, which, as I've said, proves that his poor form was caused by something other than age. Long COVID fits. Waiting for an alternative explanation.
I’ve clearly said he’s two percentage points better this year over last. Give your head a shake buddy.
I gave a lengthy reply regarding his play. You spoke nearly nothing of tennis. Just your wild conjecture on your conspiracy theories. You did mention two things tennis related. Unforced areas and winning percentage. You were quickly proven to be lying about those things. So in your standard move you completely ignored it and spoke nothing of it again. You went back off the rails and stopped responding in a coherent manner within the confines of a back and forth conversation. You simply went back to talking to yourself like normal.
And I responded in kind! Winning percentage is lower, as another poster showed. You never showed me data on unforced errors.
Then you just started to repeat gold medal over and over, which, as I've said, proves that his poor form was caused by something other than age. Long COVID fits. Waiting for an alternative explanation.
Your response had no mention of tennis. Just that what I said regarding his tennis is proof for your wild conspiracy theory. Look we get it, you don’t have an answer to these things because you’re not based in reality. Continual to flail around thinking that being stupidly stubborn is a win.
And I responded in kind! Winning percentage is lower, as another poster showed. You never showed me data on unforced errors.
Then you just started to repeat gold medal over and over, which, as I've said, proves that his poor form was caused by something other than age. Long COVID fits. Waiting for an alternative explanation.
Your response had no mention of tennis. Just that what I said regarding his tennis is proof for your wild conspiracy theory. Look we get it, you don’t have an answer to these things because you’re not based in reality. Continual to flail around thinking that being stupidly stubborn is a win.
I've carefully explained how each of your arguments fits with a long-COVID hypothesis. You've yet to provide any alternative explanation, let alone a refutation of my argument. I've never said my argument is conclusive, but you act like it's wildly absurd yet don't provide anything close to a refutation. I suggest you temper your tone.
As for the data, all I've seen is the winning % – feel free to post anything else.
Your response had no mention of tennis. Just that what I said regarding his tennis is proof for your wild conspiracy theory. Look we get it, you don’t have an answer to these things because you’re not based in reality. Continual to flail around thinking that being stupidly stubborn is a win.
I've carefully explained how each of your arguments fits with a long-COVID hypothesis. You've yet to provide any alternative explanation, let alone a refutation of my argument. I've never said my argument is conclusive, but you act like it's wildly absurd yet don't provide anything close to a refutation. I suggest you temper your tone.
As for the data, all I've seen is the winning % – feel free to post anything else.
His winning percentage has been within one percentage point over the course of the last 9 years. Year after year after year after year. His unforced errors are better this year than last. Irrefutable facts. As far as your willingness to just to the most unreasonable and impossible to prove theory, I don’t know what to make of such lunacy. I guess it’s a personal character flaw of yours. To be so wrapped up in a myopic world view that the only possible reason anything happens absolutely HAS to be tied back to your singular obsession. To do it without a data point. A shred of evidence. Heck even a compelling but wrong argument might even work. He tore his meniscus…..obviously long covid. By golly, you really can’t come up with anything halfway decent anymore. Meanwhile, us regular folks are just enjoying the heck out of the greatest to ever do it enjoying a long twilight stroll into the sunset. Forever remembered for putting an incredible stamp on his career in Paris. 21 years after entering the sport he is still at the very top. Absolutely incredible.
I've carefully explained how each of your arguments fits with a long-COVID hypothesis. You've yet to provide any alternative explanation, let alone a refutation of my argument. I've never said my argument is conclusive, but you act like it's wildly absurd yet don't provide anything close to a refutation. I suggest you temper your tone.
As for the data, all I've seen is the winning % – feel free to post anything else.
His winning percentage has been within one percentage point over the course of the last 9 years. Year after year after year after year. His unforced errors are better this year than last. Irrefutable facts. As far as your willingness to just to the most unreasonable and impossible to prove theory, I don’t know what to make of such lunacy. I guess it’s a personal character flaw of yours. To be so wrapped up in a myopic world view that the only possible reason anything happens absolutely HAS to be tied back to your singular obsession. To do it without a data point. A shred of evidence. Heck even a compelling but wrong argument might even work. He tore his meniscus…..obviously long covid. By golly, you really can’t come up with anything halfway decent anymore. Meanwhile, us regular folks are just enjoying the heck out of the greatest to ever do it enjoying a long twilight stroll into the sunset. Forever remembered for putting an incredible stamp on his career in Paris. 21 years after entering the sport he is still at the very top. Absolutely incredible.
We went over how small changes in winning % can be significant, I guess you already forgot. You still haven't actually posted any data on unforced errors.
All these data fit are characteristic of a transient, medium-term illness that caused poor play for many months. How many illness do you know that can strike for 8 months? Among the most prevalent of those right now, especially among the unvaccinated, is long COVID.
The more you explain to me, the more parsimonious my theory becomes.
His winning percentage has been within one percentage point over the course of the last 9 years. Year after year after year after year. His unforced errors are better this year than last. Irrefutable facts. As far as your willingness to just to the most unreasonable and impossible to prove theory, I don’t know what to make of such lunacy. I guess it’s a personal character flaw of yours. To be so wrapped up in a myopic world view that the only possible reason anything happens absolutely HAS to be tied back to your singular obsession. To do it without a data point. A shred of evidence. Heck even a compelling but wrong argument might even work. He tore his meniscus…..obviously long covid. By golly, you really can’t come up with anything halfway decent anymore. Meanwhile, us regular folks are just enjoying the heck out of the greatest to ever do it enjoying a long twilight stroll into the sunset. Forever remembered for putting an incredible stamp on his career in Paris. 21 years after entering the sport he is still at the very top. Absolutely incredible.
We went over how small changes in winning % can be significant, I guess you already forgot. You still haven't actually posted any data on unforced errors.
All these data fit are characteristic of a transient, medium-term illness that caused poor play for many months. How many illness do you know that can strike for 8 months? Among the most prevalent of those right now, especially among the unvaccinated, is long COVID.
The more you explain to me, the more parsimonious my theory becomes.
You can continue to ignore and bury your head in the sand. And you can continue to jump to the wildest conclusion possible. Have a blast. You choose not to recognize his unforced errors are better than last year, have a ball dude. There isn’t a response I can give to these idiotic responses of yours that just deny facts.
We went over how small changes in winning % can be significant, I guess you already forgot. You still haven't actually posted any data on unforced errors.
All these data fit are characteristic of a transient, medium-term illness that caused poor play for many months. How many illness do you know that can strike for 8 months? Among the most prevalent of those right now, especially among the unvaccinated, is long COVID.
The more you explain to me, the more parsimonious my theory becomes.
You can continue to ignore and bury your head in the sand. And you can continue to jump to the wildest conclusion possible. Have a blast. You choose not to recognize his unforced errors are better than last year, have a ball dude. There isn’t a response I can give to these idiotic responses of yours that just deny facts.
As much as you want it to be so, simply saying my argument is 'the wildest conclusion possible' doesn't make it.
The long COVID theory fits. You've yet to propose a valid alternative to his 8 months of poor play or attempt to refute mine. I do not dispute that Chokervic played well at the Olympics.
You can continue to ignore and bury your head in the sand. And you can continue to jump to the wildest conclusion possible. Have a blast. You choose not to recognize his unforced errors are better than last year, have a ball dude. There isn’t a response I can give to these idiotic responses of yours that just deny facts.
As much as you want it to be so, simply saying my argument is 'the wildest conclusion possible' doesn't make it.
The long COVID theory fits. You've yet to propose a valid alternative to his 8 months of poor play or attempt to refute mine. I do not dispute that Chokervic played well at the Olympics.
Statistical analysis has demonstrated that the last 8 months of his career is not statistically different from the rest of his career. Go ahead. Run the analysis yourself. The data is easily accessible. This fact makes any subsequent assessments by you irrelevant. It’s akin to saying the reason Hocker lost was because he screwed up his taper. Hocker didn’t lose so the rest is irrelevant. You keep being you though.
As much as you want it to be so, simply saying my argument is 'the wildest conclusion possible' doesn't make it.
The long COVID theory fits. You've yet to propose a valid alternative to his 8 months of poor play or attempt to refute mine. I do not dispute that Chokervic played well at the Olympics.
Statistical analysis has demonstrated that the last 8 months of his career is not statistically different from the rest of his career. Go ahead. Run the analysis yourself. The data is easily accessible. This fact makes any subsequent assessments by you irrelevant. It’s akin to saying the reason Hocker lost was because he screwed up his taper. Hocker didn’t lose so the rest is irrelevant. You keep being you though.
The statistical analysis in question: the 'because I said so' test. A classic in the literature.
Statistical analysis has demonstrated that the last 8 months of his career is not statistically different from the rest of his career. Go ahead. Run the analysis yourself. The data is easily accessible. This fact makes any subsequent assessments by you irrelevant. It’s akin to saying the reason Hocker lost was because he screwed up his taper. Hocker didn’t lose so the rest is irrelevant. You keep being you though.
The statistical analysis in question: the 'because I said so' test. A classic in the literature.
If you dispute the results feel free to run your own analysis. The data is easily accessible.
Btw is the “because I said so test” similar to the “because I said so diagnosis”?
The statistical analysis in question: the 'because I said so' test. A classic in the literature.
If you dispute the results feel free to run your own analysis. The data is easily accessible.
Btw is the “because I said so test” similar to the “because I said so diagnosis”?
Ok I ran it and it was significantly different. Looks like I’m right! My diagnosis is supported by observations and stats each of which I’ve outlined and you’ve not refuted.
I've carefully explained how each of your arguments fits with a long-COVID hypothesis. You've yet to provide any alternative explanation, let alone a refutation of my argument. I've never said my argument is conclusive, but you act like it's wildly absurd yet don't provide anything close to a refutation. I suggest you temper your tone.
As for the data, all I've seen is the winning % – feel free to post anything else.
His winning percentage has been within one percentage point over the course of the last 9 years. Year after year after year after year. His unforced errors are better this year than last. Irrefutable facts. As far as your willingness to just to the most unreasonable and impossible to prove theory, I don’t know what to make of such lunacy. I guess it’s a personal character flaw of yours. To be so wrapped up in a myopic world view that the only possible reason anything happens absolutely HAS to be tied back to your singular obsession. To do it without a data point. A shred of evidence. Heck even a compelling but wrong argument might even work. He tore his meniscus…..obviously long covid. By golly, you really can’t come up with anything halfway decent anymore. Meanwhile, us regular folks are just enjoying the heck out of the greatest to ever do it enjoying a long twilight stroll into the sunset. Forever remembered for putting an incredible stamp on his career in Paris. 21 years after entering the sport he is still at the very top. Absolutely incredible.
It is incredible. That's why it isn't believable. It's the usual story.
I haven't given mine. It has nothing to do with the thread subject - so your continued posting on the subject has derailed the thread. But I have observed you tossers are obsessed with gay-bashing. It goes with having no arguments beyond your homophobia.
I'm glad you aren't homophobic and are so secure in your homosexuality that you seek encounters on this website.
Since you keep going on about it then apparently so do you.
His winning percentage has been within one percentage point over the course of the last 9 years. Year after year after year after year. His unforced errors are better this year than last. Irrefutable facts. As far as your willingness to just to the most unreasonable and impossible to prove theory, I don’t know what to make of such lunacy. I guess it’s a personal character flaw of yours. To be so wrapped up in a myopic world view that the only possible reason anything happens absolutely HAS to be tied back to your singular obsession. To do it without a data point. A shred of evidence. Heck even a compelling but wrong argument might even work. He tore his meniscus…..obviously long covid. By golly, you really can’t come up with anything halfway decent anymore. Meanwhile, us regular folks are just enjoying the heck out of the greatest to ever do it enjoying a long twilight stroll into the sunset. Forever remembered for putting an incredible stamp on his career in Paris. 21 years after entering the sport he is still at the very top. Absolutely incredible.
We went over how small changes in winning % can be significant, I guess you already forgot. You still haven't actually posted any data on unforced errors.
All these data fit are characteristic of a transient, medium-term illness that caused poor play for many months. How many illness do you know that can strike for 8 months? Among the most prevalent of those right now, especially among the unvaccinated, is long COVID.
The more you explain to me, the more parsimonious my theory becomes.
Incredible how making a semifinal and final in two of the premier grand slams constitutes “poor play.”
Has Djokovic even tested positive for Covid recently? I mean, it has been traveling en masse around the Olympic Village. But I think the athletes are much better advised to worry about STDs.
If you dispute the results feel free to run your own analysis. The data is easily accessible.
Btw is the “because I said so test” similar to the “because I said so diagnosis”?
Ok I ran it and it was significantly different. Looks like I’m right! My diagnosis is supported by observations and stats each of which I’ve outlined and you’ve not refuted.
What test did you decide to run? I know before you were confused on how to handle the data.
Ok I ran it and it was significantly different. Looks like I’m right! My diagnosis is supported by observations and stats each of which I’ve outlined and you’ve not refuted.
What test did you decide to run? I know before you were confused on how to handle the data.
What was “significantly different”?
Winning %. I ran it and it was significantly lower in the 8 month period I diagnosed Chokervic.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.