This is why there are so many uninformed loonies that thought Ukraine was winning the war in the early weeks. Absurdly stupid.
Why are there so many uniformed loonies that listen to Jimmy Dore? I would rather crush my own testicles in a bench vice than listen to Jimmy Dore talk about any topic for 30 seconds.
Why are there so many uniformed loonies that listen to Jimmy Dore? I would rather crush my own testicles in a bench vice than listen to Jimmy Dore talk about any topic for 30 seconds.
No one cares what you think. No one cares what Jimmy Dore thinks (I disagree with most of his policy positions). What we care about are facts. Dore presents facts from other outlets pretty well.
You need to stop blindly defending ‘your side’ and realize you were lied to about this war from the start. You thought Ukraine was fighting Russia off. They were not. Russia is getting what they want. China, India, Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela, and most of the Middle East are aligning with Russia and the East, not the US and NATO.
We told you this months ago, but you didn’t listen, and now are forced to triple down on silly stories told to you by professional military industrial complex propagandists.
"Russia is getting what they want."
Razed cities.
Tens of thousands of women, children and old people raped/killed
Millions of refugees.
Tens of thousands of dead Russian men, close to a million casualties.
Huge portions of both Russian and Use stockpiles depleted.
Threat of nuclear war.
Expanded NATO.
Worldwide recession, hitting Russia first.
Only China and western munitions industry benefiting from all of this.
If you are trying to win over skeptics, you are doing so yelling from the bottom of a well of infinite moral corruption.
No one cares what you think. No one cares what Jimmy Dore thinks (I disagree with most of his policy positions). What we care about are facts. Dore presents facts from other outlets pretty well.
You need to stop blindly defending ‘your side’ and realize you were lied to about this war from the start. You thought Ukraine was fighting Russia off. They were not. Russia is getting what they want. China, India, Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela, and most of the Middle East are aligning with Russia and the East, not the US and NATO.
We told you this months ago, but you didn’t listen, and now are forced to triple down on silly stories told to you by professional military industrial complex propagandists.
"Russia is getting what they want."
Razed cities.
Tens of thousands of women, children and old people raped/killed
Millions of refugees.
Tens of thousands of dead Russian men, close to a million casualties.
Huge portions of both Russian and Use stockpiles depleted.
Threat of nuclear war.
Expanded NATO.
Worldwide recession, hitting Russia first.
Only China and western munitions industry benefiting from all of this.
If you are trying to win over skeptics, you are doing so yelling from the bottom of a well of infinite moral corruption.
Not sure why heartless’s posts were removed. I don’t agree with them, but don’t see anything violates the posting guidelines.
In particular, I disagree that Jimmy Dore presents facts. I think he presents a very limits and biased subset of “facts” that he knows his target audience will agree with. This is no different from the Daily Show, only without the humor. He offers no insight or analysis, because he doesn’t understand most of what he’s talking about.
If you think Russia successfully encircled Kyiv (yes, that was their objective), then I have family that lives there that would respectfully disagree. So, to say Russia’s military is performing at the level of a third-world sh*thole is not an exaggeration - in fact, it may be giving them too much credit.
Recent UK estimates are the more than half of the militias in Donetsk and Luhansk have been killed or wounded. That is a fact, but not one you’ll find Jimmy Dore talk about. What did he say about the Moskva sinking? Anything? Has he commented on how many Russian generals are now fertilizing the fields of Ukraine? I suppose not. Did he talk about Lithuania blocking transit of sanctioned goods to Kaliningrad? Or how the Kremlin whined about how Lithuania was being mean to poor little Russia? Has he blamed Putin for global food shortages? Has he talked about how many Nazis are in Russia (hint - far more than have lived in the Ukraine in the last 50 years). As I said, he presents a very small subset of information about topics he doesn’t understand.
Hey Carmine, did you figure out if you think Russia was right to invade Ukraine?
Tens of thousands of women, children and old people raped/killed
Millions of refugees.
Tens of thousands of dead Russian men, close to a million casualties.
Huge portions of both Russian and Use stockpiles depleted.
Threat of nuclear war.
Expanded NATO.
Worldwide recession, hitting Russia first.
Only China and western munitions industry benefiting from all of this.
If you are trying to win over skeptics, you are doing so yelling from the bottom of a well of infinite moral corruption.
Not sure why heartless’s posts were removed. I don’t agree with them, but don’t see anything violates the posting guidelines.
In particular, I disagree that Jimmy Dore presents facts. I think he presents a very limits and biased subset of “facts” that he knows his target audience will agree with. This is no different from the Daily Show, only without the humor. He offers no insight or analysis, because he doesn’t understand most of what he’s talking about.
If you think Russia successfully encircled Kyiv (yes, that was their objective), then I have family that lives there that would respectfully disagree. So, to say Russia’s military is performing at the level of a third-world sh*thole is not an exaggeration - in fact, it may be giving them too much credit.
Recent UK estimates are the more than half of the militias in Donetsk and Luhansk have been killed or wounded. That is a fact, but not one you’ll find Jimmy Dore talk about. What did he say about the Moskva sinking? Anything? Has he commented on how many Russian generals are now fertilizing the fields of Ukraine? I suppose not. Did he talk about Lithuania blocking transit of sanctioned goods to Kaliningrad? Or how the Kremlin whined about how Lithuania was being mean to poor little Russia? Has he blamed Putin for global food shortages? Has he talked about how many Nazis are in Russia (hint - far more than have lived in the Ukraine in the last 50 years). As I said, he presents a very small subset of information about topics he doesn’t understand.
Hey Carmine, did you figure out if you think Russia was right to invade Ukraine?
You know why they’re being removed.
When people can’t handle the truth nowadays, they try to eliminate the truth.
None of my links contain ANYTHING false or misleading. The last post removed contained a woman reading the joint statement from Russia and China just weeks prior to the invasion. It happened. Deal with it, folks.
Tens of thousands of women, children and old people raped/killed
Millions of refugees.
Tens of thousands of dead Russian men, close to a million casualties.
Huge portions of both Russian and Use stockpiles depleted.
Threat of nuclear war.
Expanded NATO.
Worldwide recession, hitting Russia first.
Only China and western munitions industry benefiting from all of this.
If you are trying to win over skeptics, you are doing so yelling from the bottom of a well of infinite moral corruption.
Not sure why heartless’s posts were removed. I don’t agree with them, but don’t see anything violates the posting guidelines.
In particular, I disagree that Jimmy Dore presents facts. I think he presents a very limits and biased subset of “facts” that he knows his target audience will agree with. This is no different from the Daily Show, only without the humor. He offers no insight or analysis, because he doesn’t understand most of what he’s talking about.
If you think Russia successfully encircled Kyiv (yes, that was their objective), then I have family that lives there that would respectfully disagree. So, to say Russia’s military is performing at the level of a third-world sh*thole is not an exaggeration - in fact, it may be giving them too much credit.
Recent UK estimates are the more than half of the militias in Donetsk and Luhansk have been killed or wounded. That is a fact, but not one you’ll find Jimmy Dore talk about. What did he say about the Moskva sinking? Anything? Has he commented on how many Russian generals are now fertilizing the fields of Ukraine? I suppose not. Did he talk about Lithuania blocking transit of sanctioned goods to Kaliningrad? Or how the Kremlin whined about how Lithuania was being mean to poor little Russia? Has he blamed Putin for global food shortages? Has he talked about how many Nazis are in Russia (hint - far more than have lived in the Ukraine in the last 50 years). As I said, he presents a very small subset of information about topics he doesn’t understand.
Hey Carmine, did you figure out if you think Russia was right to invade Ukraine?
Kim Iversen reviews Russia and China's friendship pact made February 4, and how it might currently affect Russia's invasion of Ukraine.About Rising: Rising i...
If you are trying to win over skeptics, you are doing so yelling from the bottom of a well of infinite moral corruption.
When it comes to the Ukraine conflict, many simplify the conflict as a Good-vs-Evil struggle.
But there is always context which ought to be understood.
Every event has an antecedents.
Good and Evil are matters of perspective. Depends who you ask. Regardless, no one is completely one or the either.
This recent article published by Politico explores this;
"Washington defends its sanctions on the grounds that they are necessary to punish countries that threaten the rules-based global order. For much of the Global South, this line of argument is hypocritical given Washington’s history of jettisoning these same principles when convenient. Consider NATO’s unlateral intervention in Kosovo in1999, which was undertaken without a U.N. Security Council resolution, as was the 2003 Iraq war — a preventive war of regime change launched based on the false claim that Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction. Add to that the 2011 intervention in Libya, which went beyond the terms of the U.N. Security Council Resolution of 1973, morphed into a war of regime change against Libyan dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi, and left behind political anarchy and contributed to a rise in terrorism across North Africa."
If you are trying to win over skeptics, you are doing so yelling from the bottom of a well of infinite moral corruption.
When it comes to the Ukraine conflict, many simplify the conflict as a Good-vs-Evil struggle.
But there is always context which ought to be understood.
Every event has an antecedents.
Good and Evil are matters of perspective. Depends who you ask. Regardless, no one is completely one or the either.
This recent article published by Politico explores this;
"Washington defends its sanctions on the grounds that they are necessary to punish countries that threaten the rules-based global order. For much of the Global South, this line of argument is hypocritical given Washington’s history of jettisoning these same principles when convenient. Consider NATO’s unlateral intervention in Kosovo in1999, which was undertaken without a U.N. Security Council resolution, as was the 2003 Iraq war — a preventive war of regime change launched based on the false claim that Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction. Add to that the 2011 intervention in Libya, which went beyond the terms of the U.N. Security Council Resolution of 1973, morphed into a war of regime change against Libyan dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi, and left behind political anarchy and contributed to a rise in terrorism across North Africa."
USA, EU nations, rich Asian countries and Australia/NZ will provide Ukraine with enough military equipment and support to bleed Russia dry of its military equipment and personnel.
The Ukraine is being flooded with free (or essentially-free) weapons, but it's like chemotherapy for a Stage 4 cancer patient. Not a cure - you're just buying time and protracting suffering.
The only way Russians will cede control of occupied Ukrainian territory is with direct Western military intervention. In other words, World War III. Those are the cold, hard facts.
America's allies are beginning to realise it;
"The precipitous and chaotic American abandonment of Afghanistan, without proper consultation and support for allies, less than a year ago was a great shock to the NATO alliance, raising grave doubts about the judgment, stability and reliability of the U.S. as leader of the free world. The resulting cracks in the alliance were only papered over by the blunt truth that our allies had nowhere to go outside the security umbrella provided by the U.S. under Article 5.
Now, in the rapidly changing landscape of the Ukraine war, we are seeing ominous signs that the U.S. may be leading NATO in the direction of an even worse strategic humiliation — one that can result in a dramatic reconfiguration of the world’s geopolitical structure."
The precipitous and chaotic American abandonment of Afghanistan, without proper consultation and support for allies, less than a year ago was a great shock to the NATO alliance, raising grave doubt…
USA, EU nations, rich Asian countries and Australia/NZ will provide Ukraine with enough military equipment and support to bleed Russia dry of its military equipment and personnel.
The Ukraine is being flooded with free (or essentially-free) weapons, but it's like chemotherapy for a Stage 4 cancer patient. Not a cure - you're just buying time and protracting suffering.
The only way Russians will cede control of occupied Ukrainian territory is with direct Western military intervention. In other words, World War III. Those are the cold, hard facts.
America's allies are beginning to realise it;
"The precipitous and chaotic American abandonment of Afghanistan, without proper consultation and support for allies, less than a year ago was a great shock to the NATO alliance, raising grave doubts about the judgment, stability and reliability of the U.S. as leader of the free world. The resulting cracks in the alliance were only papered over by the blunt truth that our allies had nowhere to go outside the security umbrella provided by the U.S. under Article 5.
Now, in the rapidly changing landscape of the Ukraine war, we are seeing ominous signs that the U.S. may be leading NATO in the direction of an even worse strategic humiliation — one that can result in a dramatic reconfiguration of the world’s geopolitical structure."
So would you advocate for direct NATO intervention? If the US/NATO wanted to, they could crush Russia in a week. It would dramatically escalate the confrontation, and increase the risk of Russia going full nuclear clown show. So, perhaps the slow bleed is the best approach to dismantling the Russian war machine (as dysfunctional as it is).
Or, you think Ukraine should just surrender? As a moral absolutist, I’m surprised your conscious can fathom such an outcome.
When it comes to the Ukraine conflict, many simplify the conflict as a Good-vs-Evil struggle.
But there is always context which ought to be understood.
Every event has an antecedents.
Good and Evil are matters of perspective. Depends who you ask. Regardless, no one is completely one or the either.
This recent article published by Politico explores this;
"Washington defends its sanctions on the grounds that they are necessary to punish countries that threaten the rules-based global order. For much of the Global South, this line of argument is hypocritical given Washington’s history of jettisoning these same principles when convenient. Consider NATO’s unlateral intervention in Kosovo in1999, which was undertaken without a U.N. Security Council resolution, as was the 2003 Iraq war — a preventive war of regime change launched based on the false claim that Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction. Add to that the 2011 intervention in Libya, which went beyond the terms of the U.N. Security Council Resolution of 1973, morphed into a war of regime change against Libyan dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi, and left behind political anarchy and contributed to a rise in terrorism across North Africa."
Did you figure out what the Russian “rescue” tugboat that Ukraine recently sank was rescuing?
You've polluted this thread with uncounted disingenuous, taunting posts.
Since this is the second or third time you've asked an easily-answered question, "Rescue Tug" is standard nomenclature for the class/type of vessel which was attacked. From Wiki:
"Vasily Bekh was a rescue tug built to tow ships in distress, fight fires at sea, supply water and electricity to other ships, evacuate injured personnel, and act as a diving rescue platform."
It is claimed by the Ukraine side, and sometimes cited as fact in MSM, that the ship was ferrying weapons and soldiers when sunk.
Such a claim seems presumptive and excusatory, however, as no manifest has been shared, nor reasonably could be.
USA, EU nations, rich Asian countries and Australia/NZ will provide Ukraine with enough military equipment and support to bleed Russia dry of its military equipment and personnel.
The Ukraine is being flooded with free (or essentially-free) weapons, but it's like chemotherapy for a Stage 4 cancer patient. Not a cure - you're just buying time and protracting suffering.
The only way Russians will cede control of occupied Ukrainian territory is with direct Western military intervention. In other words, World War III. Those are the cold, hard facts.
America's allies are beginning to realise it;
"The precipitous and chaotic American abandonment of Afghanistan, without proper consultation and support for allies, less than a year ago was a great shock to the NATO alliance, raising grave doubts about the judgment, stability and reliability of the U.S. as leader of the free world. The resulting cracks in the alliance were only papered over by the blunt truth that our allies had nowhere to go outside the security umbrella provided by the U.S. under Article 5.
Now, in the rapidly changing landscape of the Ukraine war, we are seeing ominous signs that the U.S. may be leading NATO in the direction of an even worse strategic humiliation — one that can result in a dramatic reconfiguration of the world’s geopolitical structure."
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
