hm okay.... wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
If what Canova says isn't a "why", what is it, and why (sorry) is it in the same sentence? No need to answer that. I guess you can take a horse to water, as they say.
His inability to run a 1:42 is a reason for him to focus on the 5000m, you moron....
Well that I agree with but it isn't what Canova said. You're welcome.
hm okay.... wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
It is difficult discussing some subjects with those who apparently struggle with the English language. But here goes - I have several times said Jakob's best events are the longer distances, that I consider him currently to be a 1500/5k runner. There I would agree with you. That is also why I don't think he will run at an equivalent level over 800 - and not simply because he may not train specifically for the shorter event.
However, where I differ with some like Canova is that I don't think it is only training that would prevent Jakob from running 1.42. I don't think he has the speed. I would be surprised if he ever gets below 1.45.
Where did Canova say it's only his training that will prevent him from running 1:42? I have very few issues understanding Canova because my reading comprehension is better than the average 5th grader.
Your English is apparently the same as someone who isn't a native speaker. I have quoted Canova's sentence but the gist of what he says eludes even you it seems. Just ignore the part where he talks about "training" - it simply confuses you.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Well that I agree with but it isn't what Canova said. You're welcome.
It literally is what he said. No one else has an issue reading it except you. You're wrong, just accept it.
hm okay.... wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Well that I agree with but it isn't what Canova said. You're welcome.
It literally is what he said. No one else has an issue reading it except you. You're wrong, just accept it.
Truth by popular vote? I dont think anyone bar you and one other care enough to respond to what he, or I, have to say. But I accept that you are doing the best with your limitations.
Finish to interpretate my words. I want to be clear : Jakob doesn't have the qualities for running not 1'42", but also under 1'44". He has a very high speed for unning (and winning) competitions of 5000 and 10000m. Also, I know perswonally two Kenyans who can be ALWAYS faster than him in 1500m, IF and WHEN they are in top shape (and without doping).
Armstronglivs, is now everything clear also for you ?
Renato Canova wrote:
Finish to interpretate my words. I want to be clear : Jakob doesn't have the qualities for running not 1'42", but also under 1'44". He has a very high speed for unning (and winning) competitions of 5000 and 10000m. Also, I know perswonally two Kenyans who can be ALWAYS faster than him in 1500m, IF and WHEN they are in top shape (and without doping).
Armstronglivs, is now everything clear also for you ?
Well, now we are in agreement. No - Jakob won't run under 1.44, let alone run 1.42. He is, as you say, better suited to the longer events. I also agree that he will unlikely be the best over 1500.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Renato Canova wrote:
Finish to interpretate my words. I want to be clear : Jakob doesn't have the qualities for running not 1'42", but also under 1'44". He has a very high speed for unning (and winning) competitions of 5000 and 10000m. Also, I know perswonally two Kenyans who can be ALWAYS faster than him in 1500m, IF and WHEN they are in top shape (and without doping).
Armstronglivs, is now everything clear also for you ?
Well, now we are in agreement. No - Jakob won't run under 1.44, let alone run 1.42. He is, as you say, better suited to the longer events. I also agree that he will unlikely be the best over 1500.
Armstronglivs, you need to learn how to read.
It says in the video above that Jakob has no plans to run a 1500m this season. I guess that must mean he will run the 5000m in Monaco?
This post was removed.
Armstronglivs wrote:
spot on! wrote:
Armstronglivs, you need to learn how to read.
I see you've just learned how to write. Congratulations.
Whoever told you your comebacks were witty/funny has lied to you.
Spokane secret A. Crest FKT wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I see you've just learned how to write. Congratulations.
Whoever told you your comebacks were witty/funny has lied to you.
I guarantee you no one has ever said that to him. He is the only person who thinks he's clever.
The funny thing is that no matter the thread topic, this guy pretends he's an expert, talks down to anyone with whom he disagrees, and refuses to admit when he's wrong.
This post was removed.
This post was removed.
Renato Canova wrote:
Also, I know perswonally two Kenyans who can be ALWAYS faster than him in 1500m, IF and WHEN they are in top shape (and without doping).
I presume Ronald is one of those two?
What if Jakob runs a low 3:28...
Thank you for enriching this forum giving us insight from a world class trainer perspective.
Coevett wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=334Ie4fGhl4It says in the video above that Jakob has no plans to run a 1500m this season. I guess that must mean he will run the 5000m in Monaco?
Is this a reliable source?
ex-runner wrote:
Is this a reliable source?
no, you can be absolutely sure he will run a 1500m if health and covid-situation is ok. Gjert signaled intent that Filip and Jakob would race 1500m in Monaco.
Spokane secret A. Crest FKT wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I see you've just learned how to write. Congratulations.
Whoever told you your comebacks were witty/funny has lied to you.
Reminder.