Watergate is NOTHING compared to the bomb that's about to drop on DC establishment

3. He joins 6/16

4. Trumps team vetted him shortly after, found out about his ties to FBI & Russia, fired him immediately.

He joined them and THEN they vetted him?

Shouldn't they vet him first?

So the Obama FBI used a "Title I" FISA Warrant (the kind they issue against actual spies) against the Trump Campaign before and after the election and STILL Mueller has NOTHING on Trump?

Meanwhile, we have a MOUNTAIN of evidence pointing back at actual Russia collusion between HRC/FBI/DOJ.

PIO! wrote:

Que pasa hombre wrote:

How are they third worlders?

They are black. How was that inference not obvious?

Just wanted to see if the ignoramus would admit to it. Cowards never do.

Akorn wrote:

Conspiracy nonsense leading to

6/16/16 - Page joins DJT as jr policy advisor

9/16/16 - Page fired for his involvement w/RUS

So Carter Page joined the campaign a week after Donald Jr, Manafort, and Kushner set up a meeting with the Russian lawyer, then Page was fired a few months later because of his his involvement with Russia.

How does that fit into the narrative?

Monkeys typing wrote:

Akorn wrote:

Conspiracy nonsense leading to

6/16/16 - Page joins DJT as jr policy advisor

9/16/16 - Page fired for his involvement w/RUS

So Carter Page joined the campaign a week after Donald Jr, Manafort, and Kushner set up a meeting with the Russian lawyer, then Page was fired a few months later because of his his involvement with Russia.

How does that fit into the narrative?

Page was only fired because his involvement with Russia was leaked. Otherwise, he will still be working for Trump.

Again, why is the left fighting desperately hard to cover for the deep state and corrupt FBI/DOJ? Why would you, ostensibly the party of "civil liberties," defend illegal surveillance on US citizens? Why are you not in favor of a thorough congressional investigation? What are you worried about that will be uncovered?

Is it perhaps that crimes where committed by Hillary and Obama?

Well now wrote:

Again, why is the left fighting desperately hard to cover for the deep state and corrupt FBI/DOJ? Why would you, ostensibly the party of "civil liberties," defend illegal surveillance on US citizens? Why are you not in favor of a thorough congressional investigation? What are you worried about that will be uncovered?

Is it perhaps that crimes where committed by Hillary and Obama?

I’ve not seen evidence that there was illegal surveillance. I’m supportive of a thorough investigation.

Hope this helps.

loca lib wrote:

Well now wrote:

Again, why is the left fighting desperately hard to cover for the deep state and corrupt FBI/DOJ? Why would you, ostensibly the party of "civil liberties," defend illegal surveillance on US citizens? Why are you not in favor of a thorough congressional investigation? What are you worried about that will be uncovered?

Is it perhaps that crimes where committed by Hillary and Obama?

I’ve not seen evidence that there was illegal surveillance. I’m supportive of a thorough investigation.

Hope this helps.

Most honest answer I've seen by a dem so far. Re evidence: I think the fact that McCabe was fired for the whole fake dossier/FISA warrant, plus mountains of evidence through text messages and emails is pretty clear.

What is it with you fascist voting to approve a law and then complain when it is applied as written. You guys do everything possible to get FISA law passed then go appes**t when law enforcement uses it. You're completely fine with a fascist state spying on American citizens until it bites you in the *ss.

I will boil it all down for you. Page worked for the fbi as an informant in the Russian case in 2013 to 2015. He worked for them again when the fbi used him as a mole into the trump campaign. Then they used him as an excuse to get a fisa warrant so they could spy on the campaign.

It’s right out of the fbi playbook of creating a crime with their under covers and then solving it. Google Garland Texas.

Well Well Now wrote:

What is it with you fascist voting to approve a law and then complain when it is applied as written. You guys do everything possible to get FISA law passed then go appes**t when law enforcement uses it. You're completely fine with a fascist state spying on American citizens until it bites you in the *ss.

WTF are you talking about? I am NOT okay with the federal government spying on US citizens. I don't give a f**k what political party is doing it. Do you even know what the FISA means? FOREIGN Intelligence Surveillance Act.

Funny how you mental midgets are fine with it used against domestic political opponents, but you lose your s**t if it's used against potential terrorists.

The bots aren't providing anything compelling or believable at this point. Time to reconfigure.

Ronald Dump wrote:

The bots aren't providing anything compelling or believable at this point. Time to reconfigure.

Quit getting all of your news from CNN and Instagram. You'd probably be shocked at what you'll learn.

Akorn wrote:

loca lib wrote:

I’ve not seen evidence that there was illegal surveillance. I’m supportive of a thorough investigation.

Hope this helps.

Most honest answer I've seen by a dem so far. Re evidence: I think the fact that McCabe was fired for the whole fake dossier/FISA warrant, plus mountains of evidence through text messages and emails is pretty clear.

I have not seen “mountains of evidence through text messages and emails” to support the claim that illegal surveillance occurred. That’s probably the disconnect.

Not a paid shill wrote:

Page worked for the fbi as an informant in the Russian case in 2013 to 2015. He worked for them again when the fbi used him as a mole into the trump campaign. Then they used him as an excuse to get a fisa warrant so they could spy on the campaign.

Wow....

And what *evidence* do you have of this vast, well organized conspiracy within DoJ/FBI?

Well now wrote:

Again, why is the left fighting desperately hard to cover for the deep state and corrupt FBI/DOJ? Why would you, ostensibly the party of "civil liberties," defend illegal surveillance on US citizens? Why are you not in favor of a thorough congressional investigation? What are you worried about that will be uncovered?

Is it perhaps that crimes where committed by Hillary and Obama?

Yes.....This could lead right to Obama....

Does anyone actually think that Obama had no idea this was going on?

Sally Yates was in the middle of it and she had daily briefings with Obama.

You think the Dems and media are freaking out now....Can you imagine if this leads to Obama?

Glad the idiotic racist could weigh in.

truthseakr wrote:

Well now wrote:

Again, why is the left fighting desperately hard to cover for the deep state and corrupt FBI/DOJ? Why would you, ostensibly the party of "civil liberties," defend illegal surveillance on US citizens? Why are you not in favor of a thorough congressional investigation? What are you worried about that will be uncovered?

Is it perhaps that crimes where committed by Hillary and Obama?

Yes.....This could lead right to Obama....

Does anyone actually think that Obama had no idea this was going on?

Sally Yates was in the middle of it and she had daily briefings with Obama.

You think the Dems and media are freaking out now....Can you imagine if this leads to Obama?

When that day comes, and it will soon, the media will bury it. If Obama gets charged with something, the media will circle the wagons to protect him like nothing we've ever seen in our lifetime.

Remember, there are two sets of justice in America. 1) The Liberal Elite, and 2) The rest of us

FelonDJT wrote:

Not a paid shill wrote:

Page worked for the fbi as an informant in the Russian case in 2013 to 2015. He worked for them again when the fbi used him as a mole into the trump campaign. Then they used him as an excuse to get a fisa warrant so they could spy on the campaign.

Wow....

And what *evidence* do you have of this vast, well organized conspiracy within DoJ/FBI?

Let's start with the Strozk texts where the FBI was clearly conspiring to come up with an insurance plan to deal with Trump if he got elected. The fact that an independent council can only be created to solve a crime, but no crime was specified for this independent council.