Transgender Athlete - Who Isn't Undergoing Hormone Treatment - Wins Connecticut Girls’ 100m And 200m State Titles

Only the most mentally-deranged liberals could possibly think this outcome is fair and just.

St. Ignatius of Antioch wrote:

Is it too hard not to willfully kill innocent human beings?

Next time, spare yourself the embarrassment of posting a bunch of faux-moralistic bullshit and irrelevant/misapplied statistics and just state your position: You don't like abortion, probably because you aren't sexually attractive but on the surface owing to religious dogma.

I realize it's difficult to admit to being ugly, a brainwashed fool, or both, but it would actually be better than wasting your time presenting porous and hysterical "evidence" for your moral stance.

You remind me of the vegans who eschew meat for ethical reasons but then start piling on nonsense science about how bad milk and meat are to justify your stance, It's not necessary, and it only invites people to mock you.

DiscoGary wrote:

I haven't won a single battle against the PC fascists so far, so having me in your corner doesn't count for much.

I don't want to go too far out on a limb here, but the fact that your posts mark you as raving, rambling, straw-manning, incoherent mess are probably one of the reasons for your poor win-loss record.

Double Dog wrote:

Only the most mentally-deranged liberals could possibly think this outcome is fair and just.

Liberals call conservatives "climate change deniers". Can conservatives call liberals "penis deniers"? Come on, the kid has a moustache.

Camille Piglia wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

I haven't won a single battle against the PC fascists so far, so having me in your corner doesn't count for much.

I don't want to go too far out on a limb here, but the fact that your posts mark you as raving, rambling, straw-manning, incoherent mess are probably one of the reasons for your poor win-loss record.

In a heated discussion about a change in high school sports that could absolutely destroy the integrity of women's athletics, you feel the need to attack two posters personally. Not their arguments, not the ideas they've put forth and not even some straw man, but just attack them personally.

St. Ignatius of Antioch is "ugly", which you somehow conclude on an anonymous message board. Or you're just engaging in the embarrassing patter (Burn! Roasted!) of an immature adolescent who is sure he's smarter than all the adults. This is the type of high level debate you'll hear at a high school lunch table filled with sophomores. Stop posting if you have nothing to add.

For those who attack DiscoGary, it should be pointed out that he warned that this result was coming. The day before yesterday - pre-election 2012 - this transmania wasn't an issue. Suddenly, immediately after the Obergefell vs Hodges decision in which 5 black robed oligarchs decreed that the Constitution implied a right no one had previously seen in 200 years, the Obama administration pivoted to this trans insanity. The lunacy of a boy competing in the girls division is the inevitable result. Gary was ahead of the curve in seeing this coming.

Pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Ugh Gary, no doubt you offended just about everyone.

It's not the athlete's job to change the federation.

Gary - You don't offend people with sense. Only leftist loonies like this clown.

Anyone denying that hard leftists are a bunch of fascists is delusional.

Gary talks some sense wrote:

Gary - You don't offend people with sense.

CrazyGary?

In your first sentence did you men to write "unfair?" I hope so!

You think girls high school sports are unimportant because... why? Girls high school sports don't matter? Boys aren't going to take away scholarships if they aren't taking female hormones?

Let's face it, most people don't even get an opportunity to play college sports. High school is the highest level most kids will get to compete. So the boy will be "happiest," as you say, running and winning against girls. But who is asking the girls what makes them happiest? The girls are being told that the happiness of boys supersedes their right to fair play and an honest opportunity for athletic accomplishment at the high school level.

Then, what if he decides to use hormones? Then it's somehow OK? It is still unfair to women and girls.There are more and more cases of boys being allowed to compete against girls, slowly normalizing this form of cheating, so that it will be easier and easier for the next boys who try to horn in where they do not belong. (For example did you know there are three -- count'em three -- all-male "women's" bike racing teams on the cycling circuit?) Whether they mean to cheat or truthfully believe they are female -- it doesn't matter. They're male and this alone disqualifies them from female sports.

No one takes women and girls seriously in sports. When people start debating this issue, it is often women/girls who are protesting and men/boys saying it doesn't really matter, and who are ready to hand girls sports over to boys. Men are more often hold positions of power in the governing bodies that make these ridiculous rules, saying that because males can be "sort-of female-ish," that makes it fair for them to compete against actual females. Men, we need your help. Please stand up for girls and women's sports. Stop saying high school sports don't matter. They matter so much to the kids participating in them. Even if high school sports are not going to result in a scholarship, prize money, fame, a lucrative endorsement deal -- high school sports matter so much to the kids who are participating. For many, it's their last go at competitive sports.

Women and girls have so few opportunities in sports as it is, while there are ample opportunities for men and boys. Please help us females hang on to what little we have. Please speak up so that males must compete in male divisions, and females only compete in female divisions.

And winning a state championship is a huge achievement for these kids .. so to say that being robbed of that opportunity, because adults let males compete against you is no big deal, is an insult.

exthrower wrote:

And liberals/regressive's think this guy is noble and heroic.....Do they have No common sense or rational thought?

Narcissists with a mutually beneficial relationship; they use each other for their own personal glorification. The transgender narcissist gets to use the genetic advantages of being a boy while simultaneously ignoring they even exist (delusional), just to win against girls. The SJW narcissist gets to virtue signal by supporting the cause (look at me, I'm so caring and enlightened!). On a deep, individual/personal level, they don't give two shits about each other. What they can personally reap from this nonsense, the coveted image they wish to project to the world to feed their narcissistic hunger... now that's what they care about.

Here's an article that (in the second half) details several men/boys competing against women/girls:

http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/03/female-athletes-crushed-by-women-who-were-once-men/

Probably the most physically dangerous example is men playing women's football.

If a person hated women's sports, liked to watch men beat up women, wanted to reduce opportunities for women and girls, this trend would be a great thing. For me, I love both women's and men's sports, but will never watch men take advantage of women in sports no matter how much crying and screaming and attacking there is from the very small PC crowd.

I'm a man and care about preserving the integrity of female sports, but your post blaming men for the injustice that currently exists is complete and utter B.S.

The far-left is mostly comprised of women and men who call themselves "feminists" but are really just pathetic cucks. The majority of Antifa's leaders and members are women. Most of the SJWs and posters that you see preening around on social media and posting in support of Caster Semenya on news articles are women. Women vote en masse, in Western countries, for "progressive" politicians who preach identity politics, which always place the rights of the "victim" class ahead of everyone else. All of the above is an extension of third wave feminism. Sometimes I admit that I'm tempted to take pleasure in what's happening to female sports, as women were largely behind the movement that victimized white males and the "patriarchy." For those women, yes, this is poetic justice. However, I realize that not all women fall into this category and, for them, I will stand up for what's right.

Yes, I will support the right of women to compete in fair sporting competitions right until the bitter end (win or lose) but, at a certain point, women themselves (and especially elite athletes) are going to have to stand up and be publicly heard if they want change to happen. I, for one, was extremely disappointed in athletes like Bishop and Martinez, who went along with the whole P.C. Semenya charade. I get that they're worried about losing their sponsorship but, like Prefontaine, sometimes you have to take a chance and stand up for your rights. The media attention that they would likely receive - even though largely negative - could well improve their chances of being sponsored by businesses other than Nike. We all know that Nike is 100% in support of SJW lunacy, but the average American consumer is not. Linking a company's brand to an outspoken athlete who takes on the SJW numbskulls would undoubtedly be great for many companies' bottom lines - especially if there is heavy media exposure.

Trans in Iran wrote:

Transsexualism is actually somewhat accepted in a number of Muslim countries, including Iran, which performs more sex changes operations than any other country in the world with the exception of Thailand. Granted, part of this is due to the fact that sex change operations are viewed as a cure for homosexuality. Still, for whatever reason, the Islamic faith does not universally view transgenderism as sinful.

I had no idea that Iran had become so bourgeois. At least their neighbors realize that stoning is much cheaper and swifter.

Simple question - does Cromwell's Yearwood still have a penis?

End of story. What else needs to be discussed?

Monkeys typing wrote:

Simple question - does Cromwell's Yearwood still have a penis?

End of story. What else needs to be discussed?

Also, pics?

Monkeys typing wrote:

Simple question - does Cromwell's Yearwood still have a penis?

End of story. What else needs to be discussed?

It wouldn't matter. Even if you whack off the Johnson, you are still genetically a male.

This whole thing is a joke, and the brother doing this is one shameless gay guy. Period.

I think the real problem are his parents. In an interview, the dad said he did consider the fairness of it, but that in the end all he cared about was that his child was doing things that made the child happy. Where do you go with that kind of an attitude?

I want to claim the world record for the woman with the biggest set of hanging balls. Don't any of you DARE challenge me!