America has always done the best with a divided government that worked together. Reagan had a Democrat congress. Clinton had a Republican congress. Today's Democrats can't even stomach hearing an opposing POV as you can clearly see on this forum.
Also, CO is only blue because Californians moved in after fleeing their own policies in California.
If the left gets enough power the US turns into Venezuela where there's no where left to run.
My friend from Orange County CA also moved to CO. He says he is embarrassed to say he is from CA and always tells me that one should not vote in CO how people vote in CA or they will ruin the state. I agree with the sentiment that government works well with a divided government that works well together.
The GOP got absolutely DESTROYED in Colorado in the mid term elections.
Hope your friend who couldn’t cut it in OC is fitting in well 😏
So you finally googled the answer and figured it out. Good. See how what you posted earlier isn't the crux of the bill? It's also a lot more complicated than what's written in the article if you're a teacher but you're not bright enough to get the nuance.
I also posted nothing weighing whether I agreed with the bill or not. For the most part, this particular issue probably played less into the recent election cycle than the major shift is registered voters going from a majority Democrat to a majority Republican possibly from the migration of residents to the state, DeSantis keeping the state open (at least earlier) during Covid and his performance during the hurricane Ian.
So in your view Republicans swept the school board elections prior to the hurricane because of DeSantis' response to the hurricane.
Got it.
I'm glad you finally get something because you don't get anything else.
TAITR has no “spirituality.” You must be a bit slow. He converted to Catholicism so he could get a woman. Now he is attacking Democrats because he is easily influenced by Fox News and various empty headed talk show hosts. He has no thoughts of his own.
I have taken sh*ts more spiritual than you.
The most vapid people in the country are on your side...
Raging about my marriage isn't going to help you find a man.
Bezos wasn't "lucky," he was the smartest and most innovative entrepreneur at the time. He wasn't the only one trying to make a business off the internet at that time, he was just able to outcompete his competitors.
Read the actual article next time. It's just about Bezos being thankful for having a supportive family, nothing about being the only entrepreneur during the beginning of the internet.
So in your view Republicans swept the school board elections prior to the hurricane because of DeSantis' response to the hurricane.
Got it.
I'm glad you finally get something because you don't get anything else.
I honestly can't tell if you don't understand that the school board elections were before the hurricane or if you're just inventing your own reality rather than admit you were wrong... lol.
The burden of proof is on you to explain why the law is wrong.
About as statist and argument as one can make.
The burden should always be on the government to prove that restriction of rights is justified.
Is Academic Discussion "the government?" No, he's a guy on a message board, he doesn't have to justify anything. Also the guy who cheered on people losing their jobs because of government vaccine (which were untested at the time, and later proven not to prevent transmission) mandates talking about statism is hilarious.
The people of Florida support their Dept of Education's legislation that restricts teachers' abilities to talk about sex and gender ideology to small children without parental consent, as evidenced by Desantis being re-elected. This is how representative democracy works, Harambe.
So you finally googled the answer and figured it out. Good. See how what you posted earlier isn't the crux of the bill? It's also a lot more complicated than what's written in the article if you're a teacher but you're not bright enough to get the nuance.
I also posted nothing weighing whether I agreed with the bill or not. For the most part, this particular issue probably played less into the recent election cycle than the major shift is registered voters going from a majority Democrat to a majority Republican possibly from the migration of residents to the state, DeSantis keeping the state open (at least earlier) during Covid and his performance during the hurricane Ian.
So in your view Republicans swept the school board elections prior to the hurricane because of DeSantis' response to the hurricane.
Got it.
What you need to do is to re-google schoolboard elections instead of the NY Post to learn something about Florida schoolboard elections.
The burden should always be on the government to prove that restriction of rights is justified.
Is Academic Discussion "the government?" No, he's a guy on a message board, he doesn't have to justify anything. Also the guy who cheered on people losing their jobs because of government vaccine (which were untested at the time, and later proven not to prevent transmission) mandates talking about statism is hilarious.
The people of Florida support their Dept of Education's legislation that restricts teachers' abilities to talk about sex and gender ideology to small children without parental consent, as evidenced by Desantis being re-elected. This is how representative democracy works, Harambe.
Wrong all around.
1) The burden of proof is on the government -- i.e. the one restricting rights or those defending the government's actions. Any other argument is statist by definition.
2) There was never a federal vaccine mandate. There was always a testing exception. Private employers have always been allowed to set conditions of employment. Thinking otherwise is also statist.
3) Yes, the people of Florida are statist. The support the government removing rights without appropriate justification. If there is justification, let's see it. Deflecting the claim just makes you more statist.
Is Academic Discussion "the government?" No, he's a guy on a message board, he doesn't have to justify anything. Also the guy who cheered on people losing their jobs because of government vaccine (which were untested at the time, and later proven not to prevent transmission) mandates talking about statism is hilarious.
The people of Florida support their Dept of Education's legislation that restricts teachers' abilities to talk about sex and gender ideology to small children without parental consent, as evidenced by Desantis being re-elected. This is how representative democracy works, Harambe.
Wrong all around.
1) The burden of proof is on the government -- i.e. the one restricting rights or those defending the government's actions. Any other argument is statist by definition.
2) There was never a federal vaccine mandate. There was always a testing exception. Private employers have always been allowed to set conditions of employment. Thinking otherwise is also statist.
3) Yes, the people of Florida are statist. The support the government removing rights without appropriate justification. If there is justification, let's see it. Deflecting the claim just makes you more statist.
The school is the government.
A law that restricts the government's ability to indoctrinate children against the wishes of the parents is not restricting any individuals rights.
There was absolutely a Federal vaccine mandate for the military and federal workers. Plenty of private employers followed suit because of the federal mandate.
Is Academic Discussion "the government?" No, he's a guy on a message board, he doesn't have to justify anything. Also the guy who cheered on people losing their jobs because of government vaccine (which were untested at the time, and later proven not to prevent transmission) mandates talking about statism is hilarious.
The people of Florida support their Dept of Education's legislation that restricts teachers' abilities to talk about sex and gender ideology to small children without parental consent, as evidenced by Desantis being re-elected. This is how representative democracy works, Harambe.
Wrong all around.
1) The burden of proof is on the government -- i.e. the one restricting rights or those defending the government's actions. Any other argument is statist by definition.
2) There was never a federal vaccine mandate. There was always a testing exception. Private employers have always been allowed to set conditions of employment. Thinking otherwise is also statist.
3) Yes, the people of Florida are statist. The support the government removing rights without appropriate justification. If there is justification, let's see it. Deflecting the claim just makes you more statist.
Your ignorance and arrogance on ALL subjects is truly astounding-- bravo for that, at least, or as we say in New York, "Excelsior!"
Now explain New York City's private employer mandate for us one which-- despite its rank unconstitutionality-- almost NO Democrats in the state criticized, even though no neighboring cities were so dumb stupid or anti-Science to attempt similar strictures.
Bonus Q: How many Floridians moved to NYC in the last year for "freedom"? Last time I was in St. Petersburg, there were TONS of happy gay people, and just a bit north, in Pinellas Park, TONS of happy Vietnamese immigrants (to name on of Tampa-St Pete's many ethnic groups) and their children... Not that the Vietnamese know anything about "freedom," of course!
DTrump is an anchor dragging the GOP down. He was and has never been a conservative, nor a Republican. Trump only cares about Trump, the GOP is just a means to an end.
Dude is a loser. He lost the House, lost the Senate, and lost the White House.
GOP shouldn't hitch their ride to a loser like Trump. He appeals to a small vocal minority of idiots. To anyone with a brain he is repulsive.
1) The burden of proof is on the government -- i.e. the one restricting rights or those defending the government's actions. Any other argument is statist by definition.
2) There was never a federal vaccine mandate. There was always a testing exception. Private employers have always been allowed to set conditions of employment. Thinking otherwise is also statist.
3) Yes, the people of Florida are statist. The support the government removing rights without appropriate justification. If there is justification, let's see it. Deflecting the claim just makes you more statist.
Your ignorance and arrogance on ALL subjects is truly astounding-- bravo for that, at least, or as we say in New York, "Excelsior!"
Now explain New York City's private employer mandate for us one which-- despite its rank unconstitutionality-- almost NO Democrats in the state criticized, even though no neighboring cities were so dumb stupid or anti-Science to attempt similar strictures.
Bonus Q: How many Floridians moved to NYC in the last year for "freedom"? Last time I was in St. Petersburg, there were TONS of happy gay people, and just a bit north, in Pinellas Park, TONS of happy Vietnamese immigrants (to name on of Tampa-St Pete's many ethnic groups) and their children... Not that the Vietnamese know anything about "freedom," of course!
I didn't realize that NYC was now the federal government. Work on your reading comprehension, please.
DeSantis and Fauci are in business together now. Florida is no different from anywhere else.
A law that restricts the government's ability to indoctrinate children against the wishes of the parents is not restricting any individuals rights.
There was absolutely a Federal vaccine mandate for the military and federal workers. Plenty of private employers followed suit because of the federal mandate.
No this is also wrong. You guys are really falling short today.
The feds are well within their rights to set conditions of employment for federal employees. This is so obvious I am embarrassed for you that you think this is some clever argument.
The school laws restrict the speech of teachers. All I am saying is that such restrictions need to be justified. I am not even passing judgement on the law! I am merely responding to the moron (perhaps one of your sock puppets) that tried to put the burden of proof away from the government. That is statist.
So many bootlicking statists on here today, desperate to brag how much the love big daddy government telling them what to do. Gross.
A law that restricts the government's ability to indoctrinate children against the wishes of the parents is not restricting any individuals rights.
There was absolutely a Federal vaccine mandate for the military and federal workers. Plenty of private employers followed suit because of the federal mandate.
No this is also wrong. You guys are really falling short today.
The feds are well within their rights to set conditions of employment for federal employees. This is so obvious I am embarrassed for you that you think this is some clever argument.
The school laws restrict the speech of teachers. All I am saying is that such restrictions need to be justified. I am not even passing judgement on the law! I am merely responding to the moron (perhaps one of your sock puppets) that tried to put the burden of proof away from the government. That is statist.
So many bootlicking statists on here today, desperate to brag how much the love big daddy government telling them what to do. Gross.
Come on dude...
Teachers don't have freedom of speech in the classroom.
The school IS the government.
If you don't send your kid to school they can throw you in jail.
No this is also wrong. You guys are really falling short today.
The feds are well within their rights to set conditions of employment for federal employees. This is so obvious I am embarrassed for you that you think this is some clever argument.
The school laws restrict the speech of teachers. All I am saying is that such restrictions need to be justified. I am not even passing judgement on the law! I am merely responding to the moron (perhaps one of your sock puppets) that tried to put the burden of proof away from the government. That is statist.
So many bootlicking statists on here today, desperate to brag how much the love big daddy government telling them what to do. Gross.
Come on dude...
Teachers don't have freedom of speech in the classroom.
The school IS the government.
If you don't send your kid to school they can throw you in jail.
The school is the state.
You absolutely do not have to send your kid to public school or be thrown in jail. Completely busted argument.
The fact is the government needs justification to limit the rights of citizens. Is is never the other way around. We do not need to affirmatively defend rights to keep them -- although this is wise in practice because statists like yourself and other posters here would love to chain us down with all sorts of restrictive statutes.
Regardless of the outcome of the election, I want to see our country do well. That being said, the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over again expecting a different result. Hopefully they can learn from their economic mistakes over the past two years (but I highly doubt it) and get this country pointed in the right direction.
Teachers don't have freedom of speech in the classroom.
The school IS the government.
If you don't send your kid to school they can throw you in jail.
The school is the state.
You absolutely do not have to send your kid to public school or be thrown in jail. Completely busted argument.
The fact is the government needs justification to limit the rights of citizens. Is is never the other way around. We do not need to affirmatively defend rights to keep them -- although this is wise in practice because statists like yourself and other posters here would love to chain us down with all sorts of restrictive statutes.
You do if you can't afford otherwise. Stop being dishonest.
Teachers are STATE employees when they are at work. They do not have freedom of speech in the classroom.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
