DiscoGary wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
I AM a deranged lunatic.
I AM a deranged lunatic.
DiscoGary wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
I AM a deranged lunatic.
I AM a deranged lunatic.
DiscoGary wrote:
agip wrote:
hmm....Gary sees nothing wrong with Manafort cheating on his taxes. So....maybe...maybe....since gary is a corrupted soul with no judgment who sees nothing wrong with crime...we shouldn't listen to him anymore. Maybe when he says Trump did nothing wrong...he's just applying his criminal mindset to our president. Maybe Trump is equally guilty as Manafort but Gary just doesn't see anything wrong with it.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/03/politics/paul-manafort-trial-day-four/index.htmlOf course I've never said anything like that. You are a deranged lunatic.
I'll quote you: "Lighten his sentence for what? I don't think they've presented any evidence of wrong doing so far."
Clearly the government has presented much evidence of what I'd call wrong doing. But you don't think what manafort did was wrong. So you seem ok with crimes.
"Alexandria, Virginia (CNN)Paul Manafort's tax preparer told jurors Friday that the former Trump campaign chairman did not disclose his financial stake in foreign companies and repeatedly told his account he did not have bank accounts in foreign countries."
In her upcoming book, Unhinged, Omarosa, former Trump loyalist, tells it like it is.
“While watching the interview I realized that something real and serious was going on in Donald’s brain. His mental decline could not be denied. Many didn’t notice it as keenly as I did because I knew him way back when. They thought Trump was being Trump, off the cuff. But I knew something wasn’t right.”
Omarosa has also stated she would never vote for Trump again “in a million years.”
DiscoGary wrote:
Of course I've never said anything like that. You are a deranged lunatic.
Dear Deplorable Gary,
I don't know if what agip claims you said are exact quotes, but....
A) you've probably at least implied as much
B) you've defended virtually every single other thing Trump and his criminal swamp partners (like recently departed Pruitt) have done, so why not this too? (and are in fact defending Manafort like he is a completely innocent guy)
C) You're a big fan of Donald Trump. A BIG FAN. So considering that, how can you ever call out anyone ever again on supposedly not telling the truth? (I think agip was basically being truthful, but for the sake of argument, let's say not) You can't. Well you can't without being a mega-hypocrite. By adopting Trump as your hero, you've 100% adopted an anti-truth mindset (not that you weren't on board with it already). The guy is an absolute pathological exaggerator, fabricator, and liar. And you have not problem with any of it. You are the party of "alternative facts", statements made with later tacked on *'s ("not meant to be a factual statement"), and yes, no matter how much your side has tried to co-opt it, FAKE NEWS.
Republicans, Trump, and his supporters like yourself have pushed us headlong into the "post-truth" era. Are you sure this is where you want to be??
(of course it is, lying comes as naturally to you and Trump as breathing)
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Of course I've never said anything like that. You are a deranged lunatic.
Dear Deplorable Gary,
I don't know if what agip claims you said are exact quotes, but....
"Lighten his sentence for what? I don't think they've presented any evidence of wrong doing so far."
agip wrote:
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
Dear Deplorable Gary,
I don't know if what agip claims you said are exact quotes, but....
"Lighten his sentence for what? I don't think they've presented any evidence of wrong doing so far."
Right. I was saying I hadn't heard that they presented evidence. If they did then all you had to do was say what it was. I didn't say that I approved of breaking the law. You guys are just too damned stupid to hold up your end of a conversation.
DiscoGary wrote:
agip wrote:
"Lighten his sentence for what? I don't think they've presented any evidence of wrong doing so far."
Right. I was saying I hadn't heard that they presented evidence. If they did then all you had to do was say what it was. I didn't say that I approved of breaking the law. You guys are just too damned stupid to hold up your end of a conversation.
There is NOTHING that you will accept as "evidence". Your Trump Rat Maze will not let you.
DiscoGary wrote:
agip wrote:
"Lighten his sentence for what? I don't think they've presented any evidence of wrong doing so far."
Right. I was saying I hadn't heard that they presented evidence. If they did then all you had to do was say what it was. I didn't say that I approved of breaking the law. You guys are just too damned stupid to hold up your end of a conversation.
Oh.
Well we now agree that you regularly post comments without knowing the underlying facts. Thanks for agreeing.
And thanks for walking into that trap.
Hey when else do you argue without knowing anything? Often?
Yeah.
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Of course I've never said anything like that. You are a deranged lunatic.
Dear Deplorable Gary,
I don't know if what agip claims you said are exact quotes, but....
A) you've probably at least implied as much
B) you've defended virtually every single other thing Trump and his criminal swamp partners (like recently departed Pruitt) have done, so why not this too? (and are in fact defending Manafort like he is a completely innocent guy)
C) You're a big fan of Donald Trump. A BIG FAN. So considering that, how can you ever call out anyone ever again on supposedly not telling the truth? (I think agip was basically being truthful, but for the sake of argument, let's say not) You can't. Well you can't without being a mega-hypocrite. By adopting Trump as your hero, you've 100% adopted an anti-truth mindset (not that you weren't on board with it already). The guy is an absolute pathological exaggerator, fabricator, and liar. And you have not problem with any of it. You are the party of "alternative facts", statements made with later tacked on *'s ("not meant to be a factual statement"), and yes, no matter how much your side has tried to co-opt it, FAKE NEWS.
Republicans, Trump, and his supporters like yourself have pushed us headlong into the "post-truth" era. Are you sure this is where you want to be??
(of course it is, lying comes as naturally to you and Trump as breathing)
Hi Flagpole.
Howdy wrote:
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
Dear Deplorable Gary,
I don't know if what agip claims you said are exact quotes, but....
A) you've probably at least implied as much
B) you've defended virtually every single other thing Trump and his criminal swamp partners (like recently departed Pruitt) have done, so why not this too? (and are in fact defending Manafort like he is a completely innocent guy)
C) You're a big fan of Donald Trump. A BIG FAN. So considering that, how can you ever call out anyone ever again on supposedly not telling the truth? (I think agip was basically being truthful, but for the sake of argument, let's say not) You can't. Well you can't without being a mega-hypocrite. By adopting Trump as your hero, you've 100% adopted an anti-truth mindset (not that you weren't on board with it already). The guy is an absolute pathological exaggerator, fabricator, and liar. And you have not problem with any of it. You are the party of "alternative facts", statements made with later tacked on *'s ("not meant to be a factual statement"), and yes, no matter how much your side has tried to co-opt it, FAKE NEWS.
Republicans, Trump, and his supporters like yourself have pushed us headlong into the "post-truth" era. Are you sure this is where you want to be??
(of course it is, lying comes as naturally to you and Trump as breathing)
Hi Flagpole.
The T-Rex guy cannot possibly be Flagpole!
Flagpole has famously HUGE biceps. Whereas T-Rex? Well, let's just leave it at this:
https://www.earth.com/news/tyrannosaurus-rex-looked-like/What they found was FAR MORE valuable. How to cheat the census to cheat democratic states of federal money. And that focus their efforts on social media to persuade certain voters to vote their way, and other voters to not vote at all. And to look the other way when Russia interferes with elections as long as the interference favors Republicans.
Awsi Dooger wrote:
Big shock
http://www.startribune.com/report-trump-commission-did-not-find-widespread-voter-fraud/490018481/
DiscoGary wrote:
L L wrote:
Manafort can still make a deal to lighten his sentence if he can provide good dirt on Trump.
Seems like he isn't budging but they are parading him as an example of what could happen if you don't cooperate.
Flynn still has to go to trial.
Lighten his sentence for what? I don't think they've presented any evidence of wrong doing so far.
Why is it DG that you can never see a train coming? Manafort is going to go down for tax evasion and bank fraud and money laundering...perhaps something drops off that but he is very guilty, and they will get him. His accountant just testified that he lied on his taxes to the tune of a $500,000 gain for him in one instance. He is facing 300 years in prison. It will be less than that, but it is likely going to be the rest of his life as he is already pushing 70.
Oh, and in another trial they will get him for conspiracy.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Howdy wrote:
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
Dear Deplorable Gary,
I don't know if what agip claims you said are exact quotes, but....
A) you've probably at least implied as much
B) you've defended virtually every single other thing Trump and his criminal swamp partners (like recently departed Pruitt) have done, so why not this too? (and are in fact defending Manafort like he is a completely innocent guy)
C) You're a big fan of Donald Trump. A BIG FAN. So considering that, how can you ever call out anyone ever again on supposedly not telling the truth? (I think agip was basically being truthful, but for the sake of argument, let's say not) You can't. Well you can't without being a mega-hypocrite. By adopting Trump as your hero, you've 100% adopted an anti-truth mindset (not that you weren't on board with it already). The guy is an absolute pathological exaggerator, fabricator, and liar. And you have not problem with any of it. You are the party of "alternative facts", statements made with later tacked on *'s ("not meant to be a factual statement"), and yes, no matter how much your side has tried to co-opt it, FAKE NEWS.
Republicans, Trump, and his supporters like yourself have pushed us headlong into the "post-truth" era. Are you sure this is where you want to be??
(of course it is, lying comes as naturally to you and Trump as breathing)
Hi Flagpole.
Nope. Not me.
WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!
...Trump’s hands fused onto that dinosaur?
PIO! wrote:
Howdy wrote:
Hi Flagpole.
The T-Rex guy cannot possibly be Flagpole!
Flagpole has famously HUGE biceps. Whereas T-Rex? Well, let's just leave it at this:
https://www.earth.com/news/tyrannosaurus-rex-looked-like/
We need a fresh part 2 thread.
With all of these pages, this thread is slow to load.
Another cut and paste Trump endorsement tweet:
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1025728712560594946
Weak on border. If someone is opposed, like the majority of Americans, to the wall it doesn't mean they want an open border.
No politicion wants to repeal "your" 2nd amendment rights. The battle lines are more stringent background checks, magazine capacity and assault weapons.
Not sure what he means by weak on crime. Probation for murderers?
Can't he personalize his endorsement tweets?
More then likely right but the judge is clearly not thrilled with this case. No one touches Manafort if Trump isn’t President. If found guilty it wouldn’t surprise me if Manafort gets a light sentence or none at all because of the motivation surrounding this case. After that though, it moves to a liberal judge in dc where that woman will maximize the sentence for political purposes.
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
More then likely right but the judge is clearly not thrilled with this case. No one touches Manafort if Trump isn’t President. If found guilty it wouldn’t surprise me if Manafort gets a light sentence or none at all because of the motivation surrounding this case. After that though, it moves to a liberal judge in dc where that woman will maximize the sentence for political purposes.
Manafort's best defense, no matter the sentence received in either case, is a sure to be pardoned from the POTUS.
He will get convicted more then likely and once the Russia garbage is over he will get pardoned. Might take a year or two though.