Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Monkeys typing wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Good. I'm hoping people on both sides of the aisle can start defusing this bomb.

Does this mean you're willng to concede that she was responding in kind to alt right trolls who should also be condemned for race baiting?

No. That explanation doesn't explain anything. She was simply vicious and racist no matter what her reasons were. Period. I can't believe anyone is justifying this, especially from the Left. All you guys got going for you is the race hustle, and this neutralizes that weapon. If the NYT stands by this racist, it will be the best thing to happen to the country since Trump got elected. Someone at the Times is going to figure this out and they are probably going to fire her, not because she's an anti-white racist, but because openly accepting her destroys the narrative.

Flagpole wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

This IS bad and you libs will only get triggered if she was a conservative who made racist tweets against muslims, jews or blacks. So by your silence, you approve of her tweets.

Racist tweets are ALWAYS bad.

Has nothing really to do with the subject of this thread...Trump...a criminal in the White House who is closer every hour to his comeuppance.

It has everything to do with the subject of this thread because is demonstrates how elite Liberals have double standards at the NYT, the FBI, the Dept of Justice, etc, and how they don't seem aware of it.

Trollminator wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

So this whole thing is exploding bigly in real time now. Apparently the NYT is going to stand by this piece of human debris. She already passed their social media vetting, so they already knew about her near genocidal hatred for white people. The leader of the Main Stream Media is defending a genocidal racist. Wow! Things are getting very bad very quickly now.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/08/02/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-dumb-ss-f-ing-white-people/

Meh... it’s only exploding bigly in your trump bubble, no where else. You psychos have fallen so deeply for indentity politics that you have thrown anything “left” into the same bucket. I’m waiting for you to make the connection to HRC any second now. Get over it - Breitbart is a warmongering machine against anything minority, we don’t cry about it.

Typical liberal. Meh, that doesn't count. I don't like that link. But the links that I post...LOL!

You're exploding bigly over your Hillary bubble that popped 21 months ago. Tit for tat you small brained fat little man. Didn't get your monthly handout on the first of the month?

Your girl was more corrupt than your buddy Obama and that's saying something.

Still bugs ya, doesn't it? Can't sleep at night? Boyfriend gave up on you?

I'd bet dimes to dollars you're in your upper 40's to mid 50's. No friends except your cyber friends and your erroneous handles.

Glad you waste every single day on here, that's funny!

Minimal wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

We need Congress to enact a citizenship verification law in order to vote.

A complete waste of money. Voter fraud is a nothing-burger. Failure to secure elections from nefarious people --Trump and his people -- is the real election problem lies. Republicans refuse to spend a single dime to protect the 2018 elections. That is all you need to know about what they believe in -- election manipulation by Russia is okay as long as that helps Republicans "win" tainted elections.

Voter suppression is literally thousands of times more real and significant than voter fraud, yet somehow the publicity level is reversed. Republicans quietly scheme to suppress votes in state after state, particularly the ones in which they control all the branches of government plus secretary of state. They will cut back the number of voting machines in heavily minority districts. They get rid of early voting on Sunday to prevent the "Souls to the Polls" tradition of black churches. They impose restrictive voter ID laws to the point they actually brag about the strategic impact:

There are countless examples. Bush 43 never would have won Florida in 2000 and become president in the first place if his brother Jeb hadn't scrubbed the voter rolls of ex-felons beginning two years earlier. He used the infamous secretary of state Katherine Harris on the scheme, which was designed to remove African-Americans from the voter rolls and didn't care if they had committed felonies or not. If the name was the same they didn't bother to check. They'd remove them anyway, if the name, gender and race matched. Some of the people removed already had their voting rights legally restored, but then were removed again anyway during the purge, for no reason other than to aid the Republican cause.

Here's a segment of one related article:

"Of the “matches’ on these lists, the civil-rights commission estimated that at least 14 percent – or 8,000 voters, nearly 15 times Bush’s official margin of victory – were false. DBT claims it warned officials “a significant number of people who were not a felon would be included on the list”; but the state, the company now says, “wanted there to be more names than were actually verified.” Last May, Florida’s legislature barred Harris from using outside firms to build the purge list and ordered her to seek guidance from county elections officials. In defiance, Harris has rebuffed the counties and hired another firm, just in time for Jeb Bush’s reelection fight this fall."

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Racist tweets are ALWAYS bad.

Has nothing really to do with the subject of this thread...Trump...a criminal in the White House who is closer every hour to his comeuppance.

It has everything to do with the subject of this thread because is demonstrates how elite Liberals have double standards at the NYT, the FBI, the Dept of Justice, etc, and how they don't seem aware of it.

Ah I was waiting for you to do this grand extrapolation and generalization. Now because of NYT’s bad decision ALL elite liberals have double standards... and somehow you pulled the FBI and DOJ into it, as if all their leadership and culture carriers are elitist liberals and as if they have anything to do with the NYT. So bad hire at NYT = proof that elistist globalists part of the deep state are everywhere??? Only in your tiny brain.

After Bush won the 2000 election the Democrats claimed that he won because Republicans in FL kept minorities from getting to the polls. Well Micheal Moore took his film crew down to FL for the 2004 election to document all the voter suppression occurring against minorities. Remember the famous documentary Moore released about minority voter suppression in FL? No? That's because he didn't make it because he couldn't find any because it wasn't happening. Liberals tell each other these lies so often that they start believing it. The real voter suppression that occurred in FL was when Democrats threw out a whole bunch of military votes because of some paper work technicality. That's where the real sleaze was going on. Look it up.

Democrats, always guilty of the things they accuse others of doing.

DiscoGary wrote:

Monkeys typing wrote:

Does this mean you're willng to concede that she was responding in kind to alt right trolls who should also be condemned for race baiting?

No. That explanation doesn't explain anything. She was simply vicious and racist no matter what her reasons were. Period. I can't believe anyone is justifying this, especially from the Left. All you guys got going for you is the race hustle, and this neutralizes that weapon. If the NYT stands by this racist, it will be the best thing to happen to the country since Trump got elected. Someone at the Times is going to figure this out and they are probably going to fire her, not because she's an anti-white racist, but because openly accepting her destroys the narrative.

I'm not excusing her behavior, I'm asking you to explicitly recognize the context. I don't expect you to do so because "defusing this bomb" isn't what you want to happen. Quite the opposite in fact.

Trollminator wrote:

...

Ah I was waiting for you to do this grand extrapolation and generalization. Now because of NYT’s bad decision ALL elite liberals have double standards... and somehow you pulled the FBI and DOJ into it,

...

Yep. And this just adds fuel to the fire when Trump accuses the media of being partisan liars with no standards. The NYT will have no defense against that now. The mentality of the NYT leadership is EXACTLY the same mentality we see with Strzok, Comey, Mueller, etc. It all ties together.

Total BS if I've ever read BS before. Did your post make you feel smart? You're not. Obama pushed illegals to vote, go to YouTube and do you're own research. It's him, his mouth saying the words. Now you claim Republicans quietly scheme to suppress votes? You are literally insane! Commit yourself already and end it.

Hillary Clinton lost. You all thought that it was a SLAM DUNK, it wouldn't even be close. He wins and you're all looking for excuses. Your post is total BS and nothing more. She was suppose to CLEARLY win 7 of the states that she lost, it wasn't even suppose to be close. Now you HAVE to find a reason to justify it.

She was corrupt, regardless of her being charged or not. She stole and she lied. To not admit that says all anyone needs to know about you and your liberal friends.

Trollminator wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

It has everything to do with the subject of this thread because is demonstrates how elite Liberals have double standards at the NYT, the FBI, the Dept of Justice, etc, and how they don't seem aware of it.

Ah I was waiting for you to do this grand extrapolation and generalization. Now because of NYT’s bad decision ALL elite liberals have double standards... and somehow you pulled the FBI and DOJ into it, as if all their leadership and culture carriers are elitist liberals and as if they have anything to do with the NYT. So bad hire at NYT = proof that elistist globalists part of the deep state are everywhere??? Only in your tiny brain.

says Trollminator, King of Pea Brain-Idis! Ha! Dumbest left wing nut on this thread.

Monkeys typing wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

No. That explanation doesn't explain anything. She was simply vicious and racist no matter what her reasons were. Period. I can't believe anyone is justifying this, especially from the Left. All you guys got going for you is the race hustle, and this neutralizes that weapon. If the NYT stands by this racist, it will be the best thing to happen to the country since Trump got elected. Someone at the Times is going to figure this out and they are probably going to fire her, not because she's an anti-white racist, but because openly accepting her destroys the narrative.

I'm not excusing her behavior, I'm asking you to explicitly recognize the context. I don't expect you to do so because "defusing this bomb" isn't what you want to happen. Quite the opposite in fact.

I'm done playing your race hustle game. Just watch what happens.

Right like you believing Obama was not born in the US, that HRC Aided child sex trafficking, that 3 million illegals casted votes, that Antifa are Nazis and liberals are the most violent bunch, want me to keep going?

Go up 2 posts above yours. We can say the same thing about your claims. Are you really that ignorant?

L L wrote:

Trump keeps shouting there was no collusion.

No one has formally accused him of anything so why would he keep saying that?

So the idiots who are his minions will believe it to be true

Hardloper wrote:

I certainly average more than 10 posts per day. Exceeding 10 in a day isn't out of the ordinary for me. So I'd say more like 12,000 posts for me, just this thread.

Can you imagine pushing speculation and conspiracy theories that result in nothing by blatant lies by Trump for 2.5 years? Good lord I need a hobby --- beside my little jamin.

-- Hardloper

You have major issues, child.

DiscoGary wrote:

Yep. And this just adds fuel to the fire when TRUMP accuses the OTHERS of being partisan liars with no standards. TRUMP HAS no defense against that now. The mentality of the TRUMP leadership is EXACTLY the same mentality we SAW with HITLER, STALIN, MUSSOLINI, etc. It all ties together. TRUMP IS A BLATANT, DESPICABLE, HORRIBLE, RACIST, WHO CONSTANTLY LIES.

Oops. Trump should not have said that, "Jared has not been good for me." He pissed off his favorite, Ivanka. In response she takes two swipes at daddy on MSM.

Ivanka Trump says she doesn’t consider the media ‘the enemy of the people,’ AND disagrees with immigrant family separations.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ivanka-trump-says-she-doesnt-consider-the-media-the-enemy-of-the-people-disagrees-with-immigrant-family-separations/2018/08/02/66aa5a64-9655-11e8-a679-b09212fb69c2_story.html

10,000 postLoper wrote:

Hardloper wrote:

I certainly average more than 10 posts per day. Exceeding 10 in a day isn't out of the ordinary for me. So I'd say more like 12,000 posts for me, just this thread.

Can you imagine pushing speculation and conspiracy theories that result in nothing by blatant lies by Trump for 2.5 years? Good lord I need a hobby --- beside my little jamin.

-- Hardloper

You have major issues, child.

Ok, change your handle again flagpole:)

DiscoGary wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

K

Racism against whites is ridiculous. The vast majority of wealthy individuals and politicians are white and these people control the policies of our country. Racist comments against white people is like a Chihuahua trying to bite your foot.

Regarding her tweets they are a handful out of 103,000 and no context is provided.

Really? So those baseball players who are raked over the coals for their old tweets just need to provide some context and its all OK?

The baseball players apologized and said they no longer have those beliefs. It will blow over and they will remain on their teams.

With her, claims that it was out of context or that she was being sarcastic, are being rejected and what I assume to be conservative people want her to lose her new job. So with her, the reaction has been more harsh.