When this whole thing goes absolutely nowhere because it's the very definition of a nothingburger and anyone with an IQ over 35 can see it as such, will you reflect for a moment and ask yourself how you were so easily made a fool of?
Oh no, you will not. You will forget the whole thing and go on to swallow the next distraction.
What an existence!
The irony... you lefties bought the russia collusion distraction hook line and sinker and 10 years later you still have no idea it was BS.
This isnt going away.
Don't worry, Dee Dee. It's not that we are laughing with you. We are laughing AT you.
Trump is actually publicly coaching Republicans in front of a microphone on how to distract the press and the American people from his association with Epstein!
Hes outright telling them he wants them all to talk Obama to every question.
Imagine how little he thinks of his voters and the American people to publicly outline is strategy to cover up his oedophilia and role in trafficking
Trump is actually publicly coaching Republicans in front of a microphone on how to distract the press and the American people from his association with Epstein!
Hes outright telling them he wants them all to talk Obama to every question.
Imagine how little he thinks of his voters and the American people to publicly outline is strategy to cover up his oedophilia and role in trafficking
Who among us hasn’t had a bunch of young underage models as young as 16 years old to our residence to pose for us while we were on our 50’s?
And the only guest on the guest list besides the girls is your best pal who later became the most notorious child trafficking pedophile in history?
Nothingburger! Arrest Obama!
This is a bit of an aside but it is something that I can't quite fathom.
There seems to be this general belief that the very rich and powerful spend much of their time having sexual relations with underage girls (and boys?). The Trumpettes think it's the Libs who are primarily doing this. The non-Trumpettes seem to think it is the Trumpettes who are primarily doing this. But in both cases there seems to be this underlying assumption that such abominations are, and have been, taking place quite widely.
That is the thing I can't quite wrap my head around. If I imagine myself having $10 Billion and consider how my life might change, I tend to think of buying beautiful properties, traveling in luxury, buying a yacht and sailing around the world . . . There are many possibilities. But one of them is not abusing underage girls and young women.
Do people think that the truly wealthy and powerful are simply wired differently and are drawn to such behavior? Or do people think that something about becoming overly wealthy and powerful changes people in the direction of the abominable? Or would most people like to abuse girls and young women and I am simply the weirdo to whom this is just a disgusting and not at all a desirable thought?
This is a bit of an aside but it is something that I can't quite fathom.
There seems to be this general belief that the very rich and powerful spend much of their time having sexual relations with underage girls (and boys?). The Trumpettes think it's the Libs who are primarily doing this. The non-Trumpettes seem to think it is the Trumpettes who are primarily doing this. But in both cases there seems to be this underlying assumption that such abominations are, and have been, taking place quite widely.
That is the thing I can't quite wrap my head around. If I imagine myself having $10 Billion and consider how my life might change, I tend to think of buying beautiful properties, traveling in luxury, buying a yacht and sailing around the world . . . There are many possibilities. But one of them is not abusing underage girls and young women.
Do people think that the truly wealthy and powerful are simply wired differently and are drawn to such behavior? Or do people think that something about becoming overly wealthy and powerful changes people in the direction of the abominable? Or would most people like to abuse girls and young women and I am simply the weirdo to whom this is just a disgusting and not at all a desirable thought?
I just don't get it.
This is an example of "correlation doesn't equal causation." Being immensely wealthy doesn't make someone a psychopath, but there is a much higher prevalence of psychopathy among the ultra-rich and powerful. Being rich and powerful also makes it easier to evade justice.
This is an example of "correlation doesn't equal causation." Being immensely wealthy doesn't make someone a psychopath, but there is a much higher prevalence of psychopathy among the ultra-rich and powerful. Being rich and powerful also makes it easier to evade justice.
Agreed that it is Not So Obvious.
Certainly it is true that it is easier to evade justice when one is rich and powerful.
But there being "a much higher prevalence of psychopathy among the ultra-rich and powerful" seems highly speculative to me. Perhaps there is some evidence to back that up that I am simply unaware of.
This is an example of "correlation doesn't equal causation." Being immensely wealthy doesn't make someone a psychopath, but there is a much higher prevalence of psychopathy among the ultra-rich and powerful. Being rich and powerful also makes it easier to evade justice.
Agreed that it is Not So Obvious.
Certainly it is true that it is easier to evade justice when one is rich and powerful.
But there being "a much higher prevalence of psychopathy among the ultra-rich and powerful" seems highly speculative to me. Perhaps there is some evidence to back that up that I am simply unaware of.
My theory is that when you reach a level of wealth and power that most citizens can’t fathom, you have already had a routine of getting whatever in the world you desire, you just take it. Or buy it.
And because wealth = power you also have learned that you can cross the line legally and not have any consequences.
So the average guy might fly to Vegas to get his rocks off, but the rich guy needs to partake in something way more exclusive and desirable to him. The best of the best. A young 18 year old would be the choice of a perv that has it all. And hey, who cares if she is just a couple of years younger than 18?
I believe this is how these D-Bags think. And Epstein discovered it was a very lucrative business to cater to.
This is an example of "correlation doesn't equal causation." Being immensely wealthy doesn't make someone a psychopath, but there is a much higher prevalence of psychopathy among the ultra-rich and powerful. Being rich and powerful also makes it easier to evade justice.
Agreed that it is Not So Obvious.
Certainly it is true that it is easier to evade justice when one is rich and powerful.
But there being "a much higher prevalence of psychopathy among the ultra-rich and powerful" seems highly speculative to me. Perhaps there is some evidence to back that up that I am simply unaware of.
To some extent one must ignore the plight of others to amass billions for themself. That kind of money is ONLY made off leveraging the labor of others. While they may not start as sociopaths, they slowly become less and less bothered by poor working conditions and subsistence living of their employees as the amass profits. The more insulated they become using their money, the more abstract the idea of hurting their employees becomes.
Eventually billionaires conclude that they achieved their status due to hard work and genius while their employees are lazy an dumb and should be viewed with contempt.
The fact that they inherited millions or tens or hundreds of millions is a irrelevant starting point in their minds.
Some of these billionaires get so disgusted with the poor that they gain control of large media outlets and push a narrative that poor people are poor because they are lazy in a way that even the poor agree with. Then they push for tax breaks for the rich and pretend the subsequent investments will help those poor people. Next, they push to defund the welfare programs that their employees rely on. Then they push to cut public education because that is for poor lazy people. Nevermind that most of their employees function in their jobs due to public education.
The highly educated can see through this media blitz ruse and give evidence of its lies. Therefore elite educational institutes and law firms that back them must be taken down by billionaires.
Of course, simultaneously they are pouring money into electing candidates who will grant them tax havens, cut thos programs for the poor, and give them government contracts.
The people lose, bigly. The billionaires win by multiple orders of magnitude. The people cheer for their own demise because their billionaire controlled media tells them they won.
Certainly it is true that it is easier to evade justice when one is rich and powerful.
But there being "a much higher prevalence of psychopathy among the ultra-rich and powerful" seems highly speculative to me. Perhaps there is some evidence to back that up that I am simply unaware of.
To some extent one must ignore the plight of others to amass billions for themself. That kind of money is ONLY made off leveraging the labor of others. While they may not start as sociopaths, they slowly become less and less bothered by poor working conditions and subsistence living of their employees as the amass profits. The more insulated they become using their money, the more abstract the idea of hurting their employees becomes.
Eventually billionaires conclude that they achieved their status due to hard work and genius while their employees are lazy an dumb and should be viewed with contempt.
The fact that they inherited millions or tens or hundreds of millions is a irrelevant starting point in their minds.
Some of these billionaires get so disgusted with the poor that they gain control of large media outlets and push a narrative that poor people are poor because they are lazy in a way that even the poor agree with. Then they push for tax breaks for the rich and pretend the subsequent investments will help those poor people. Next, they push to defund the welfare programs that their employees rely on. Then they push to cut public education because that is for poor lazy people. Nevermind that most of their employees function in their jobs due to public education.
The highly educated can see through this media blitz ruse and give evidence of its lies. Therefore elite educational institutes and law firms that back them must be taken down by billionaires.
Of course, simultaneously they are pouring money into electing candidates who will grant them tax havens, cut thos programs for the poor, and give them government contracts.
The people lose, bigly. The billionaires win by multiple orders of magnitude. The people cheer for their own demise because their billionaire controlled media tells them they won.
Such a sad and naive take.
You dont hate billionaires (20% of which came from poverty) because youre "highly educated" you hate billionaires because youre bitter and jealous that your tiny life successes (if any) dont match up with your titanic ego.
