The truth is that the chain of custody of Hunter Biden's laptop is unknown and it was almost certainly tampered with after the date it was alleged to be dropped off.
Also, there was no clear chargeable offense arising from the e-mails, even if they are legit.
Also, this thread isn't about Hunter Biden.
Rudy Giuliana might be the least credible person in the world (and to think he was once universally admired) and he was a big big part of that chain. I have no idea what the liberal equivalent to Rudy is, but for my conservative friends just imagine the least credible person associated with the democrat party being the one giving those boxes to the FBI. So there's that.
And then there's this issue with HUNTER NOT BEING THE PRESIDENT. I could give two bleeps about Hunter. I could give two bleeps about Hillary. These people were never President. Oh, yeah, this thread is about Trump but reTrumplicans have no defense for his behavior so they justify it by saying others are also wrong. Lame.
The bombshell of the Hunter Biden laptop is about Joe Biden not Hunter Biden.
This constant refrain of Hunter not being the president just proves you have no idea what was on the laptop because you've been sheltered from it by the bubble you're entirely unaware you live in.
A law clerk! Wow - that's a real legal heavyweight! I wonder if he also happens to be a Republican.
The pool of legal people willing to debase themselves and their careers for Trump has shrunk considerably due to his election loss, his criminality widening as well as growing mental instability (see yesterday's demand to be declared winner). Today it is a legal clerk but tomorrow it might be Court custodians on Fox as legal experts.
I'm not a lawyer, so maybe someone can explain to me in simple terms how the "legal basis for the warrant" is allegedly flawed in light of the FBI finding improperly retained classified documents that were the basis of the warrant.
Rudy Giuliana might be the least credible person in the world (and to think he was once universally admired) and he was a big big part of that chain. I have no idea what the liberal equivalent to Rudy is, but for my conservative friends just imagine the least credible person associated with the democrat party being the one giving those boxes to the FBI. So there's that.
And then there's this issue with HUNTER NOT BEING THE PRESIDENT. I could give two bleeps about Hunter. I could give two bleeps about Hillary. These people were never President. Oh, yeah, this thread is about Trump but reTrumplicans have no defense for his behavior so they justify it by saying others are also wrong. Lame.
The bombshell of the Hunter Biden laptop is about Joe Biden not Hunter Biden.
This constant refrain of Hunter not being the president just proves you have no idea what was on the laptop because you've been sheltered from it by the bubble you're entirely unaware you live in.
The King Deflector admonishing others for supposedly Deflecting while also accusing others of lacking self awareness - you cant make this Sh!t up!
The bombshell of the Hunter Biden laptop is about Joe Biden not Hunter Biden.
This constant refrain of Hunter not being the president just proves you have no idea what was on the laptop because you've been sheltered from it by the bubble you're entirely unaware you live in.
The King Deflector admonishing others for supposedly Deflecting while also accusing others of lacking self awareness - you cant make this Sh!t up!
Please seek help bro!
You're name is "DonaldsTinyHands" and you think I'm the one who needs help. lol.
None of the 50 previous Trump "scandals" ended the way you thought they would.
I'm not a lawyer, so maybe someone can explain to me in simple terms how the "legal basis for the warrant" is allegedly flawed in light of the FBI finding improperly retained classified documents that were the basis of the warrant.
Sure, no problem.
The "legal" basis for the warrant is TOTALLY flawed! Have you not been paying attention!
Think DEEP STATE! IF your small brain can even think!
Hunter Biden's laptop, man!
Get your head out of your a$$!
If you weren't such a lying LIB!!! it would all be obvious to you.
Hillary Clinton's emails!!!!!
Something about Brandon!
Jeez, dude, stop watching your hero, Rachel and learn about the REAL world. You know, the one they don't teach you about in you fancy "universities".
Weird stuff. Did anyone watch this? The former clerk (Mike Davis) gets asked a question about the request for a Special Master, and appears to have forgotten the timing or prompts in the script, because he then recites a jumbled list of all the debunked, false, illogical and/or exaggerated defenses we've seen tossed out here -- I actually wondered for a second whether he copied it from this thread. He just goes straight to mash-up: delay is too long, Trump declassified, FBI/DOJ is out to get Trump, Trump gave documents back, Obama stole documents too, Hillary Clinton, Garland lied, Biden lied, affidavit is redacted, FBI trying to get back embarrassing documents. It was a Gish Gallop.
A law clerk! Wow - that's a real legal heavyweight! I wonder if he also happens to be a Republican.
Meanwhile, if the mop guy at a gas station has a negative story about Trump you consider irreproachable gospel.
Complete. Lack. Of. Self. Awareness.
I have no particular interest in what a mop guy says. But I am very interested in an unprecedented action by law enforcement against a former POTUS on the judicially approved grounds that crimes have likely been committed.
Hunter's Laptop is the holy grail of Right wing dreams and fantasies! It promises to do everything that a Trump worshiper wants and more!
Exonerates Trump and his spawn from all Criminality. Past, present and future.
Rights all the wrong of his embarrassing election loss.
Exonerates him from being a compromised Russian asset and dictator wannabe.
If only we can touch that secret magical device...All would be made right in the kingdom of M.a.ga. Red hats would be flung high in the air and the mouth breathers and neck beards would rejoice.
Weird stuff. Did anyone watch this? The former clerk (Mike Davis) gets asked a question about the request for a Special Master, and appears to have forgotten the timing or prompts in the script, because he then recites a jumbled list of all the debunked, false, illogical and/or exaggerated defenses we've seen tossed out here -- I actually wondered for a second whether he copied it from this thread. He just goes straight to mash-up: delay is too long, Trump declassified, FBI/DOJ is out to get Trump, Trump gave documents back, Obama stole documents too, Hillary Clinton, Garland lied, Biden lied, affidavit is redacted, FBI trying to get back embarrassing documents. It was a Gish Gallop.
So Carmine was right - kind of. It was a pile of lies. By the clerk.
Weird stuff. Did anyone watch this? The former clerk (Mike Davis) gets asked a question about the request for a Special Master, and appears to have forgotten the timing or prompts in the script, because he then recites a jumbled list of all the debunked, false, illogical and/or exaggerated defenses we've seen tossed out here -- I actually wondered for a second whether he copied it from this thread. He just goes straight to mash-up: delay is too long, Trump declassified, FBI/DOJ is out to get Trump, Trump gave documents back, Obama stole documents too, Hillary Clinton, Garland lied, Biden lied, affidavit is redacted, FBI trying to get back embarrassing documents. It was a Gish Gallop.
Not just a former SCOTUS clerk, but--more to the point--chief counsel for nominations for the Senate Judiciary Committee during the Trump administration i.e. when the SJC was chaired by the GOP. In other words, a Trump partisan and even more a RWNJ ideologue.
A telltale for desperation: mentioning that "those documents were declassified!" As has been pointed out on this thread already, the three laws at issue in this case DO NOT depend on the documents' classification status. They deal with obstruction, the illegal taking/keeping of government documents, and harm to the US/aid to an enemy. Even if Donald Trump had followed correct procedure and fully declassified every one of those documents, he *still* would be on the hook for those three laws.
Don't you love it how the toddler rants and raves about weaponizing the FBI and easily disproved conspiracy theories? From threatening parents and school board members, to instigating the riot at the nation's capitol, to the stealing of classified documents and selling them to hostile foreign nationals, of course his ass is going to be investigated by the FBI. Weaponized my arse.
Is Trump having trouble hiring lawyers to defend him from crime prosecutions, due to a nifty little thing called 'crime-fraud exemption to attorney-client privilege'? No shielding communications when they are discussing obstructing justice. Trump is usually obstructing justice if he is awake and not golfing. This is already affecting Trump's past communication with John Eastman in Jan 6 case. Nice article in wapo by Jennifer Rubin re this subject.
Is Trump having trouble hiring lawyers to defend him from crime prosecutions, due to a nifty little thing called 'crime-fraud exemption to attorney-client privilege'? No shielding communications when they are discussing obstructing justice. Trump is usually obstructing justice if he is awake and not golfing. This is already affecting Trump's past communication with John Eastman in Jan 6 case. Nice article in wapo by Jennifer Rubin re this subject.
That is one of the reasons. Failure to heed advice and failure to pay are others. His tendency to blame others for messes of his own creation probably is a factor as well. Plus most good lawyers like real stable geniuses for clients, not guys who latch on to conspiracy theories.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.