lolz
“Trump's ankles have become so thick and slow he's named them Eric and Don Jr”
-
142
-
El Runkin wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
Tulsi laid the word treason on a former US President. This is the largest political news story in History. Treason is no joke. That’s head on a stick talk. She is not messing around with you tools anymore.
Now it gets real.
For the few of you here inclined to actually read up on what you post about, here is what I believe to be the Gabbard Memorandum making news yesterday (she forgot to put a date on it).
I haven't fully analyzed it yet, but looks pretty hasty and amateurish. She actually uses the term "Deep State officials" as if it has real meaning outside of political speeches. It may take a few run throughs to figure out what she thinks she is saying about "suppression of intelligence" (which is kind of an oxymoron), because it's certainly not clear on a first read.
Tulsi Gabbard is the Director of National Intelligence, in case you are being misled. What you have read are unclassified documents. The real news is behind closed doors but Obama is oddly silent. He’s being accused of treason chap. and he’s not talking, he’s lawyering up. criminal style layers
013 -
Noyankee wrote:
El Runkin wrote:
Russia is an enemy of the United States of America.
Russia has spent enormous resources to try and corrupt and influence at least one U.S. national election. Russia violated US law in these efforts.
Russia has (illegally) spent enormous resources in America trying to spread Russia propaganda through American society by targeting Americans of a certain and specific mentality with that propaganda. There are many instances, including some in this thread, where Russia has been successful in that endeavor. Russia violated US law in these efforts.
this is what I know. Russia had zero influence on a single MAGA vote, that I know as well.
Jesus Christ, we're actually talking about Tulsi Gabbard here. She's the poster child for Russian-influenced MAGA voting. She changed her entire world view based on what Russians told her. You picked the absolute wrong time to make that statement above.
130 -
AOCIA wrote:
El Runkin wrote:
Russia is an enemy of the United States of America.
Russia has spent enormous resources to try and corrupt and influence at least one U.S. national election. Russia violated US law in these efforts.
Russia has (illegally) spent enormous resources in America trying to spread Russia propaganda through American society by targeting Americans of a certain and specific mentality with that propaganda. There are many instances, including some in this thread, where Russia has been successful in that endeavor. Russia violated US law in these efforts.
Of course the US has never done or attempted any of these things in Russia.
I certainly hope we have and continue to do so. But with a Russia-adjacent appeaser in office, I doubt we are doing so today. In fact, I think DOGE shut down all Russian counter-intelligence activity. We have gone nuts.
What's your perspective on why the Russia Ukraine war started?Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. That Russian military assault on Ukraine continues today. Russians have killed tens of thousands of Ukranian civilians and ruined the lives of millions more. Russians occupy many miles of Ukraine territory and tyrannize the Ukrainian locals in occupied land. Russians, including you, are scumbags with a pernicious serf mentality that makes them easily manipulable by Russian management. That latter point has been true for centuries.
That's my perspective in a nutshell. No one here has any interest in your perspective. We know where to find Kremlin sh!t if needed.
90 -
Head of ICE - "We will arrest anyone we find in the country illegally, even if they lack a criminal record. We're also cracking down on companies hiring unauthorized workers. Boom. America. We will not waver; we will not tire; we will not falter, and we will not fail.
011 -
Noyankee wrote:
El Runkin wrote:
For the few of you here inclined to actually read up on what you post about, here is what I believe to be the Gabbard Memorandum making news yesterday (she forgot to put a date on it).
I haven't fully analyzed it yet, but looks pretty hasty and amateurish. She actually uses the term "Deep State officials" as if it has real meaning outside of political speeches. It may take a few run throughs to figure out what she thinks she is saying about "suppression of intelligence" (which is kind of an oxymoron), because it's certainly not clear on a first read.
Tulsi Gabbard is the Director of National Intelligence, in case you are being misled. What you have read are unclassified documents. The real news is behind closed doors but Obama is oddly silent. He’s being accused of treason chap. and he’s not talking, he’s lawyering up. criminal style layers
No. You said "A sitting President accused of manufacturing evidence to prohibit the opposition candidate from power." I said I'm not seeing that accusation -- "manufacturing evidence" or "prohibiting power" -- anywhere in Gabbard's statement, or anywhere in her weird, undated "Memorandum," or anywhere in any of the documents she released (all of which I believe were released years ago) or in any of the media reporting on this that I've read, including Fox. Again, what are you reading or referring to? I can't find it.
That Gabbard Memo seriously looks like it was cobbled together by a high school student. It's retarded. Go read it and try to figure out what she's actually complaining about.
20 -
Just sayin\'... wrote:
Client Trump. wrote:
Release all of the Epstein Files and show them.
Of course, all of the Epstein stuff is itself a distraction--perhaps a distraction secretly welcomed--from the prospect of more than ten million Americans losing their healthcare.
Winner Winner Chicken Dinner!
It’s the Trump playbook since Day 1 of Term 1. Focus the public’s attention on juicy gossip and emotional issues distracting them from actual policy changes that effect them.
Rural school districts suffering because of federal grant cuts? Millions losing healthcare? Costs going up due to tariffs? Hey look at this Epstein stuff…..
Alan
100 -
Runningart2004 wrote:
Just sayin\'... wrote:
Of course, all of the Epstein stuff is itself a distraction--perhaps a distraction secretly welcomed--from the prospect of more than ten million Americans losing their healthcare.
Winner Winner Chicken Dinner!
It’s the Trump playbook since Day 1 of Term 1. Focus the public’s attention on juicy gossip and emotional issues distracting them from actual policy changes that effect them.
Rural school districts suffering because of federal grant cuts? Millions losing healthcare? Costs going up due to tariffs? Hey look at this Epstein stuff…..
Alan
And for those lucky enough to not lose healthcare will have to swallow 15 plus % rate increases due to Trump's meddling. This means all healthcare, the ACA (nee Romneycare), Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans ... nothing will escape Trump's attack on America.
90 -
Got4? wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
Winner Winner Chicken Dinner!
It’s the Trump playbook since Day 1 of Term 1. Focus the public’s attention on juicy gossip and emotional issues distracting them from actual policy changes that effect them.
Rural school districts suffering because of federal grant cuts? Millions losing healthcare? Costs going up due to tariffs? Hey look at this Epstein stuff…..
Alan
And for those lucky enough to not lose healthcare will have to swallow 15 plus % rate increases due to Trump's meddling. This means all healthcare, the ACA (nee Romneycare), Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans ... nothing will escape Trump's attack on America.
These cuts will mostly affect Trump voters, so who cares? Stop supporting the
welfareRed states and let them pay for their own terrible decisions. Worst case, I pay less in taxes. Best case, fewer GOP voters in the future.20 -
15
-
19
-
See tweet
Copy tweet
Paste tweet
133 -
Masked Off wrote:
Head of ICE - "We will arrest anyone we find in the country illegally, even if they lack a criminal record. We're also cracking down on companies hiring unauthorized workers. Boom. America. We will not waver; we will not tire; we will not falter, and we will not fail.
And 82 year old grandfather permanent residents without criminal records. Need to get rid of them, too, just because.
90 -
Oldrunningguy wrote:
lolz
“Trump's ankles have become so thick and slow he's named them Eric and Don Jr”
He's the most unhealthy president ever seen and just look at the bags under his eyes. He's nothing but a bag of skin like Jabba the Hutt.
51 -
OLear
“When grown men hang out together, it's usually centered around a specific activity: beer, sports, poker, etc.
Well, Trump doesn't drink, so they weren't drinking buddies.
Epstein didn't golf, so they weren't golfing buddies.
This ain't complicated.”91 -
Trump won, libs lost wrote:
No need to hide, Igy. Don't be embarrassed.
41 -
El Runkin wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
Tulsi Gabbard is the Director of National Intelligence, in case you are being misled. What you have read are unclassified documents. The real news is behind closed doors but Obama is oddly silent. He’s being accused of treason chap. and he’s not talking, he’s lawyering up. criminal style layers
No. You said "A sitting President accused of manufacturing evidence to prohibit the opposition candidate from power." I said I'm not seeing that accusation -- "manufacturing evidence" or "prohibiting power" -- anywhere in Gabbard's statement, or anywhere in her weird, undated "Memorandum," or anywhere in any of the documents she released (all of which I believe were released years ago) or in any of the media reporting on this that I've read, including Fox. Again, what are you reading or referring to? I can't find it.
That Gabbard Memo seriously looks like it was cobbled together by a high school student. It's retarded. Go read it and try to figure out what she's actually complaining about.
If Gabbard was a first year journalism major at a state university with open enrollment and no admissions standards other than a HS grad, she would get an F if she turned in this memo. The memo slips back and forth between two very different issues. The Obama era FBI was consistent that it did not believe that the Russians had hacked voting machines or tallying infrastructure in order to change the vote for Trump. Gabbard then takes clips out of context to make it appear as if the Obama administration flipped flopped on this finding and went against internal findings to claim that Russia did hack voting infrastructure. She then calls that "Russiagate".
Gabbard deceptively uses clips talking about "hacking" and election influencing to conflate later findings about Russia hacking Clinton's emails (Russian hackers did do it, but could not be traced back to FSB which is typical Russian plausible deniability), Russian cyber influence campaigns (Russian influence campaigns against Clinton in 2016 are well documented and significant despite claims by pro-Russian "journalists" that they were clumsy and ineffective) and whether Trump colluded with Russia on these fronts with the conclusions on hacking election infrastructure.
So, Gabbard is basically saying that Obama's FBI found there was no hacking election infrastructure but then turned around and claimed that Russia did "hack" and "influence" the election but does not disclose that the quotes about "hacking" and "influence" she references are not about hacking election infrastructure. And Russiagate was never about hacking voting machines. It was a question about whether the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russians over hacking Clinton's emails and Russia's vast internet influence campaign.
112 -
Hunter's crack fueled rant. What a mess.
He wants to invade El Salvador to bring the illegal aliens back. LOLz!!!!!!
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.28 -
El Runkin wrote:
AOCIA wrote:
Of course the US has never done or attempted any of these things in Russia.
I certainly hope we have and continue to do so. But with a Russia-adjacent appeaser in office, I doubt we are doing so today. In fact, I think DOGE shut down all Russian counter-intelligence activity. We have gone nuts.
What's your perspective on why the Russia Ukraine war started?Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. That Russian military assault on Ukraine continues today. Russians have killed tens of thousands of Ukranian civilians and ruined the lives of millions more. Russians occupy many miles of Ukraine territory and tyrannize the Ukrainian locals in occupied land. Russians, including you, are scumbags with a pernicious serf mentality that makes them easily manipulable by Russian management. That latter point has been true for centuries.
That's my perspective in a nutshell. No one here has any interest in your perspective. We know where to find Kremlin sh!t if needed.
You really think that the war began in 2022?
32 -
El Runkin wrote:
Russia is an enemy of the United States of America.
How so?
34
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.