Looks like we just lost a trade battle with Mexico. We need to pay them $163 million in reparations.
Getting tired of all this winning.
Looks like we just lost a trade battle with Mexico. We need to pay them $163 million in reparations.
Getting tired of all this winning.
some more information on how if DC backs down on enviro regulations all is not lost.
Many of the largest US companies have targets to reduce emissions or be more green in some way.
So the states can do it, and companies are apparently doing it too, without DC.
That's a positive.
eric a blair wrote:
some more information on how if DC backs down on enviro regulations all is not lost.
Many of the largest US companies have targets to reduce emissions or be more green in some way.
So the states can do it, and companies are apparently doing it too, without DC.
That's a positive.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/climate/with-government-in-retreat-companies-step-up-on-emissions.html?_r=0
It's positive but pretty sad. If most stick to some kind of plan it probably means they have the wisdom to see past this one off administration. Dismantilling efforts like this to then have to reaction it later is costly too so might as well just keep it going. That and they may fear customer backlash.
You've been traced to a campus in Virginia. Chill out.
Hacker Joe wrote:
You've been traced to a campus in Virginia. Chill out.
You've been traced to a gay bathhouse in SF.
Fck you.
You fagg0t😂
Hacker Joe wrote:
You've been traced to a campus in Virginia. Chill out.
You've been traced to a gay bathhouse in SF.
Fck you.
You fagg0t😂
You do realize you don't have to click twice to post, right? Once click is enough? Two clicks might give two posts....double the fun, I guess.
Seems like a mistake you make regularly. Are you new to the Internet?
Cut him some slack, he majored in Valet Parking.
Hacker Joe wrote:
You've been traced to a campus in Virginia. Chill out.
Damn Virginia? Had always predicted Mississippi or Alabama.
Just a reminder:
* AMERICANS WANT GOP TO MAKE OBAMACARE WORK: A new Kaiser Family Foundation poll finds that Obamacare’s approval rating is in positive territory, 48-41, and 74 percent want the law to work. The public disapproves of Trump’s threat to sabotage it.
DiscoGary wrote:
Read alpha male wrote:Don't know if you have any interest in understanding the truth but on the off chance that you do:
1) There is no evidence to support Trump's "theory" that illegals vote in any numbers at all. Every person with experience in the election process from both sides of the aisle agrees that there is simply no basis in fact for Trump's claim.
2) "Sanctuary cities" are breaking no laws. There is no law requiring local law enforcement to do the job of federal law enforcement on these matters.
3) The primary reason that many cities do not turn over illegals to the feds is that if they were to do so then they would have far less ability to effectively police their cities since a huge part of the population would be far less likely to cooperate with them.
Anyway, just in case you were more interested in reality than Trump is, there you go.
1) There's loads of evidence that illegals vote.
https://www.newsmax.com/TomFitton/aliens-fraud-illegal-voter/2017/01/30/id/771123/2) Hmmm. Interesting. So even though Federal law has supremacy over State law, States don't have to do anything at all to enforce Federal law to the point where enforcement of the law is being actively thwarted. I like this. I'm a Federalist after all, so I better like it! My side can use it.
3) No. the primary reason is because Democrats want a new underclass of people to buy off with goodies. That's obvious to everyone. Everything else is BS.
BTW: Democrats have used the "coercive Federal power" of defunding to abuse their power and control the population many, many times. Most famously in Obama's Trans Bathroom decree where he threatened to pull funding to any educational institution which didn't adhere to his decree. In fact this is the primary mechanism the left uses to beat the population into submission. All of educational institutions are controlled in this way. Suddenly, when our side grabs the weapon and starts to use it, it becomes un-Constitutional! SHAZAYAM! Magic!
Got to love those judges. One thing I can say about you Dems. You don't worry being hypocritical. Completely shameless.
So, in other words, you are not interested in reality. Got it!
You libbbtwats continually butt fck one another and spread AIDS but you want to ban soda pop...
And you want people to think you are interested in "REALITY?"😂😂😂
You stupid fck😂
You libbbtwats continually butt fck one another and spread AIDS but you want to ban soda pop...
And you want people to think you are interested in "REALITY?"😂😂😂
You stupid fck😂
Read Alpha Male wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:1) There's loads of evidence that illegals vote.
https://www.newsmax.com/TomFitton/aliens-fraud-illegal-voter/2017/01/30/id/771123/2) Hmmm. Interesting. So even though Federal law has supremacy over State law, States don't have to do anything at all to enforce Federal law to the point where enforcement of the law is being actively thwarted. I like this. I'm a Federalist after all, so I better like it! My side can use it.
3) No. the primary reason is because Democrats want a new underclass of people to buy off with goodies. That's obvious to everyone. Everything else is BS.
BTW: Democrats have used the "coercive Federal power" of defunding to abuse their power and control the population many, many times. Most famously in Obama's Trans Bathroom decree where he threatened to pull funding to any educational institution which didn't adhere to his decree. In fact this is the primary mechanism the left uses to beat the population into submission. All of educational institutions are controlled in this way. Suddenly, when our side grabs the weapon and starts to use it, it becomes un-Constitutional! SHAZAYAM! Magic!
Got to love those judges. One thing I can say about you Dems. You don't worry being hypocritical. Completely shameless.
So, in other words, you are not interested in reality. Got it!
The reality is that if ANY institution, State, person, or hockey club tried to get away with ignoring a Federal law that the DEMOCRATS wanted enforced... they'd be hammered into submission and no amount of "it's not my job!" bullsh!t would be tolerated.. Spin all you want, but that's the truth.
DiscoGary wrote:
Read Alpha Male wrote:So, in other words, you are not interested in reality. Got it!
The reality is that if ANY institution, State, person, or hockey club tried to get away with ignoring a Federal law that the DEMOCRATS wanted enforced... they'd be hammered into submission and no amount of "it's not my job!" bullsh!t would be tolerated.. Spin all you want, but that's the truth.
give us some examples Gary. You can't just yell into the wind - you have to give some examples.
that said,
I think you may have a point on the trans bathroom issues...I believe the Obama Feds were telling institutions that they have to follow federal guidelines or face the risk of loss of fed funding.
that seems to me a decent example. Is it not, anti-trumpers?
DRINK F*** FIGHT wrote:
You stupid fck😂
Sez the guy who keeps clicking twice and posting twice...
You're an Internet Explorer user, aren't you? I think you would be.
DiscoGary wrote:
I joined the Tea Party movement which re-energized the Republican party and got them back into power ... so they could ignore us, stab us in the back, and call us names ... BIG mistake ... therefore Trump!
Do something productive.
Starting a trade war with TWO of your top-5 trading partners helps you?
His economic and trade policies all encourage economic contraction. How does that help you?
If the ACA repeal bill HAD gone through, it would have stabbed you in the back.
It's not clear to me why you don't see that. That's an honest observation.
I think maybe you are confusing me with other name-callers in this thread.
We should all, D and R and I, be infuriated by this - the Republicans are carving out congress, making members and staff not subject to the new preexisting conditions clause.
meaning if you are an american with preexisting conditions, you will have high rates. unless you are in congress.
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/330592-house-gop-health-bill-changes-exempt-members-of-congress
Shabazz wrote:
DRINK F*** FIGHT wrote:You stupid fck😂
Sez the guy who keeps clicking twice and posting twice...
You're an Internet Explorer user, aren't you? I think you would be.
Is this your idea of a comeback shabitch?
You stupid fck😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Shabazz wrote:
DRINK F*** FIGHT wrote:You stupid fck😂
Sez the guy who keeps clicking twice and posting twice...
You're an Internet Explorer user, aren't you? I think you would be.
Is this your idea of a comeback shabitch?
You stupid fck😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂