Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

agip wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

NOOO! Mueller can issue a report to Congress detailing his crimes. Congress can then impeach and the Senate convict and I will be right, or Trump can resign and I will be right. I have never said Mueller would indict. Most say Mueller will probably NOT indict a sitting president as per DOJ guidelines. I expect this to be true unless what he finds is extremely serious, or unless his conclusion is very near when Trump leaves office...he may then indict after he is out of office.

Again, I have never said Mueller would indict Trump. You are trying to move the goal posts in your favor. Can't do that.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Flagpole you left one option out: NY State could indict and prosecute also. Or any state. And DJT couldn't pardon his way out of that one.

But the larger point is that Trumpists mistakenly argue that the Mueller investigation is all about getting trump. It's not. It's about describing the links between Moscow and the Trump campaign, plus anything else they discover along the way.

Maybe the 82 meetings between Moscow gov't agents and the Trump campaign were completely legit and maybe Trump hasn't been a serial financial criminal and maybe he hasn't obstructed justice.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

foo wrote:

It doesn’t matter what Meuller does. Trump is a self-proclaimed criminal. Do you remember when he said you “have to grab em by the pu**y.” He’s a sexual predator and a criminal.

That’s just one example. There are many others. Why won’t the slimeball release his taxes? What’s he hiding?

If you're going to quote Trump, then do it accurately. He said: "And when you're a star THEY LET YOU DO IT. You can do anything. Grab them by the p*ssy. You can do anything.."

It implies consent from the woman, it's not rape, it's not a crime. If a woman wants a guy to bang her, she's DTF- it's game on. Trump was an alpha male, which women wanted . He dated and slept with models, actresses, and women who wanted to be with him just because of his celebrity- no different from a pro athlete, Hollywood actor or rock star.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

NOOO! Mueller can issue a report to Congress detailing his crimes. Congress can then impeach and the Senate convict and I will be right, or Trump can resign and I will be right. I have never said Mueller would indict. Most say Mueller will probably NOT indict a sitting president as per DOJ guidelines. I expect this to be true unless what he finds is extremely serious, or unless his conclusion is very near when Trump leaves office...he may then indict after he is out of office.

Again, I have never said Mueller would indict Trump. You are trying to move the goal posts in your favor. Can't do that.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Again, a report from Mueller listing Trump crimes for Congress will be slim to none. This leads to your inevitable Flagpolian Flop. The only crimes that rise to impeachment level are possibly obstruction of justice & Russian collusion. And in the event, the worst case scenario for Trump does indeed happen, you will also need a Blue Wave this November to take place- also very slim odds. Anything short of that, means Clownpole forever. You're gonna fail. Mueller has to hit a home run- with significant charges on Trump.

It just keeps heading to:

Clownpole is coming

Mueller isn't

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

foo wrote:

It doesn’t matter what Meuller does. Trump is a self-proclaimed criminal. Do you remember when he said you “have to grab em by the pu**y.” He’s a sexual predator and a criminal.

That’s just one example. There are many others. Why won’t the slimeball release his taxes? What’s he hiding?

If you're going to quote Trump, then do it accurately. He said: "And when you're a star THEY LET YOU DO IT. You can do anything. Grab them by the p*ssy. You can do anything.."

It implies consent from the woman, it's not rape, it's not a crime. If a woman wants a guy to bang her, she's DTF- it's game on. Trump was an alpha male, which women wanted . He dated and slept with models, actresses, and women who wanted to be with him just because of his celebrity- no different from a pro athlete, Hollywood actor or rock star.

Awsi Dooger wrote:

LL needs serious help, fast! wrote:

You're absolutely the most idiotic person in the world to believe that Russia influence voters, moronic would be a compliment.

Never saw an ad once that had any influence on the election.

You're really a bizarre person to believe such a thing, and I mean bizarre! I feel sorry for you if you actually believe that.

**********Simple, show me the ads whether in writing or video that were from Russia, just one ad and if so, show me how it influenced anything.

Again, just one ad from magazine form or video.

I'll wait over here for a few minutes, or a few 100 years, while you go and find it.

Liberals lost and liberals lie, period.

My sister is an elementary school teacher. A few weeks before the election she showed me anti-Hillary Facebook articles that a right wing colleague had been forwarding to everyone. I read those articles and they were so preposterous I couldn't imagine anyone could do anything but laugh at them. Nothing but one absurdity after another.

How wrong I was. Never underestimate the power of conservatives to clutch any lie or batch of a thousand lies, if it suits their tortured line of thought.

That's what Russia accomplished via Facebook and elsewhere. I've read dozens of related articles. The same people tried to maim Hillary in the primaries by sending bogus Facebook articles to Bernie Sanders supporters. But it went nowhere. The liberal readers weren't stupid enough to be fooled. But that issue was easily solved when aimed at conservatives.

There are countless articles on how Russia used social media to alter the election. Beyond laughable to pretend it never happened. Here is one link from the New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/us/politics/russia-facebook-twitter-election.html

agip wrote:

Idiot Tester wrote:

I’m far from an trumper.

The guy was clearly incompetent. You failed.

Go read the report issued a few weeks ago. Not the Fox or CNN interpretation. Read the actual report and report back to me.

Well probably I should read the report but in this world I won't take the time.

For the record, here's the wikipedia entry on the IG report. It says the same thing I said

But sure, reading the actual report would be better,

wikipedia:

he OIG discovered text messages and instant messages between three FBI employees which expressed hostility toward 2016 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and support for his opponent, Hillary Clinton.[3] The report stated that while there was evidence of political leanings found, the bias did not affect any decision the agents made in their professional capacities relative to the email investigation.[4]

James Comey

The report was critical of James Comey. Regarding his July press conference, in which he criticized Clinton even while announcing the investigation was over, the IG said it was "extraordinary and insubordinate for Comey to conceal his intentions (about the press conference) from his superiors", and that "we found none of his reasons to be a persuasive basis for deviating from well-established Department policies."[5] Comey's October decision to send a letter notifying Congress that the investigation had been re-opened one week before the election was described as "ad-hoc" and "a serious error in judgment".[5] Horowitz concluded that prosecutorial decisions in the Clinton case were consistent with precedent and were not affected by bias.[4] Likewise the investigation found no evidence to support claims by Donald Trump and his supporters that the FBI "rigged the case to clear Clinton".[6] The report cites multiple instances of unprofessionalism, bias, and misjudgment, which could have a deleterious effect on the FBI's credibility.[6]

Flagpole wrote:

Awsi Dooger wrote:

My sister is an elementary school teacher. A few weeks before the election she showed me anti-Hillary Facebook articles that a right wing colleague had been forwarding to everyone. I read those articles and they were so preposterous I couldn't imagine anyone could do anything but laugh at them. Nothing but one absurdity after another.

How wrong I was. Never underestimate the power of conservatives to clutch any lie or batch of a thousand lies, if it suits their tortured line of thought.

That's what Russia accomplished via Facebook and elsewhere. I've read dozens of related articles. The same people tried to maim Hillary in the primaries by sending bogus Facebook articles to Bernie Sanders supporters. But it went nowhere. The liberal readers weren't stupid enough to be fooled. But that issue was easily solved when aimed at conservatives.

There are countless articles on how Russia used social media to alter the election. Beyond laughable to pretend it never happened. Here is one link from the New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/us/politics/russia-facebook-twitter-election.html

CORRECT! I know some people who said they were going to vote for Trump because they believed some crap they saw online about Hillary. I tried my best initially in the election cycle to swat away the lies out there, but there were too many

Flagpole wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

If you're going to quote Trump, then do it accurately. He said: "And when you're a star THEY LET YOU DO IT. You can do anything. Grab them by the p*ssy. You can do anything.."

It implies consent from the woman, it's not rape, it's not a crime. If a woman wants a guy to bang her, she's DTF- it's game on. Trump was an alpha male, which women wanted . He dated and slept with models, actresses, and women who wanted to be with him just because of his celebrity- no different from a pro athlete, Hollywood actor or rock star.

He also said, "I don't even wait...just kiss".

Also, at least 19 different women have said he forced himself on them uninvited and unagreed to. Sexual predator.

So, let's be clear about what we're dealing with here. He didn't say to these women, "Excuse me madam, but might I have the pleasure of grabbing you by the pvssy?"

Sexual predator.

agip wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

NOOO! Mueller can issue a report to Congress detailing his crimes. Congress can then impeach and the Senate convict and I will be right, or Trump can resign and I will be right. I have never said Mueller would indict. Most say Mueller will probably NOT indict a sitting president as per DOJ guidelines. I expect this to be true unless what he finds is extremely serious, or unless his conclusion is very near when Trump leaves office...he may then indict after he is out of office.

Again, I have never said Mueller would indict Trump. You are trying to move the goal posts in your favor. Can't do that.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Flagpole you left one option out: NY State could indict and prosecute also. Or any state. And DJT couldn't pardon his way out of that one.

But the larger point is that Trumpists mistakenly argue that the Mueller investigation is all about getting trump. It's not. It's about describing the links between Moscow and the Trump campaign, plus anything else they discover along the way.

Maybe the 82 meetings between Moscow gov't agents and the Trump campaign were completely legit and maybe Trump hasn't been a serial financial criminal and maybe he hasn't obstructed justice.

Awsi Dooger wrote:

LL needs serious help, fast! wrote:

You're absolutely the most idiotic person in the world to believe that Russia influence voters, moronic would be a compliment.

Never saw an ad once that had any influence on the election.

You're really a bizarre person to believe such a thing, and I mean bizarre! I feel sorry for you if you actually believe that.

**********Simple, show me the ads whether in writing or video that were from Russia, just one ad and if so, show me how it influenced anything.

Again, just one ad from magazine form or video.

I'll wait over here for a few minutes, or a few 100 years, while you go and find it.

Liberals lost and liberals lie, period.

My sister is an elementary school teacher. A few weeks before the election she showed me anti-Hillary Facebook articles that a right wing colleague had been forwarding to everyone. I read those articles and they were so preposterous I couldn't imagine anyone could do anything but laugh at them. Nothing but one absurdity after another.

How wrong I was. Never underestimate the power of conservatives to clutch any lie or batch of a thousand lies, if it suits their tortured line of thought.

That's what Russia accomplished via Facebook and elsewhere. I've read dozens of related articles. The same people tried to maim Hillary in the primaries by sending bogus Facebook articles to Bernie Sanders supporters. But it went nowhere. The liberal readers weren't stupid enough to be fooled. But that issue was easily solved when aimed at conservatives.

There are countless articles on how Russia used social media to alter the election. Beyond laughable to pretend it never happened. Here is one link from the New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/us/politics/russia-facebook-twitter-election.html