Flagpole is right as usual wrote:
Here's some of the ways this would directly be a crime for Donald Trump - collected, demonstrated, and explained with original sources only:
Under 18 USC 1001 - Trump made a materially false document in order to cover up a matter of investigation in the Trump Tower response memo which his lawyers accidentally revealed to the NYS was dictated by Trump.
Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully— (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
2. It also makes him an accessory to the Trump Tower meeting crime directly admitted to by Don Jr. and Kushner both of whom tweeted their own emails from the campaign. These emails were corroborated by Don Trump Jr. in a separate tweet. Both men have stated publicly that these tweets were real and from them. — In these tweeted images, Jr. states his intention and frame of mind plainly in the first image as, "The information they suggested they had about Hillary Clinton I thought was political opposition research... I decided to take the meeting" We now know that Kushner and Don Jr. believed the meeting to be about a thing of value, political opposition research. And made an attempt to meet.
Which violates 52 USC 30121
(a) Prohibition It shall be unlawful for— (2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national
In other words...a crime was 100% committed by President Trump if this is all true.
Why are these these Mueller "armchair lawyers" so convinced that they have this case won and then post legal section symbols that they simply copy & paste from some article to appear as "experts" on this case? A word to the wise, stop doing that. It makes you look foolish.