I checked out on this many minutes ago. I don't go through life hurling insults and name-calling people who I disagree with. I enjoy engaging in discourse with even those I disagree with. I try to respect where they are coming from. When you start calling others "idiots" then I quit engaging with the person. Go through your life calling others idiots but you are cheapened by that. Enjoy life. BE complimentary.
I have no respect for people that's only goal is to obfuscate on half of a convicted criminal. You've earned every insult thrown your way. Your act is offensive. No need to be complimentary to you.
Insults is how you go through life? Sad. Please don't respond to me any more. You are a downer.
I have no respect for people that's only goal is to obfuscate on half of a convicted criminal. You've earned every insult thrown your way. Your act is offensive. No need to be complimentary to you.
Insults is how you go through life? Sad. Please don't respond to me any more. You are a downer.
I checked out on this many minutes ago. I don't go through life hurling insults and name-calling people who I disagree with. I enjoy engaging in discourse with even those I disagree with. I try to respect where they are coming from. When you start calling others "idiots" then I quit engaging with the person. Go through your life calling others idiots but you are cheapened by that. Enjoy life. BE complimentary.
Can I assume that your question about why he kept citing New York law has been sufficiently answered by the fact that it is a New York State case?
The 34 counts of "falsifying business records" by labeling payments to a lawyer as "legal expenses" can only be elevated to felonies if the records were "falsified" in furtherance of another crime.
What was the other crime? Was it a federal crime" Do you have any idea?
This post was edited 6 minutes after it was posted.
I have no respect for people that's only goal is to obfuscate on half of a convicted criminal. You've earned every insult thrown your way. Your act is offensive. No need to be complimentary to you.
Insults is how you go through life? Sad. Please don't respond to me any more. You are a downer.
Every point you make is an insult. I'll continue to respond accordingly.
Can I assume that your question about why he kept citing New York law has been sufficiently answered by the fact that it is a New York State case?
The 34 counts of "falsifying business records" by labeling payments to a lawyer as "legal expenses" can only be elevated to felonies of the records were "falsified" in furtherance of another crime.
What was the other crime? Was it a federal crime" Do you have any idea?
See Boris, you do understand the felonies that Trump committed.
You laid it out perfectly. No more playing dumb for you.
No need to define the other crime. He was convicted of this crime.
Can I assume that your question about why he kept citing New York law has been sufficiently answered by the fact that it is a New York State case?
The 34 counts of "falsifying business records" by labeling payments to a lawyer as "legal expenses" can only be elevated to felonies of the records were "falsified" in furtherance of another crime.
What was the other crime? Was it a federal crime" Do you have any idea?
I still don't understand how you think you look slick by pretending to be ignorant regarding a question that literally ever reader of your post, including you, knows the answer to. It's confounding.
Can someone help me out on what his schtick or strategy is here? What am I missing? I can't see any idiotic gotcha in this, or even an idiotic setup for an idiotic gotcha. Is he really this deluded and lame?
The 34 counts of "falsifying business records" by labeling payments to a lawyer as "legal expenses" can only be elevated to felonies of the records were "falsified" in furtherance of another crime.
What was the other crime? Was it a federal crime" Do you have any idea?
See Boris, you do understand the felonies that Trump committed.
You laid it out perfectly. No more playing dumb for you.
No need to define the other crime. He was convicted of this crime.
You have so much Ukrainian spunk in your eyes you can't see reality.
The business records are a minor misdemeanor unless there's another crime.
Not one of you leftist idiots has any idea what the case was even about. Much like the judge in the case you don't care about the law you just care about rigging the 2024 election and getting the scary orange man.
Can I assume that your question about why he kept citing New York law has been sufficiently answered by the fact that it is a New York State case?
The 34 counts of "falsifying business records" by labeling payments to a lawyer as "legal expenses" can only be elevated to felonies if the records were "falsified" in furtherance of another crime.
What was the other crime? Was it a federal crime" Do you have any idea?
Further proof that A-Dolt is a troll. He has had this explained dozens of times but he keeps asking it.
As far as being a Russian troll, I'm not sure. But he does spend lots of time pumping Putin's talking points on the Russia war thread.
The 34 counts of "falsifying business records" by labeling payments to a lawyer as "legal expenses" can only be elevated to felonies of the records were "falsified" in furtherance of another crime.
What was the other crime? Was it a federal crime" Do you have any idea?
I still don't understand how you think you look slick by pretending to be ignorant regarding a question that literally ever reader of your post, including you, knows the answer to. It's confounding.
Can someone help me out on what his schtick or strategy is here? What am I missing? I can't see any idiotic gotcha in this, or even an idiotic setup for an idiotic gotcha. Is he really this deluded and lame?
It's confounding that you all claim to know the answer yet somehow not one of you can name the crime.
With the Walz pick, Harris will pick up ground over the next few days.
With the DNC in two weeks, she will pick up even more ground.
Check back in 3 weeks and see where things stand. If she is up by 2 right now, she'll be up by a lot more then.
And then, if Trump has the nerve to show up and debate on 9/10, she'll be up by even more after that date.
Add to that the fact that don-OLD DUMP faces a sentencing hearing.
Can't think that's going to help him much.
OMG?!! You are actually banking on the courts to stop Trump? HA!!!! Good luck with that, wow. You are in for a rude awakening.
Really, this is a Harris thread. We need to focus on her and how young girls can use her blueprint for success. She is a true role model. Young girls who want to have power can work hard, like AOC, and knock on doors and preach from the park...or they can hike up their skirts, toss their souls to the devil, and target much older horny married men. Have him give you powerful jobs with great wages and gifts in exchange for "love".
I love how you have to use the word "adjudicated" (a word you probably just learned) because you know you can't use the word "convicted" - you know, a word that would imply Trump was actually proven to have committed sexual assault.
You know you are losing when your political argument is that he was only a "adjudicated" rapist and not a convicted one.
I'd say that you're losing LEGAL and MORAL arguments when you're doing that, as well !!
The 34 counts of "falsifying business records" by labeling payments to a lawyer as "legal expenses" can only be elevated to felonies if the records were "falsified" in furtherance of another crime.
What was the other crime? Was it a federal crime" Do you have any idea?
Further proof that A-Dolt is a troll. He has had this explained dozens of times but he keeps asking it.
As far as being a Russian troll, I'm not sure. But he does spend lots of time pumping Putin's talking points on the Russia war thread.
What was the crime?
How's that Ukraine war you've all completely lost interest in going for Ukraine?
You provoked a war demanded Ukraine fight, promised to support them, and then you completely abandoned them. You're a real hero.
I still don't understand how you think you look slick by pretending to be ignorant regarding a question that literally ever reader of your post, including you, knows the answer to. It's confounding.
Can someone help me out on what his schtick or strategy is here? What am I missing? I can't see any idiotic gotcha in this, or even an idiotic setup for an idiotic gotcha. Is he really this deluded and lame?
It's confounding that you all claim to know the answer yet somehow not one of you can name the crime.
Trump isn't worth it dude. Pick a better human being to spend every waking hour defending and making excuses for. He laughs that he has people so dumb to buy his BS every single day. And we do too.
It's confounding that you all claim to know the answer yet somehow not one of you can name the crime.
Trump isn't worth it dude. Pick a better human being to spend every waking hour defending and making excuses for. He laughs that he has people so dumb to buy his BS every single day. And we do too.
Walz is a veteran, a teacher, a football coach, a great communicator, gets elected in red areas, lived overseas, a successful and popular governor and young. And he's been married to the same person and a dad.
I suppose the calculus was that Walz knows how to reach across the aisle and appeal to people in WI, PA, WI. While Shapiro reads as a big city easterner so might not do as well in MI and WI.
And really...shapiro is too aggressive and ambitious to be veep.
only bad thing is that while walz is only 59, he looks like he's 70. Won't give the appearance of a new generation taking over, even though he is.
here...we....go
I hadn't seen many pictures of him (and no, didn't really know squat about him). First photo I saw was totally in line with your comment about looking 70. Quite surprised to see his actual age.
My initial thought: God knows exactly why Harris picked him, BUT IF it was to appeal to the very low information voter who will feel better about voting for the black female because she comes packaged with an older, gray, family guy looking white guy, she nailed it !!!
See Boris, you do understand the felonies that Trump committed.
You laid it out perfectly. No more playing dumb for you.
No need to define the other crime. He was convicted of this crime.
You have so much Ukrainian spunk in your eyes you can't see reality.
The business records are a minor misdemeanor unless there's another crime.
Not one of you leftist idiots has any idea what the case was even about. Much like the judge in the case you don't care about the law you just care about rigging the 2024 election and getting the scary orange man.
You explained it perfectly. You fully understand all 34 of Trump's felonies. There's nothing more to explain.
The jury was presented with enough evidence to convict given the criteria you listed above.
You have so much Ukrainian spunk in your eyes you can't see reality.
The business records are a minor misdemeanor unless there's another crime.
Not one of you leftist idiots has any idea what the case was even about. Much like the judge in the case you don't care about the law you just care about rigging the 2024 election and getting the scary orange man.
You explained it perfectly. You fully understand all 34 of Trump's felonies. There's nothing more to explain.
The jury was presented with enough evidence to convict given the criteria you listed above.
I understand it perfectly. It's a sham and a gross abuse of the legal system for political gain.
The problem is 99% of you lefties don't understand and the 1% that do don't care because they're corrupt and evil.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.