Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Ridiculous fake stats totally made up. Well done democrats!

rupcucj wrote:

rupcucj wrote:

making sure no one forgets how dumb right wingers are

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=29&v=5Q1cfjh6VfE

making sure no one forgets how dumb left wingers are

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzbHb7JissIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34ORCA0pCbYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1j6iF7POoc

One link by a left winger, Democrats rejoice.

4 by a right winger, Democrats yell "foul".

Glad Trump kicked Hillary's butt to the curb and can't wait for 2020 to see what the liberals offer? Hillary got a little too cocky and was ready to move in...but wait, I lost????

Nutpole should run, or LL Lunatic, you guys might have a chance!!!!

1) I NEVER said there weren't WMDs in Iraq, and in fact, I was all for Bush going in there to get Saddam...not based on potential WMDs though but because he kept thumbing his nose at UN Sanctions. Why would a Democrat feel that way? Because I am and always have been a Rule of Law person. THAT is why I am against Trump because he is threatening the Rule of Law.

2) I notice how you sidestep the siding with a murderous dictator part other than deflection that I just refuted. No answer for that eh?

3) Money laundering will be proven. You are a fool to think otherwise.

4) Obstruction of justice will be proven. You are a fool to think otherwise.

5) Trump is a serial liar. No other President was a serial liar. False equivalency to mention that all of them lie.

6) What we know already shows conspiracy to help Trump win the election. This will be a proven fact, and we will eventually know more than we do now.

7) Hillary again? Let it go man. She is old news. She has nothing to do with how horrible Trump is, and as of the Helsinki meeting, we know for sure that he is a traitor rather than just assuming so. Again, false equivalency. Trump is so far and away worse than any other national US politician that there just is no comparison.

In addition to him being a Grade A A$$hole, Trump will be found guilty of (though some may drop off due to plea bargain):

Obstruction of Justice

Money Laundering

Bank fraud or conspiracy to commit

Wire fraud or conspiracy to commit

Campaign Finance violation

Conspiracy with Russia and maybe even other countries against the United States of America

Logan Act violation (if they are even interested)

Emoluments Clause violation (if they are even interested)

Some sort of hacking law violation or conspiracy to commit

Some sort of RICO thing if not already covered in another charge

Wiretap Act violation

Uniform Trade Secrets Act violation

Conspiracy to commit trespass to chattels

Some sort of computer crimes act violation

Likely some other things too

He's a traitor.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

https://i.imgur.com/RAfUf6i.png

Rigged for Hillary wrote: The issue has always been spending and both parties are guilty. Try again, poop boy.

RINO alert!!! Republicans love big government and want the children of the middle class and poor to pay for it. You guys love to pretend you aren't dirty free loading big government grifters like liberals, yet here you are promoting something for nothing, free spending radically liberal fiscal policy.

If I'm to join your crazy cult, I'm supposed to argue against big government and here you are posting "Everyone does it." as an excuse to violate a supposed tenet of Conservative American ideals.

Keep up the personal attacks. They make you so smart!

It's not even party over country any more. It's open borders for America's enemies.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/19/gop-spending-package-democrats-election-security-698233

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/19/trump-russia-putin-interpreter-subpoena-732359

The Dear Leader losing all the time must be bigly tiring. He needs to work even less, three days. More golf! More charging the government Trump property expenses! That will help.

Picador wrote:

Putin to visit in the fall

Let me be the first to predict that this never happens. Another stupid scenario that they will be forced to postpone until sping 2019 (if ever).

They are not going to host a Russian president while trying to defend against a cyber attack against the Nov'18 elections.

What defending?? There is no meaningful effort to secure voting. An administration that refuses to do anything about the issue.The House's budget has zero money for election security for 2020.

A vote for the Right is a vote for Putin.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

A vote for the Right is a vote for Putin.

Yep. It was in 2016 also as will be clearly laid out for the American public.

Flagpole wrote:1) I NEVER said there weren't WMDs in Iraq, and in fact, I was all for Bush going in there to get Saddam...

Flagpole, there WERE no WMDs in Iraq. I did my best to warn everyone on here, way back then, that it all looked made up, and then it turned out to be the case. Colin Powel showed the UN security council the stack of bull$hit he'd been fed by Cheney and cronies, and the whole world (evidently other than you, shame on you) knows now it was all fictitious. The rewritten history records the invasion of Iraq and subsequent capture and execution of Saddam Hussein as well justified by other hindsight arguments, but nobody with an ounce of intelligence (which I presumed you had) still accepts the WMD basis for invading Saddam's Iraq.

Your wonderful Ann Coulter

http://www.anncoulter.com/

Just for accuracy....

There were no WMDs in Iraq....not in the way we were led to be. There was no current program.

What was found, what some insurgents tried to use were old pre-1991 rounds that either: 1. “Buried in the desert” Rounds were scattered and hidden before 1991 and even Iraqi officials didn’t know where they were. And 2. “Rounds we already knew were there”. There was a specific chemical weapon facility that UN inspectors knew about and simply kept tabs on. They weren’t able to make new chemicals or rounds.

So again, there was no WMD in Iraq, not really.

Alan

old timey poster wrote:

Flagpole wrote:1) I NEVER said there weren't WMDs in Iraq, and in fact, I was all for Bush going in there to get Saddam...

Flagpole, there WERE no WMDs in Iraq. I did my best to warn everyone on here, way back then, that it all looked made up, and then it turned out to be the case. Colin Powel showed the UN security council the stack of bull$hit he'd been fed by Cheney and cronies, and the whole world (evidently other than you, shame on you) knows now it was all fictitious. The rewritten history records the invasion of Iraq and subsequent capture and execution of Saddam Hussein as well justified by other hindsight arguments, but nobody with an ounce of intelligence (which I presumed you had) still accepts the WMD basis for invading Saddam's Iraq.

History books will probably show that we invaded because Saddam wouldn't let UN inspectors do their job. He didn't really think we were serious about invading. I feel bad for Colin Powell. He's radioactive.

Alan

halfifornia wrote:

Trollyboy wrote:

Trollminator is rarely honest about reality, it's just the way he plays these boards. Liberal love to do that, makes them feel smart:)!

And you are so pathetic that you reply to your own posts in hopes of validating them and getting a reaction. Ask your mommy to get you some help son.

I am so pathetic since I am a registered user but use a fake handle when I have nothing of substance to say. Yes, you were right, agip did post that, but I'm more concerned with my mommy letting me get out of the basement today.

rupcucj wrote:

rupcucj wrote:

making sure no one forgets how dumb left wingers are

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzbHb7JissIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34ORCA0pCbYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1j6iF7POoc

One link by a left winger, Democrats rejoice.

4 by a right winger, Democrats yell "foul".

Glad Trump kicked Hillary's butt to the curb and can't wait for 2020 to see what the liberals offer? Hillary got a little too cocky and was ready to move in...but wait, I lost????

Nutpole should run, or LL Lunatic, you guys might have a chance!!!!

excellent examples! but the left wingers say "look over there"!

Yes there were Alan, just not the amount that we were led to believe. You can't be that naive, can you?

How long until we see this line of “thinking” on LRC? wrote:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/07/trump-voters-putin-russia/565592/

Have we seen this argument from the Russian bots, FSB/GRU sponsored trolls, or Disco Gary on LRC yet? If not, should be soon....

Gary has already made a version of that argument. Lately, he has been arguing that meddling in our election is OK because everybody does it and it's not that big of a deal.*

This is not far from the treasonous argument that Russia should be allowed to support M.A.G.A. candidates as a matter of course.

*(Of course, it's a VERY big deal because it not only threatens our democracy, it makes office holders beholden to a foreign power)

How long until we see this line of “thinking” on LRC? wrote:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/07/trump-voters-putin-russia/565592/

Have we seen this argument from the Russian bots, FSB/GRU sponsored trolls, or Disco Gary on LRC yet? If not, should be soon....

I don’t see any problem here. Russia is a great country run by a great man—Vladimir Putin. We’d be lucky to have a leader like Putin. If it would’ve been Hillary versus Putin in the 2016 election, Putin would’ve won easily because we have so many thoughtful, patriotic folks on the right that put country over party.

Rigged for HiIlary wrote:

How long until we see this line of “thinking” on LRC? wrote:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/07/trump-voters-putin-russia/565592/

Have we seen this argument from the Russian bots, FSB/GRU sponsored trolls, or Disco Gary on LRC yet? If not, should be soon....

I don’t see any problem here. Russia is a great country run by a great man—Vladimir Putin. We’d be lucky to have a leader like Putin. If it would’ve been Hillary versus Putin in the 2016 election, Putin would’ve won easily because we have so many thoughtful, patriotic folks on the right that put country over party.

Oh my! Well, that is definitely one way of looking at it. The somewhat bizarre thing is that I am fairly confident that if Mr. Trump was on LRC he would give you a +1 or a ^This. Strange times we are livin’ in folks.

Flagpole wrote:

1) I NEVER said there weren't WMDs in Iraq.

What? Flagpole was wrong. I thought he was NEVER wrong.