This is a reminder that Americans vote in 90 days and trump hasn't been able to slow Harris down. The next 20-30 days will be all about Walz - he's gonna haul in wins all over the midwest. Then it's just 2 months out. Time is almost up. Trump has lost command of the headlines and he can't recover.. and JV Dunce is a straight up creep. It's over.
-
21
-
Libs are so excited for their cities to look like this. Oh yeah, that happened under Tim Walz's watch. I guess to them a burned-down hellhole isn't much of a stepdown from their normal poop-infested homeless encampments they're used to.32
-
Cowboy Corky wrote:
cloudy wrote:
He quit drinking in 1995.
Your hero was hanging out with a known pedo in 2007. That's right 12 years after Walz's last drink. Donald Trump was best friends with a real life pedo.
Based on their recent history your guy is an effing creep. And you are an effing creep for supporting him.
How many alcoholics go 30 years without a drink? Very few. I am pretty sure he is still drinking and driving.
So now you're basing your argument on unfounded speculation?
That's all you have, speculation. You can place all your speculation in one hand and you can sh*t in your other hand.
21 -
Trollminator wrote:
This is a reminder that Americans vote in 90 days and trump hasn't been able to slow Harris down. The next 20-30 days will be all about Walz - he's gonna haul in wins all over the midwest. Then it's just 2 months out. Time is almost up. Trump has lost command of the headlines and he can't recover.. and JV Dunce is a straight up creep. It's over.
No one will care about Walz in a week. The next 90 days will be all about Harris.
21 -
cloudy wrote:
Let it Rupp wrote:
Yeah I know, that was the point, criminal guilt is not proven in civil court. Trump is NOT guilty of committing sexual assault, no matter how much you want that to be true.
A finding of guilt isn't necessary to prove something happened. Alec Baldwin shot and killed someone. He was never found guilty. Did it not happen?
The problem you have, is you're stupid.
So you believe that Trump raped someone but can't prove it. Just like how he committed insurrection, and colluded with the Russians. Got it.
03 -
Let it Rupp wrote:
Libs are so excited for their cities to look like this. Oh yeah, that happened under Tim Walz's watch. I guess to them a burned-down hellhole isn't much of a stepdown from their normal poop-infested homeless encampments they're used to.repubs instinctively go for the race and gender attacks. that's where they went first against Kamala and it's where they'll go first against Walz.
it's a sickness. they hate this country.
22 -
cloudy wrote:
Cowboy Corky wrote:
How many alcoholics go 30 years without a drink? Very few. I am pretty sure he is still drinking and driving.
So now you're basing your argument on unfounded speculation?
That's all you have, speculation. You can place all your speculation in one hand and you can sh*t in your other hand.m
All I am saying is that, on average, one who gets a DUI has driven drunk about 200 times previously. And very few Alcoholics maintain their sobriety for 30 years. Those are the facts. Not speculation.
13 -
Cowboy Corky wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
The next 90 days will be all about Harris.
And that is very, very bad for don-OLD Dump and JV Dunce, who have been plummeting in the polls against her.
30 -
Let it Rupp wrote:
So you believe that Trump raped someone but can't prove it. Just like how he committed insurrection, and colluded with the Russians. Got it.
From the official Court Document. Katie Johnson was 12 years old. (June - Sept 1994)
On the third occasion involving the Defendant, Donald J. Trump, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson was forced to engage in an unnatural lesbian sex act with her fellow minor and sex slave, Maria Doe age 12, for the sexual enjoyment of Defendant Trump. After this sex act, both minors were forced to orally copulate Defendant Trump by placing their mouths simultaneously on his erect penis until he achieved sexual orgasm. After zipping up his pants, Defendant Trump physically pushed both
minors away while angrily berating them for the "poor" quality of their sexual performance. 12. On the fourth and final sexual encounter with the Defendant, Donald J. Trump, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, was tied to a bed by Defendant Trump who then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff Johnson. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff Johnson loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to "please wear a condom". Defendant Trump responded by violently striking Plaintiff Johnson in the face with his open hand and screaming that "he would do whatever he
wanted" as he refused to wear protection. After achieving sexual orgasm, the Defendant, Donald J. Trump put his suit back on and when the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, in tears asked Defendant Trump what would happen if he had impregnated her, Defendant Trump grabbed his wallet and threw some money at her and screamed that she should use the money "to get a fuqking abortion".00 -
Let it Rupp wrote:
cloudy wrote:
So you believe that Trump raped someone but can't prove it.
don-OLD Dump had his day in court and was found liable.
He IS an adjudicated sexual abuser. That is a fact.
You can post all day and night on here about whether anyone can "prove it" but it has already been determined in court.
Combine that with the Dobbs decision and don-OLD is toast with women voters.
11 -
Let it Rupp wrote:
cloudy wrote:
A finding of guilt isn't necessary to prove something happened. Alec Baldwin shot and killed someone. He was never found guilty. Did it not happen?
The problem you have, is you're stupid.
So you believe that Trump raped someone but can't prove it. Just like how he committed insurrection, and colluded with the Russians. Got it.
This is where you are in your life. Running interference for a convicted criminal that is friends with no fewer that 4 known pedophiles. You are trying to justify supporting a sexual predator through semantics.
You realize this makes you an awful person.
20 -
Trollminator wrote:
This is a reminder that Americans vote in 90 days and trump hasn't been able to slow Harris down. The next 20-30 days will be all about Walz - he's gonna haul in wins all over the midwest. Then it's just 2 months out. Time is almost up. Trump has lost command of the headlines and he can't recover.. and JV Dunce is a straight up creep. It's over.
I hope you're right. It's encouraging that Trump has been pushed on to the back foot, and has lost all momentum, since Biden dropped out. And I do think that the next 10 days to 2 weeks will be dominated by Harris/Walz.
But 90 days is still a long time, and a lot can change. Think about all of the twists and turns in the last 90 days. Trump's conviction, the assassination attempt, and then Biden dropping out and Harris becoming the (presumptive) nominee. Who knows what's going to happen between now and Election Day.
00 -
Trollminator wrote:
This is a reminder that Americans vote in 90 days and trump hasn't been able to slow Harris down. The next 20-30 days will be all about Walz - he's gonna haul in wins all over the midwest. Then it's just 2 months out. Time is almost up. Trump has lost command of the headlines and he can't recover.. and JV Dunce is a straight up creep. It's over.
Dont forget the bump from the DNC.
The Dems are going to be rolling out an A list of celebs and musicians. Barrack Obama and Joe Biden.
And the American people will have to compare that to Kid Rock, Hulk Hogan and Chachi from the Happy days. And think about the fact that almost none of Trump's former staff think he is fit for office. Including his VP.
00 -
So Archie Bunker is going to be running as VP, but on the democratic ticket?!!!!
This is going to be very confusing for MAAGAs I tell you, very confusing.
00 -
cloudy wrote:
Let it Rupp wrote:
So you believe that Trump raped someone but can't prove it. Just like how he committed insurrection, and colluded with the Russians. Got it.
This is where you are in your life. Running interference for a convicted criminal that is friends with no fewer that 4 known pedophiles. You are trying to justify supporting a sexual predator through semantics.
You realize this makes you an awful person.
Not a convicted criminal. Do you need the law explained to you? This is getting old.
02 -
Cowboy Corky wrote:
cloudy wrote:
So now you're basing your argument on unfounded speculation?
That's all you have, speculation. You can place all your speculation in one hand and you can sh*t in your other hand.m
All I am saying is that, on average, one who gets a DUI has driven drunk about 200 times previously. And very few Alcoholics maintain their sobriety for 30 years. Those are the facts. Not speculation.
Your exact statement - "How many alcoholics go 30 years without a drink? Very few. I am pretty sure he is still drinking and driving."
That is pure speculation.
Like I said, you sound like a jagoff. No to be taken seriously
10 -
Cowboy Corky wrote:
cloudy wrote:
So now you're basing your argument on unfounded speculation?
That's all you have, speculation. You can place all your speculation in one hand and you can sh*t in your other hand.m
All I am saying is that, on average, one who gets a DUI has driven drunk about 200 times previously. And very few Alcoholics maintain their sobriety for 30 years. Those are the facts. Not speculation.
Stop with the "on average" bullsh*t. You made that up. Just like you made up your claim that very few alcoholics maintain their sobriety for 30 years.
And really, who cares? If you're going to vote for the guy with 34 felony convictions (yes, he was convicted of 34 felonies) because the VP pick for the other side has a DUI from 30 years ago, there's no saving you.
10 -
cloudy wrote:
Cowboy Corky wrote:
All I am saying is that, on average, one who gets a DUI has driven drunk about 200 times previously. And very few Alcoholics maintain their sobriety for 30 years. Those are the facts. Not speculation.
Your exact statement - "How many alcoholics go 30 years without a drink? Very few. I am pretty sure he is still drinking and driving."
That is pure speculation.
Like I said, you sound like a jagoff. No to be taken seriously
I go by the law of averages.
01 -
Cowboy Corky wrote:
cloudy wrote:
This is where you are in your life. Running interference for a convicted criminal that is friends with no fewer that 4 known pedophiles. You are trying to justify supporting a sexual predator through semantics.
You realize this makes you an awful person.
Not a convicted criminal. Do you need the law explained to you? This is getting old.
Semantics - That's to soothe yourself.
Everyone else knows what he is.
10 -
Worlds Apart wrote:
Cowboy Corky wrote:
All I am saying is that, on average, one who gets a DUI has driven drunk about 200 times previously. And very few Alcoholics maintain their sobriety for 30 years. Those are the facts. Not speculation.
Stop with the "on average" bullsh*t. You made that up. Just like you made up your claim that very few alcoholics maintain their sobriety for 30 years.
And really, who cares? If you're going to vote for the guy with 34 felony convictions (yes, he was convicted of 34 felonies) because the VP pick for the other side has a DUI from 30 years ago, there's no saving you.
No convictions just yet.
11
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.