Ah yes! My spelling error (which again, I admit, was quite terrible), will continue to be a knock against my opinions / lack of intelligence, etc etc. In fact, if I read between your (very many!) lines, I'm psychopathic too!
You said a whole lotta stuff about "evidence" and "logic". What's on the NY Post front page today?
Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute to this thread?
At least JAHJ stays on topic and tries to make arguments.
Ah yes! My spelling error (which again, I admit, was quite terrible), will continue to be a knock against my opinions / lack of intelligence, etc etc. In fact, if I read between your (very many!) lines, I'm psychopathic too!
You said a whole lotta stuff about "evidence" and "logic". What's on the NY Post front page today?
Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute to this thread?
At least JAHJ stays on topic and tries to make arguments.
Hmm. Were you around early in this thread?
I'm tired of arguing with people who say "Men are not women" etc etc.
I can't remember if it was earlier in this thread or another one that Navratilova came up. Her "evolution" makes me ill. Clearly she has been in Florida too long. Her reaction to the whole bathroom thing? "Trans people can use the disabled one."
Edit: Wait, why did you bring up JAHJ? There's someone that I've actually agreed with.
Edit again: And now I'm going to look at YOUR "contributions" to this thread.
This post was edited 8 minutes after it was posted.
Ah yes! My spelling error (which again, I admit, was quite terrible), will continue to be a knock against my opinions / lack of intelligence, etc etc. In fact, if I read between your (very many!) lines, I'm psychopathic too!
You said a whole lotta stuff about "evidence" and "logic". What's on the NY Post front page today?
Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute to this thread?
At least JAHJ stays on topic and tries to make arguments.
So, I got past page 5 and couldn't find you.
Have you actually posted in this thread before posting about my posting in this thread?
Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute to this thread?
At least JAHJ stays on topic and tries to make arguments.
So, I got past page 5 and couldn't find you.
Have you actually posted in this thread before posting about my posting in this thread?
Chirp....chirp.....the sound of crickets....
Fact: This was Hardloper's first post in this thread!!! 😂
Do tell us, Hardloper, what your learned opinion is about all of this. Clearly you must have something "worthwhile" to say about Nikki's post, the subject of Trans Women in Boston, etc, etc.
I eagerly await your "contribution" to this thread.
Early in this thread I stated my love for Nikki and their opinion. I have also stated that Trans Women Are Women. I have been clear. I have set new downvote PRs which I wear as a badge of honour.
Them have many opinions when them should focus on running so them can beat they before they catches up and beats them which would make them sad and they happy.
Them have many opinions when them should focus on running so them can beat they before they catches up and beats them which would make them sad and they happy.
Have you actually posted in this thread before posting about my posting in this thread?
Chirp....chirp.....the sound of crickets....
Fact: This was Hardloper's first post in this thread!!! 😂
Do tell us, Hardloper, what your learned opinion is about all of this. Clearly you must have something "worthwhile" to say about Nikki's post, the subject of Trans Women in Boston, etc, etc.
I eagerly await your "contribution" to this thread.
Early in this thread I stated my love for Nikki and their opinion. I have also stated that Trans Women Are Women. I have been clear. I have set new downvote PRs which I wear as a badge of honour.
Fact: This was Hardloper's first post in this thread!!! 😂
Do tell us, Hardloper, what your learned opinion is about all of this. Clearly you must have something "worthwhile" to say about Nikki's post, the subject of Trans Women in Boston, etc, etc.
I eagerly await your "contribution" to this thread.
Early in this thread I stated my love for Nikki and their opinion. I have also stated that Trans Women Are Women. I have been clear. I have set new downvote PRs which I wear as a badge of honour.
What Sayest Thou?
Retard
Is that you Hardloper? C'mon Dude, you can do much better than that. State your opinion!! What is YOUR contribution to this thread?
I would refer you and others to Doriane Coleman Lambelet's excellent, clearly-articulated, and compassionate elaboration of this position in her book, , and here:
I have not read her book, but I did listen to her interview. (The section relevant to this thread is in the last 5 minutes, in case anyone else is interested.)
She is employing a strawman tactic to make a case. Few serious people today argue that trans women without hormone treatment do not have physical advantage over cis women. The question is whether hormone treatment can erase that advantage and whether it matters when they start their hormone treatment.
Few serious people today argue it's okay if no woman can get on the podium. The question is how many trans women on the podium would be too many, and if ONE is one too many.
If "the distinction based on sex should be evidence based" as she claims, I want to see how trans women who never went through male puberty retain their physical advantage. (This is different from cis boys' advantage over cis girls before puberty.)
She is also either uninformed or disingenuous in saying that "people with DSD are still either XX/ovaries or XY/testes." She is ignoring people with Swyer Syndrome, CAIS, and De La Chapelle Syndrome. Yes, some people with DSD do not want to be called "intersex." Many of them identify as female in spite of their Y chromosomes and testes. And they have been legally "female" their entire lives.