I didn’t notice this referenced in the thread… but more MAGA terrorism
-
24
-
RossiCheated wrote:
Sorry if this has already been covered, but why is it that the right wing is so fervently claiming that Tyler Robinson didn't commit this murder?
I mean, every social media platform and YouTube are just filled with videos, by NRA gun nuts, Joe Rogan, you name it... all right wingers, casting doubt on the "FBI narrative," and claiming the bullet came from the side or the back, showing that Robinson couldn't have had a rifle when he "escaped," and that the text messages are obviously baloney, and on and on.
Why does the right wing think that the government is lying to them?
You swallow the government narrative without question. As Bugs Bunny likes to say: "what a maroon!"
74 -
Precious Roy wrote:
Antifa sets fire to home of South Carolina federal judge who ruled for Trump in voter privacy case. When this never ending violence from the left end?
Hold on....
Oops. Turns out the judge ruled against Trump, got multiple death threats and then had her home burned down.
You jumped the gun, precious
96 -
tellin' it like it is wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
Sorry if this has already been covered, but why is it that the right wing is so fervently claiming that Tyler Robinson didn't commit this murder?
I mean, every social media platform and YouTube are just filled with videos, by NRA gun nuts, Joe Rogan, you name it... all right wingers, casting doubt on the "FBI narrative," and claiming the bullet came from the side or the back, showing that Robinson couldn't have had a rifle when he "escaped," and that the text messages are obviously baloney, and on and on.
Why does the right wing think that the government is lying to them?
You swallow the government narrative without question. As Bugs Bunny likes to say: "what a maroon!"
I'm sorry, but what narrative do you think I'm swallowing, exactly?
If you think that I think he did it, you'd be wrong. I think there is mounting evidence that he did not (although he might have been involved somehow. Who knows?). I think the right wingers are probably right about this one; he's a patsy.
I do think it is interesting that the right wing was "all in" on blaming him, the "lefty, gay guy with a furry, trans boyfriend," before doing a hard pivot and looking for "the real killers" so fervently.
36 -
RossiCheated wrote:
tellin' it like it is wrote:
You swallow the government narrative without question. As Bugs Bunny likes to say: "what a maroon!"
I'm sorry, but what narrative do you think I'm swallowing, exactly?
If you think that I think he did it, you'd be wrong. I think there is mounting evidence that he did not (although he might have been involved somehow. Who knows?). I think the right wingers are probably right about this one; he's a patsy.
I do think it is interesting that the right wing was "all in" on blaming him, the "lefty, gay guy with a furry, trans boyfriend," before doing a hard pivot and looking for "the real killers" so fervently.
I'm curious why this post gets two "thumbs down" but no replies. I'd be happy to engage on the topic, because I think the "Tyler didn't do it" position has more bipartisan support than just about any topic I have seen in a long time.
From what I see, nobody that has dug into this at all, on either side, is buying that he was the shooter from a rooftop, that the wound in the front left is the entry wound, that the bullet magically stayed in the body and didn't blast out the back, that he took the gun apart, only to put it back together across the street when he hid it, or that the text sounds like a 22-year old, or that he changed clothes in a flash, then changed back, then went to Dairy Queen...
As a Democrat, I am sincerely saying "nice job" to the right wingers that have dug into this and put out all the analysis videos.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.52 -
TheAntifaWay wrote:
Antifa are terrorists wrote:
Why does the left wing deny he was one of them?
Because Tyler’s personal life has been revealed to be that of your average leftist male. Man on man sex, furry action, Tyler’s boyfriend was a pre-op trans, etc. Any leftist dude will say “…what’s not to like?” At the same time they know how bizarre this stuff is to normal people, how strange it is, so they are dying to cover it all up.
If anything, Robinson, a paragon of leftist living and lifestyles, needs to be dragged through the mud as harshly as possible. Just because.
That’s it in a nutshell. Explains the leftist anger, their vitriol throughout the thread.
53 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Precious Roy wrote:
Antifa sets fire to home of South Carolina federal judge who ruled for Trump in voter privacy case. When this never ending violence from the left end?
Hold on....
Oops. Turns out the judge ruled against Trump, got multiple death threats and then had her home burned down.
You jumped the gun, precious
The right has definitely never jumped the gun on concluding who was responsible for something.
65 -
RossiCheated wrote:
Sorry if this has already been covered, but why is it that the right wing is so fervently claiming that Tyler Robinson didn't commit this murder?
I mean, every social media platform and YouTube are just filled with videos, by NRA gun nuts, Joe Rogan, you name it... all right wingers, casting doubt on the "FBI narrative," and claiming the bullet came from the side or the back, showing that Robinson couldn't have had a rifle when he "escaped," and that the text messages are obviously baloney, and on and on.
Why does the right wing think that the government is lying to them?
You still believe in the Warren Commission Report too. Right?
Fool.
24 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
Sorry if this has already been covered, but why is it that the right wing is so fervently claiming that Tyler Robinson didn't commit this murder?
I mean, every social media platform and YouTube are just filled with videos, by NRA gun nuts, Joe Rogan, you name it... all right wingers, casting doubt on the "FBI narrative," and claiming the bullet came from the side or the back, showing that Robinson couldn't have had a rifle when he "escaped," and that the text messages are obviously baloney, and on and on.
Why does the right wing think that the government is lying to them?
You still believe in the Warren Commission Report too. Right?
Fool.
Ummm... no. No, I don't. Actually.
What's your point?
Do you agree that Tyler Robinson probably didn't do it, or are you hanging on to the idea that he did? I have no idea.
Again, I'm a Democrat that has been persuaded by the right wingers that have dug into this. I think there is reasonable doubt all day long and twice as much on Sundays.
22 -
RossiCheated wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
You still believe in the Warren Commission Report too. Right?
Fool.
Ummm... no. No, I don't. Actually.
What's your point?
Do you agree that Tyler Robinson probably didn't do it, or are you hanging on to the idea that he did? I have no idea.
Again, I'm a Democrat that has been persuaded by the right wingers that have dug into this. I think there is reasonable doubt all day long and twice as much on Sundays.
I have doubts that Tyler Robinson was the shooter. Why hasn't the autopsy report been released?
41 -
Robinson did it. He could have been ‘pushed’ by certain forces of course, becoming an easily controlled agent of chaos, because of his being leftist, gay, a furry, into trans dudes, all this and more, creating the perfect reactionary leftist killbot, of which there are so many as of late.
08 -
31
-
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
Ummm... no. No, I don't. Actually.
What's your point?
Do you agree that Tyler Robinson probably didn't do it, or are you hanging on to the idea that he did? I have no idea.
Again, I'm a Democrat that has been persuaded by the right wingers that have dug into this. I think there is reasonable doubt all day long and twice as much on Sundays.
I have doubts that Tyler Robinson was the shooter. Why hasn't the autopsy report been released?
See! We agree!
Right and left, joinng together to look at all the available evidence (in the public domain) and lean toward a conclusion that, for now, seems more likely than not.
It's really this simple... if the wound on the front left is an exit (and all the right wing gun guys have convinced me it is), then the round cannot have come from the rooftop he was supposedly on, and he is excluded as the possible shooter (assuming he is the person the FBI told us ran across that rooftop and climbed down).
My questions include:
Why did the police fail to secure the crime scene, allowing people to move through it, to remove camaras and memory cards, and move thigns around?
Why was the crime scene paved over and reconstructed within days, before an investigation could conclude and the defense team could analyze it?
And many more questions that are logical and fair, regardless of whether we be on the "right" or the "left.".
21 -
the pIot thickens wrote:
Honestly, if you go down the road that he was killed because he was a becoming a huge threat to Israel and calling for the Epstein files to be removed, then you can believe that a team killed him...
...and this video might show the killers.
10 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
Ummm... no. No, I don't. Actually.
What's your point?
Do you agree that Tyler Robinson probably didn't do it, or are you hanging on to the idea that he did? I have no idea.
Again, I'm a Democrat that has been persuaded by the right wingers that have dug into this. I think there is reasonable doubt all day long and twice as much on Sundays.
I have doubts that Tyler Robinson was the shooter. Why hasn't the autopsy report been released?
Do not forget the words of Thomas Pynchon (about the JFK assasination):
Thomas Pynchon wrote:
The only thing worse than a conspiracy is no conspiracy at all.The autopsy report has not been released because it has no evidentiary value. Kirk was murdered in public, with cameras rolling from multiple angles. The murder weapon has been retrieved and, based on media reports, linked to the suspect. The suspect had the means and a motive.
21 -
RossiCheated wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
I have doubts that Tyler Robinson was the shooter. Why hasn't the autopsy report been released?
See! We agree!
Right and left, joinng together to look at all the available evidence (in the public domain) and lean toward a conclusion that, for now, seems more likely than not.
It's really this simple... if the wound on the front left is an exit (and all the right wing gun guys have convinced me it is), then the round cannot have come from the rooftop he was supposedly on, and he is excluded as the possible shooter (assuming he is the person the FBI told us ran across that rooftop and climbed down).
My questions include:
Why did the police fail to secure the crime scene, allowing people to move through it, to remove camaras and memory cards, and move thigns around?
Why was the crime scene paved over and reconstructed within days, before an investigation could conclude and the defense team could analyze it?
And many more questions that are logical and fair, regardless of whether we be on the "right" or the "left.".
1) Why did the police fail to secure the crime scene?
They didn't. If you look at the picture in this article (about a man who was arrested for trespassing on a secure crime scene), you will see the crime scene is both taped off and guarded:
2) Why was the crime scene paved over and reconstructed...?
It wasn't. Where are you getting this from? Do you mean paved over and restricted exactly as it appeared before? You made the claim, so please provide the evidence to support it.
3) Many more questions that are logical and fair...
This is a solid point. Right now, I am asking myself, why am I entering into a debate with someone who *cannot* be convinced otherwise. Because I have to much time on my hands and because I'm genuinely curious if I will get a response.
You are welcome to believe that Kirk was murdered by anyone other than the suspect. It changes very little. But I sense this upset, frustration even, in your reasoning. Let's set that aside.
Do me a favor: prove me wrong. It's what Kirk would have wanted.
00 -
JustMe22 wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
See! We agree!
Right and left, joinng together to look at all the available evidence (in the public domain) and lean toward a conclusion that, for now, seems more likely than not.
It's really this simple... if the wound on the front left is an exit (and all the right wing gun guys have convinced me it is), then the round cannot have come from the rooftop he was supposedly on, and he is excluded as the possible shooter (assuming he is the person the FBI told us ran across that rooftop and climbed down).
My questions include:
Why did the police fail to secure the crime scene, allowing people to move through it, to remove camaras and memory cards, and move thigns around?
Why was the crime scene paved over and reconstructed within days, before an investigation could conclude and the defense team could analyze it?
And many more questions that are logical and fair, regardless of whether we be on the "right" or the "left.".
1) Why did the police fail to secure the crime scene?
They didn't. If you look at the picture in this article (about a man who was arrested for trespassing on a secure crime scene), you will see the crime scene is both taped off and guarded:
2) Why was the crime scene paved over and reconstructed...?
It wasn't. Where are you getting this from? Do you mean paved over and restricted exactly as it appeared before? You made the claim, so please provide the evidence to support it.
3) Many more questions that are logical and fair...
This is a solid point. Right now, I am asking myself, why am I entering into a debate with someone who *cannot* be convinced otherwise. Because I have to much time on my hands and because I'm genuinely curious if I will get a response.
You are welcome to believe that Kirk was murdered by anyone other than the suspect. It changes very little. But I sense this upset, frustration even, in your reasoning. Let's set that aside.
Do me a favor: prove me wrong. It's what Kirk would have wanted.
If a crime scene is locked down (which could have happened immediately by the police on site), a guy from TPUSA wouldn't have been removing a camera and handing the memory card off to a guy that sticks it in a hat and walks away.
You can't "pave over" something exactly as it was before. Paving over, in and of itself, is changing it. So is putting in paving stones. There are endless before and after videos. They reconstructed it.
Those are the first videos I found because I'm not going to spend a lot of time on this. The videos are endless.
As for saying that I cannot be convinced otherwise... that is inaccurate and unfair. I have been convinced to question the narrative by people who I normally do not pay attention to, like Candace Owens. But when the facts support their position, it is worth looking into. Can YOUR mind be changed?
EDIT TO ADD: Why would I be upset or frustrated? I'm not. I see this like a math or logical reasoning problem, in which the solution being offered doesn't fit the parameters of the problem. That makes it intellectually interesting.
This post was edited 9 minutes after it was posted.10 -
Just a reminder that this kind of thing is super dangerous in today's world. Some local A/V guy who is there to film the event for some cash is now being accused of murdering Charlie Kirk. Be careful what kind of information you're sharing online. You don't want to contribute to this kind of thing.
01 -
10
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.