Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

bb8 wrote:

Bill Clinton deserves the Cy Young Award for his relieving efforts whenever the GOP is in trouble for sex related scandals.

And it was the Right who went there! Could they have walked away and been given the same privilege? Sure. It isn't right, but that's a funny feature about humans. But, no. Gingrich and the rest of the wackos went there.

Sez the guy wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Disappointed. Yes. Distraught? Not even close. Also, I posted the day after the election. Other than that, nothing interesting was happening for a while...took a while before we really knew what we elected.

If Hillary would have won it would have taken awhile for you to really know what you elected.

You're in denial Flagpole, period.

If she had won, she COULD then have been under the kind of scrutiny that Trump is currently under. IF that scrutiny then proved that she was a criminal, I would be against her as I am now against Trump. I jumped off the Bill Clinton bandwagon when he did things I didn't like, so I am very capable of stopping support for someone based on their actions.

Right now, we don't have any proof that Hillary is the criminal many of you say she is. She has been investigated to the teeth and nothing ever sticks. So far the law has said she is not a criminal. I am a Rule of Law person, so until we see otherwise, I will not believe she is a criminal.

The fact is that Trump won the election and then he and his staff did some things to raise flags and kick off the Mueller investigation. It's all based on their actions.

He will be exposed.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

THAT is Ronald Reagan!

DiscoGary wrote:

uk person wrote:

It isn't "state sponsored" it's crowd funded. FAKE NEWS.

The mayor of London Kahn gave the go ahead for flying it near the HoP. It is now state sponsored.

Kahn gave it permission to fly which ISN’T the same as state sponsorship. The government isn’t funding it. It’s crowd funded. Stop lying about my country.

Straight out the trailer wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Oh...I forgot the HUGE biceps. Bro dad does his biceps curls in the backyard...three sets of 10 reps with 25 pound dumbbells. He actually says it out loud before he does it, so that's how I know what he's doing. He needs to do the 3x3 method with heavier weights to get those guns anywhere close to the size of mine. Ah bro dad...you try hard, but you don't have the knowledge.

Serious question.

Do you live in a trailer park?

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

uk person wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

The mayor of London Kahn gave the go ahead for flying it near the HoP. It is now state sponsored.

Kahn gave it permission to fly which ISN’T the same as state sponsorship. The government isn’t funding it. It’s crowd funded. Stop lying about my country.

So if the queen visited the US and someone made a nasty balloon caricature of her paid for with private funds, and if Trump gave the OK to fly the balloon over the White House while she was there, and if you said that the balloon was state sponsored, and I replied that state didn’t pay for it so it wasn’t state sponsored ... what would you say to me?

Flagpole wrote:

The clown is done.

The clown is done. Long live the clown.

DiscoGary wrote:

So if the queen visited the US and someone made a nasty balloon caricature of her paid for with private funds, and if Trump gave the OK to fly the balloon over the White House while she was there, and if you said that the balloon was state sponsored, and I replied that state didn’t pay for it so it wasn’t state sponsored ... what would you say to me?

There's good people on both sides?

DEEP STATE!!!!!!

DiscoGary wrote:

uk person wrote:

Kahn gave it permission to fly which ISN’T the same as state sponsorship. The government isn’t funding it. It’s crowd funded. Stop lying about my country.

So if the queen visited the US and someone made a nasty balloon caricature of her paid for with private funds, and if Trump gave the OK to fly the balloon over the White House while she was there, and if you said that the balloon was state sponsored, and I replied that state didn’t pay for it so it wasn’t state sponsored ... what would you say to me?

Such a bizarre way of constructing your hyperthetical counter argument but ok:

1. I wouldn’t say it was state sponsored because I know the difference between state funds and private funds.

2. If, as in your hyperthetical, I had said “it was state sponsored” and then you said to me “the state didn’t pay for it”, I would then say “sorry, my mistake, you are correct, it isn’t state sponsored.” (See how convoluted my reply has to be).

3. Everyone both sides of the Atlantic has a right to protest.

4. You should apologize or retract your statement.

Yes, he should. . . But this is Lying Gary that you are conversing with. He NEVER apologizes, NEVER retracts, NEVER admits to . . .

He's Lying Gary, the perfect Trump mini-me.

T Trash wrote:

Straight out the trailer wrote:

Serious question.

Do you live in a trailer park?

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

I take his silence as a “yes.”

Straight out the trailer wrote:

T Trash wrote:

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

I take his silence as a “yes.”

Ha! I would never live in a trailer park, not because there is anything inherently wrong with people who live there, but because, other than the fact a strong wind can destroy your home, it's a bad financial decision. Mobile homes lose value as opposed to traditional single-family homes, AND then you also have to pay rent on the space, a rent that can and does go up over time.

I just have a couple of bros who live in a rented house adjacent to my backyard. I live in a very diverse neighborhood, and their broism is just part of the mix. Fine by me. If their bro behavior negatively impacts me, I will make them stop that behavior, but as of now, all is fine, and I expect it to stay that way.

You going to take care of it yourself or go through the HOA?

bb8 wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

For students of political science this post is a great example of what I call "historical guilt" that the Right uses when it becomes clear that their side has done something really bad and it can't be spun or hidden. Here's how it works:

Go back in time as far as necessary to find a crime committed by a democrat that is as bad or worse than the current scandal.

Disco,

I fixed a few words for you. You can't even see when your precious right wingers use the "well, what about......"tactic.

Bill Clinton deserves the Cy Young Award for his relieving efforts whenever the GOP is in trouble for sex related scandals.

My post was a liberal cry out for help. We lost and we suck as a party. Sorry fellow dems, it's the truth.

Hey Dude! wrote:

uk person wrote:

Such a bizarre way of constructing your hyperthetical counter argument but ok:

1. I wouldn’t say it was state sponsored because I know the difference between state funds and private funds.

2. If, as in your hyperthetical, I had said “it was state sponsored” and then you said to me “the state didn’t pay for it”, I would then say “sorry, my mistake, you are correct, it isn’t state sponsored.” (See how convoluted my reply has to be).

3. Everyone both sides of the Atlantic has a right to protest.

4. You should apologize or retract your statement.

Yes, he should. . . But this is Lying Gary that you are conversing with. He NEVER apologizes, NEVER retracts, NEVER admits to . . .

He's Lying Gary, the perfect Trump mini-me.

Like us on the left, we NEVER apologize, retract or admit anything. We are the perfect Clinton mini-me.

I have rarely ever had a problem with a neighbor, but on the couple of times I did, I just mowed the yard with my shirt off, and they know what's what.

Heidi Cruz wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

So if the queen visited the US and someone made a nasty balloon caricature of her paid for with private funds, and if Trump gave the OK to fly the balloon over the White House while she was there, and if you said that the balloon was state sponsored, and I replied that state didn’t pay for it so it wasn’t state sponsored ... what would you say to me?

There's good people on both sides?

smack

Flagpole wrote:

Bro Neighbor wrote:

You going to take care of it yourself or go through the HOA?

I have rarely ever had a problem with a neighbor, but on the couple of times I did, I just mowed the yard with my shirt off, and they know what's what.

No doubt.