Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I hope Trump comments about the baby balloon. Just one more swipe at free speech. Any person or country who doesn't absolutely kiss his a$$ is attacked by him, and even those who do kiss his a$$ (see Michael Cohen and Reince Priebus for starters), they won't be in good graces for long.

You need to be either a dictator or Ivanka to remain in the good graces of Trump. No one else is immune to his wrath...err, his infantile tantrums.

How does the Left in Britain or the US gain anything by doing this?

Why are you being so butthurt on Trump’s behalf and why do you hate freedom of speech so much? This is how people rally support, it’s how they show others what they think. Trump tweets to the world, others blow up balloons and others paint, who cares? You are really fvcking stupid if you think it’s unfair that Trump, our of all people, is catching flak from protesters around the globe. He literally asks for it every single day. He loves it because he wants you to keep believing he’s a victim, just like he makes you keep believing you are a victim. The main thing you have in common with Trump is that you are both self-declared victims, while completely disregarding exactly how you got to that point. He doesn’t give a fvck about you or America, but you are too blinded by your victim hood to see that.

Gary, I found a quote from a dirty Liberal President who opened America's borders:

immigrants "brought with them courage and the values of family, work, and freedom. Let us pledge to each other that we can make America great again."

Guess which President you can blame!

agip wrote:

he might be right on this. Trump is so good at insult politics that trying to beat him at it just makes you look lame. And dems wouldn't get excited about an amoral con man. Only repubs do that.

I'm with Gary on this one - Dems probably can't win a battle of insults and mockery - Dems are too good as people and Trump is too mean and nasty and talented an insult comic for that to work.

You nailed it gary. Repubs are nasty, awful people who respond to insults and threats of violence. Dems are better than that. good call.

I get what you're doing here. The sentiment is right on the money of course. As a practical matter, if it were all Twitter-based, you'd have a point. A Trump baby balloon though is pretty good and says a lot. I think that's a pretty good protest.

Trollminator wrote:

why do you hate freedom of speech so much?

Fascism. Disagreement is treason.

foo wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

On the contrary. Don't take away CA. Make it so that Trump needs CA or at least part of it to win, and he would have campaigned there and gotten whatever votes he needed to win. How do I know this? Because that's exactly what he did in the states he needed. He just didn't need CA. Change the rules and Trump's campaign changes and the vote totals change.

Again. A simple concept that Liberals can't seem to grasp.

If CA was in play, both candidates would have aggressively campaigned here and the turnout would have been huge in a highly Democratic state. HRC would have won the popular vote by even a greater margin.

Why would you say that? PA, OH, MI, and WI were in play but Hillary couldn't win those when she had to. C'mon guys. Concentrate. Put the hate aside and let some logic shine through. Trump did what he had to do to win. Hillary either did not, or could not do what she had to do. Logic tells us that if the rules were changed, then Trump would have changed what he did, and that Hillary probably would have failed even with the new rules.

Spin all you want on this thread, but don't fool yourselves.

Dude, you are the one who said, "So far, it's Libs who show up in person to shoot Republicans or beat people into submission." Total BS of an insinuation. I didn't even mention the conservative gun nuts who killed gay people in a club in Florida, who opened fire on concert goers in Las Vegas, who killed children in schools across America. Again, as I said initially, I don't paint conservatives with a broad brush here, and you should not do it for liberals. That liberal who shot at Republicans play softball doesn't uphold liberal values anymore than Tim McVeigh upholds conservative values. You were wrong to do it and I called you out on it. There are things you can be critical of with regard to Democrats, but shooting people is not it. Try again with something else. You can't win with this line.

Flagpole wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Naw. It's pretty good. I have no problem with stupid 20-somethings having fun as long as they don't harm anyone or anything. I can coexist with Trump bros. I can't expect everyone close to me to be as smart as me, as good looking as me, as enlightened as me, so I accept them as they are.

Oh...I forgot the HUGE biceps. Bro dad does his biceps curls in the backyard...three sets of 10 reps with 25 pound dumbbells. He actually says it out loud before he does it, so that's how I know what he's doing. He needs to do the 3x3 method with heavier weights to get those guns anywhere close to the size of mine. Ah bro dad...you try hard, but you don't have the knowledge.

Good gracious, son. Where do you live. It sounds like the redneck sticks.

Hey look! You DO understand it, but you just can't help yourselves can you? Insulting Trump binds him to everyone else who has been insulted by the Left for decades. Shake off the hate buddy. Focus. The logical conclusion is that continuing this barrage of Trump insults will continue to strengthen his base. Therefore, flying a state sponsored caricature of Trump over London will be counter-productive. Right? You following me here?

The way to weaken Trump is to STOP insulting him and his followers every day and tell his followers "We get it. We called you uneducated racists for decades, blamed you for things you didn't do, treated you like second class citizens, and on our best day we ignored you and that was wrong. We apologize and we're going to make it up to you. We are going to treat you fairly from now on. Here are the changes we're making in policy XYZ to fix it."

If I'm general of the Liberal army, those are the orders I give.

DiscoGary wrote:

Herewegoagain! wrote:

His arguments are pretty weak and are based on intentional delusion. He only wants to win and be right. He doesn't care about governing, human lives, or making things better.

I can't even have a rational discussion with him because he's too far gone. He can't see past the cons/lib divide. He's infantile in his observations and juvenile in his rebuttals.

Oh, so name calling is your way to have a "productive conversation". Sneering condescension passes for "intellect" on the Left but it doesn't win any debates.

That ain't name calling that's just attacking your arguments as being infantile. Did you learn this kind of misrepresentation from Fox? An example of name-calling would be to call someone leftist, or a cvnt.

nothing to see here wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Oh, so name calling is your way to have a "productive conversation". Sneering condescension passes for "intellect" on the Left but it doesn't win any debates.

That ain't name calling that's just attacking your arguments as being infantile. Did you learn this kind of misrepresentation from Fox? An example of name-calling would be to call someone leftist, or a cvnt.

I was expecting him to show us all how to have productive discussion. All we got was name calling.

I called his bluff. He had nothing. I won the hand.

DiscoGary wrote:

I was expecting him to show us all how to have productive discussion. All we got was name calling.

I called his bluff. He had nothing. I won the hand.

Gary, I'm completely open to discussion.

However, you cannot seem to talk without actually name calling. Your use of leftist, liberal, the left, and other manes really speak volumes of your mindset. You cannot see past the rat maze you live in. You seem to wait for Big Brother to tell you who to hate this week and who to try to discredit in your online "discussions".

Gary, the guy who claims to win a competition that never even existed.

DiscoGary wrote:

foo wrote:

If CA was in play, both candidates would have aggressively campaigned here and the turnout would have been huge in a highly Democratic state. HRC would have won the popular vote by even a greater margin.

Why would you say that? PA, OH, MI, and WI were in play but Hillary couldn't win those when she had to. C'mon guys. Concentrate. Put the hate aside and let some logic shine through. Trump did what he had to do to win. Hillary either did not, or could not do what she had to do. Logic tells us that if the rules were changed, then Trump would have changed what he did, and that Hillary probably would have failed even with the new rules.

Spin all you want on this thread, but don't fool yourselves.

Woulda, coulda, shoulda...didn't. You can't know if he would have won all those votes in a very traditionally liberal state if the rules were changed. You would come off better if you just either ignore the popular vote thing (because it makes us know it bothers you) or just mention who the president is. He won the election. That is crystal clear. He lost the popular vote. That is also crystal clear.

Trump will lose his legitimacy in the end when it is proven that he and/or his staff colluded with Russia to help him win. He will be the Ben Johnson of the Presidency.

DG, I honestly hope you find some peace somehow in a constructive way when Trump is no longer in office. Even if by some miracle he were to last 8 years in office with no legal or political consequences, the country as a whole is NOT moving toward a Trump vision. Don't kid yourself there. Every day old people die and young people become old enough to vote. Populism doesn't last. This era WILL be over at some point, and I predict sooner than later.

You seem to be the most bothered about this than anyone who posts here. Trump isn't YOU, brother. The president, no matter who he or she is, doesn't have the power to make you happy or sad or at least they shouldn't...not in this country at least. Drink your beer...play the guitar (or whatever you do for fun). As much as I don't like Trump because I think he's a horrible person and a criminal, his being in office can't really affect my happiness. Many of his policies suck, but so did some of the policies of Bush and Bush and Reagan and Clinton and Obama. I had happy times during all those presidencies, and I have had then since Trump has been in office. I have had 2 vacations already in 2018 and I have two more planned before the end of the year. I still play music every day. I still have money in the stock market that continues to grow over time as it did with all the other presidents.

You won't lose anything when Trump is no longer President. You need some Bobby McFerrin -- Don't Worry, Be Happy.

So Pruitt is resigning because of personal attacks on his family. I'm telling you guys. You don't want to do it this way. This is bad stuff. Can you imagine what kind of bad-ass Trump is going to have to find to take Pruitt's place? I'm tellin ya Lucy! This aint gonna end well. You shouldn't want to live in a country where attacks on officials' families become common place. You'd better dial up the decency fast.

"However, the unrelenting attacks on me personally, my family, are unprecedented and have taken a sizable toll on all of us."

http://freebeacon.com/politics/exclusive-scott-pruitts-resignation-letter/

Says the guy who was so distraught after election night that he didn’t post here for 3 months.

Lol

DiscoGary wrote:

foo wrote:

If CA was in play, both candidates would have aggressively campaigned here and the turnout would have been huge in a highly Democratic state. HRC would have won the popular vote by even a greater margin.

Why would you say that? PA, OH, MI, and WI were in play but Hillary couldn't win those when she had to. C'mon guys. Concentrate. Put the hate aside and let some logic shine through. Trump did what he had to do to win. Hillary either did not, or could not do what she had to do. Logic tells us that if the rules were changed, then Trump would have changed what he did, and that Hillary probably would have failed even with the new rules.

Spin all you want on this thread, but don't fool yourselves.

Uh, because as I mentioned, CA is 2/3 Democratic. Those other states are called "swing states" for a reason.

Yes, Trump won those states, barely. I'm sorry, but believing that Trump could even have been moderately successful in CA is highly delusional.

Yeah Gary, he resigned because of personal attacks on his family? Not because of the egregious disrespect he has for the country and the department he headed? Come on!?

Again, you're gas lighting and spinning this as he's some innocent man who didn't do anything to deserve the vitriol.

Trump is a troll and presents the same problem as any other troll.

Ignore him and he can get away with say anything unchallenged or call him out and lose by virtue of playing the game on his turf.

I doubt it matters all that much what the liberals do. It's up to Trump's base to figure out that pissing on everybody else hasn't improved their own lot. Perhaps then the centrists can move in and clean up the mess.

Flagpole wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Naw. It's pretty good. I have no problem with stupid 20-somethings having fun as long as they don't harm anyone or anything. I can coexist with Trump bros. I can't expect everyone close to me to be as smart as me, as good looking as me, as enlightened as me, so I accept them as they are.

Oh...I forgot the HUGE biceps. Bro dad does his biceps curls in the backyard...three sets of 10 reps with 25 pound dumbbells. He actually says it out loud before he does it, so that's how I know what he's doing. He needs to do the 3x3 method with heavier weights to get those guns anywhere close to the size of mine. Ah bro dad...you try hard, but you don't have the knowledge.

Serious question.

Do you live in a trailer park?

Go cry us a river, oh aggrieved one. Pruitt resigned because of the multitude of ethical lapses he had. Even conservative pundits and congressional reps from his own party said it was time to go. Anyone else from any other administration would have been sent packing long ago.

Stop your perpetual cry of victimhood. Your whiney tears sway no one.