Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Those people were paid for and sent there by Hillary to agitate the crowd, to violate Trump's right to free speech and his followers' right to assemble, to instigate violence from a Trump supporter with the certain knowledge that the violence would be blamed on Trump by a sympathetic MSM. It worked. You fell for it. You got played. You are gullible.

You'll notice that Trump supporters weren't going around shutting down Hillary or Bernie rallies. If Trump supporters were so violent then why didn't that happen?

DiscoGary wrote:

It is the job of the Federal government to control the borders and make sure people living here illegally are caught and dealt with. Businesses should not have to do the job that the Feds refuse to do, so they should be able to hire anyone living in the US without penalty.

So, you want anyone who can vote to be able to provide a photo ID, but you are ok with companies hiring illegal workers who have no documentation proving who they are and where they are from? That makes zero sense. You DO realize that if companies were penalized for hiring illegal workers and stopped doing it that far fewer would try to come here to work illegally, right?

Also, what's with you wanting the government to do everything? Sounds like BIG GOVERNMENT to me, not exactly a conservative or libertarian view.

I see...you want government intervention only when it suits you. Got it. There's a name for that, and it's 'hypocrite'.

But, beyond being a hypocrite, you are simply backing a horrible criminal person, and that is your most egregious error.

“Those people were paid for and sent there by Hillary to agitate the crowd, to violate Trump's right to free speech”

^^^ I would laugh harder if this wasn’t further proof that your head is missing a few screws

My advice is ? the Deep State might be monitoring hahahahahaha

Trollminator wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Those people were paid for and sent there by Hillary to agitate the crowd, to violate Trump's right to free speech and his followers' right to assemble, to instigate violence from a Trump supporter with the certain knowledge that the violence would be blamed on Trump by a sympathetic MSM. It worked. You fell for it. You got played. You are gullible.

You'll notice that Trump supporters weren't going around shutting down Hillary or Bernie rallies. If Trump supporters were so violent then why didn't that happen?

“Those people were paid for and sent there by Hillary to agitate the crowd, to violate Trump's right to free speech”

^^^ I would laugh harder if this wasn’t further proof that your head is missing a few screws

My advice is ? the Deep State might be monitoring hahahahahaha

Proof that Hillary paid operatives to do exactly what I just described:

"FOVAL: So one of the things we do is we stage very authentic grassroots protests right in their faces at their own events. Like, we infiltrate. And then we get it on tape. And then, when our guys get beat up ..."

Trollminator wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Those people were paid for and sent there by Hillary to agitate the crowd, to violate Trump's right to free speech and his followers' right to assemble, to instigate violence from a Trump supporter with the certain knowledge that the violence would be blamed on Trump by a sympathetic MSM. It worked. You fell for it. You got played. You are gullible.

You'll notice that Trump supporters weren't going around shutting down Hillary or Bernie rallies. If Trump supporters were so violent then why didn't that happen?

“Those people were paid for and sent there by Hillary to agitate the crowd, to violate Trump's right to free speech”

^^^ I would laugh harder if this wasn’t further proof that your head is missing a few screws

My advice is ? the Deep State might be monitoring hahahahahaha

Human to human, I am seriously worried about DG.

I am ok with him just being wrong though, and it will be proven that I am right about Trump. Seems to me like not a leap whatsoever to say Trump is going down, but I keep getting push back on this even from some on the left. So, when Trump finally does go down, no one can tell me that "everyone saw it", because clearly not everyone does.

Trumpers remain delusional OR I suppose perhaps evil OR dumb...it is one of those three. Regardless of policy wishes, you simply can't sell your soul (your integrity) to follow such a horrible corrupt person.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

DiscoGary wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

“Those people were paid for and sent there by Hillary to agitate the crowd, to violate Trump's right to free speech”

^^^ I would laugh harder if this wasn’t further proof that your head is missing a few screws

My advice is ? the Deep State might be monitoring hahahahahaha

Proof that Hillary paid operatives to do exactly what I just described:

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/17/exclusive-okeefe-video-sting-exposes-bird-dogging-democrats-effort-to-incite-violence-at-trump-rallies/

"FOVAL: So one of the things we do is we stage very authentic grassroots protests right in their faces at their own events. Like, we infiltrate. And then we get it on tape. And then, when our guys get beat up ..."

Veritas and Breitbart?

Oy vey.

DiscoGary wrote:

It is the job of the Federal government to control the borders and make sure people living here illegally are caught and dealt with. Businesses should not have to do the job that the Feds refuse to do, so they should be able to hire anyone living in the US without penalty.

You're making the job of controlling the borders that much more difficult by allowing businesses not to require proof of citizenship to be employed.

The incentive to cross the border and reward of crossing is much greater when you can employ anyone living in the US.

Why do you want the feds to spend more money on border resources if the demand can be lessened?

I have my own little anecdote from yesterday...

The neighbors who live behind me in a rented house are a couple of bros. Giant lifted 4x4 pickup, dirt bikes, the whole thing.

The 40ish dad barbecues pretty much daily, usually with his shirt off, and his ~20 year old son is there about half the time. No woman in the picture.

On the 4th, the son and some of his friends (men and women) decided to grill some stuff and then pull their pants half down and light bottle rockets out of their butt cracks. we heard the bottle rockets, took a look to see what was going on and then saw several of them do the butt crack thing. That was the limit of our interest. They were quite boisterous, and as we were eating dinner (with the blinds CLOSED), after some bottle rockets went off and some yelling, we heard, "That looks bad bro!"

What does this have to do with anything?

One of them was wearing a Make America Great Again hat. I am sure he is on his way to helping that become a reality.

L L wrote:

So we have some differences on immigration and how to handle those that show up at our border or make it through.

Do you agree that part of the problem are Americans who illegally employee undocumented immigrants and that provides the incentive for illegal crossings?

And what's your view on American's demand for illegally imported drugs?

Odd how Melania's parents and sister [Ines Knavs/Knauss] emigrated to the USA and are being granted citizenship. I did not know that Slovenia and the USA shared a border. And the Slovenia forced to them to flee for their lives. Oh, and the sister happens to live in a $2-Million Park Avenue apartment owned by the Trump Organization--a nice tax write-off for Trump.

1) those two are mutually exclusive. Stop being intellectually lazy.

2) Companies ARE penalized for hiring illegal immigrants.

If you’re going to try and make a gotcha point, at least make sense doing it.

Update:

The a$$hole has been identified and fired from his job.

https://heavy.com/news/2018/07/kino-jimenez/

1) No they aren't.

2) Gary doesn't want them to be penalized at all, and while they are, it obviously isn't enough or they would stop doing it. If it's not a deterrent, then it's not really a penalty.

3) I don't make "gotcha" points, just points. I just don't understand his hypocrisy.

Just so philosophical differences don't obscure the reality...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

L L wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

It is the job of the Federal government to control the borders and make sure people living here illegally are caught and dealt with. Businesses should not have to do the job that the Feds refuse to do, so they should be able to hire anyone living in the US without penalty.

You're making the job of controlling the borders that much more difficult by allowing businesses not to require proof of citizenship to be employed.

The incentive to cross the border and reward of crossing is much greater when you can employ anyone living in the US.

Why do you want the feds to spend more money on border resources if the demand can be lessened?

Because it isn't the job of companies to enforce immigration laws. It's like making anyone who walks on the sidewalk responsible for catching jaywalkers. We don't do that because law enforcement should be done by law enforcement officials. Simple stuff.

You are failing to separate principles from practical realities. It WOULD work better if companies were harshly punished for hiring illegals, but the principles aren't good. It WOULD work better if we simply shot everyone crossing the border illegally, but the principles aren't good. You are playing gotcha politics, and you can do that, but it doesn't make for a coherent discussion. This is the problem with the Liberal approach to immigration. There's no good faith attempt to fix the laws and control the border in some sane way. Everything is being done to undermine the laws and create chaos and division. It's all Alinsky tactics.

You can see your neighbors from your back yard? I thought you were doing better than that financially.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Update:

The a$$hole has been identified and fired from his job.

https://heavy.com/news/2018/07/kino-jimenez/

Well, certainly within the rights of his company to fire him for being a boorish punk. I have no problem with his firing. Throwing a drink in someone's face, using a racial slur, and stealing private property is not something people should do. I see no charges were filed. Seems at least theft of his property should be considered. If the perpetrator has any integrity at all, he will just replace the hat, return the hat, or provide money for the cost of the hat.

???

I live in a residential suburban neighborhood. It's a very nice neighborhood, and I would choose to live here (until I retire) even if I had 10 times the worth I have now (and that would be a lot) unless the neighborhood goes down hill. I won't be friends with the bros behind me, but they keep to themselves most of the time, so I'm ok with that.

Being successful financially isn't shown by the house you live in but by the debts you don't have and the investments you do have.

Flagpole wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

You can see your neighbors from your back yard? I thought you were doing better than that financially.

???

I live in a residential suburban neighborhood. It's a very nice neighborhood, and I would choose to live here (until I retire) even if I had 10 times the worth I have now (and that would be a lot) unless the neighborhood goes down hill. I won't be friends with the bros behind me, but they keep to themselves most of the time, so I'm ok with that.

Being successful financially isn't shown by the house you live in but by the debts you don't have and the investments you do have.

Uh, that was just a little tweak for fun, not meant to be a serious challenge. I would think one so financially gifted would be able to afford a sense of humor.

Oh, and isn't living next to butt-crack fireworks a sign that the neighborhood has already gone down hill?

Dude, you could not be more wrong.

Guess we don't need anyone with a conceal carry permit then if we can just rely on law enforcement to do all law enforcement. Hope you're not the only one around if someone is in need and the police are far away.

Also, no one is saying companies have to enforce immigration laws, but they DO need to follow the laws that say you can't hire an illegal immigrant.

Womp womp

Gary the buffoon

Womp womp

Gary’s afraid

Womp womp

Gary makes stuff up

Womp womp

Gary can’t shut up

Womp womp

Gary projects his biases

Womp womp

Gary makes inaccurate assumptions

Womp womp womp!