Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Dum dum pub wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Strozk- loses his security clearance. But, but, but he did nothing wrong, scream the libs!!!!!!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5874449/FBI-agent-Peter-Strzok-lost-security-clearance-says-Sessions-Trump-called-firing.html

He lost it because he had an affair num nuts. That’s frowned upon at the FBI, ya know.

Mueller fired Strozk from his team because of the anti-Trump bias. "The (OIG) report stated Strzok and four other FBI employees were referred for disciplinary action because of anti-Trump text messages they sent in 2016 and 2017." Try again.

L L wrote:

"Republicans should stop wasting their time on Immigration until after we elect more Senators and Congressmen/women in November," Trump tweeted. "Dems are just playing games, have no intention of doing anything to solves this decades old problem. We can pass great legislation after the Red Wave!"

Do you realize how crazy this is?

Trump totally punted on immigration reform.

He expects Republicans to flip 9 Democrat senators, hold all Republican senator seats and win the majority of House seats in November.

Then try immigration again in January.

That is not going to happen.

Even the most optimistic, non-delusional Republicans know that is not going to happen.

What else would you expect from the Swamp Leader in Chief?

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Dum dum pub wrote:

He lost it because he had an affair num nuts. That’s frowned upon at the FBI, ya know.

Mueller fired Strozk from his team because of the anti-Trump bias. "The (OIG) report stated Strzok and four other FBI employees were referred for disciplinary action because of anti-Trump text messages they sent in 2016 and 2017." Try again.

They were referred by Trump and Sessions. Meanwhile, FBI agents who have tweeted anti-Hillary and anti-Obama text messages are considered FBI heroes.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Mueller fired Strozk from his team because of the anti-Trump bias. "The (OIG) report stated Strzok and four other FBI employees were referred for disciplinary action because of anti-Trump text messages they sent in 2016 and 2017." Try again.

The Guardian's Spencer Ackerman reported that one current FBI agent said of the bureau, "The FBI is Trumpland." Sources said that many in the bureau openly talk about voting for Donald Trump, a presidential candidate who has joked about Clinton being assassinated and who promises to "lock her up." The revelations have many people concerned about what the anti-Clinton sentiment could mean for the FBI if Hillary Clinton is elected.

Things that don't wrote:

Things that make you go hmmmmm wrote:

Makes you wonder if Gary’s football and cheerleader analogy is correct.

Both sides really only care about limiting the success of the other side. They really don’t care about the issues. They only care to oppose the other side, even if they once agreed with that particular position or if their side once did the same thing.

Not really.

People on the left would always be outraged by policies causing innocent children to be taken from their parents needlessly. And Democrats would always be looking for ways to strengthen the safety net (ala the ACA).

So no, your point does not hold at all.

They weren’t when Obama did the same thing.

Faux outrage.

Dems against the original version of healthcare reform proposed by Pubs long before Obama Care proposed the same thing. Dems against RomneyCare.

Trollimator being for tariffs on China before he was against them. Another.

More and more and more.

L L wrote:

"Republicans should stop wasting their time on Immigration until after we elect more Senators and Congressmen/women in November," Trump tweeted. "Dems are just playing games, have no intention of doing anything to solves this decades old problem. We can pass great legislation after the Red Wave!"

Do you realize how crazy this is?

Trump totally punted on immigration reform.

He expects Republicans to flip 9 Democrat senators, hold all Republican senator seats and win the majority of House seats in November.

Then try immigration again in January.

une

That is not going to happen.

Even the most optimistic, non-delusional Republicans know that is not going to happen.

Haha, what a Liberal Load. Let's see, we have a fake Time magazine cover, a resist hashtag, a leftist run media continuing to use little kids as political pawns in their propaganda "ministry." Contrast that with a booming economy, low unemployment, record high consumer confidence, continuing peace talks with North Korea and a booming economy.

Trump wins, America wins and the libs continue to b*tch, moan & complain.

M.A.G.A.!!!

L L wrote:

Trumpette wrote:

But the faux outrage on the left has been spectacular.

People on the left get upset when they see a Republican policy enacted that causes innocent young children to be taken from their parents who are fleeing danger.

The right calls that " faux outrage".

Meanwhile, Democrats pass the Affordable Care Act, which is a law designed to help healthcare be more affordable to people with low income.

And THAT enrages people on the right.

I actually disagree. I think pumping up the perception that there is "outrage" attracts eyeballs. Judging by the low voter turnouts, people just aren't that interested in politics. So, the Right mischaracterizes the "Liberals" and vice versa.

In no uncertain terms is holding children hostage morally right. From a policy perspective, holding children hostage is:

1. Incredibly expensive.

2. Legally extremely complicated. The child's status legal changes such that a parent has no standing in court. Ooops! No one talked to legal.

3. Doesn't actually accomplish the goal of restricting immigration.

So, not only is it morally repugnant, but it a few weeks of this broken policy has created a huge legal mess that will last years and cost billions of dollars, and not actually meet their goal. That's terrible governance.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Contrast that with a booming economy, low unemployment, record high consumer confidence and a booming economy.

Trump wins, America wins and the libs continue to b*tch, moan & complain.

M.A.G.A.!!!

Thanks Obama!

You guys and your North Korean fantasies.

Trump claims North Korea has started ‘total denuclearisation’ but officials say there is no evidence

US president claims four missile test sites have already been ‘blown up’

The would be horrible if it were true. But it is a false narrative.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Contrast that with a booming economy, low unemployment, record high consumer confidence and a booming economy.

Trump wins, America wins and the libs continue to b*tch, moan & complain.

M.A.G.A.!!!

Thanks Obama!

You guys and your North Korean fantasies.

Trump claims North Korea has started ‘total denuclearisation’ but officials say there is no evidence

US president claims four missile test sites have already been ‘blown up’

Show me where Obama cut taxes, reduced regulations, proposed a rollback of Dodd-Frank, got NK to halt missile testing, strengthened NK sanctions and brought back manufacturing jobs? You lose.

But...... wrote:

Things that don't wrote:

Not really.

People on the left would always be outraged by policies causing innocent children to be taken from their parents needlessly. And Democrats would always be looking for ways to strengthen the safety net (ala the ACA).

So no, your point does not hold at all.

They weren’t when Obama did the same thing.

Faux outrage.

Dems against the original version of healthcare reform proposed by Pubs long before Obama Care proposed the same thing. Dems against RomneyCare.

Trollimator being for tariffs on China before he was against them. Another.

More and more and more.

Oh, Hi George! Or would you prefer to be called Lying Gary?

But...... wrote:

Dems against the original version of healthcare reform proposed by Pubs long before Obama Care proposed the same thing. Dems against RomneyCare.

The Massachusetts legislature is (and was in 2006 when "Romneycare" passed) overwhelmingly Democrat and it really was they who drove the bill.

The name "Romneycare" was a pejorative originating with Massachusetts Republicans opposed to the bill.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Show me where Obama cut taxes, reduced regulations, proposed a rollback of Dodd-Frank, got NK to halt missile testing, strengthened NK sanctions and brought back manufacturing jobs? You lose.

The BS is strong in this one ^

Don't have time to walk through all of your nonsense. But maybe you can get started by taking a look:

Looks to me like there has been a very steady increase in manufacturing jobs ever since the end of the Great Recession. No discernible difference between early 2010 through 2016 (Obama) and 2017 through early 2018 (Trump).

Monkeys typing wrote:

But...... wrote:

Dems against the original version of healthcare reform proposed by Pubs long before Obama Care proposed the same thing. Dems against RomneyCare.

The Massachusetts legislature is (and was in 2006 when "Romneycare" passed) overwhelmingly Democrat and it really was they who drove the bill.

The name "Romneycare" was a pejorative originating with Massachusetts Republicans opposed to the bill.

"But....." is Lying Gary - still butt hurt over Trump's caving on separating families. And Lying Gary's gotta lie. It's what he does.

///

Come on out, Lying Gary! We miss you! (well, maybe not, but come on out anyway :-)

Not sure if I understand your post.

Are you saying that you are of the delusional Trumpers who think the Republicans will have 60 Senators after this November election?

What's your view on a new immigration reform bill?

Real Man Ufacture wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Show me where Obama cut taxes, reduced regulations, proposed a rollback of Dodd-Frank, got NK to halt missile testing, strengthened NK sanctions and brought back manufacturing jobs? You lose.

The BS is strong in this one ^

Don't have time to walk through all of your nonsense. But maybe you can get started by taking a look:

https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES3000000001

Looks to me like there has been a very steady increase in manufacturing jobs ever since the end of the Great Recession. No discernible difference between early 2010 through 2016 (Obama) and 2017 through early 2018 (Trump).

Looks to me like your showing just a blip in a short timeline. That graph from BLS shows data from 2008-2018. How about you show the massive decrease from 1979 through today. Huh? Try again.

These are the facts:

"Manufacturing jobs peaked in 1979 at 19.4 million, according to the Bureau of Labor statistics, and by 1987 had fallen to 17.6 million. What had been a slow decline in employment accelerated after the turn of the century, and especially during the Great Recession. Manufacturing payrolls bottomed out at fewer than 11.5 million in early 2010, and even though more than 900,000 manufacturing jobs have been added since, overall employment in manufacturing is still at its lowest level since before the U.S. entered World War II."

So know you now disagree with Obama after he said "manufacturing jobs are never coming back."

foo wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

True.

The border issue is a distraction of the real issue...a criminal in the White House.

Mueller is coming (sorry Trumpers, but this is true).

The clown is done.

Hey, Flagpole, let's get this thread moving again...

So, I agree Trump is a despicable law-breaking loser. Also, he's completely inept and has no business managing even a small team in corporate America.

My question to you is do you really think Mueller is going to be able to bring Trump down? I seriously doubt it. Anything Mueller finds will not damage Trump enough to be impeachable. Trump will just plead ignorance and his loyal followers will buy into his lies like they always do.

The best we can do is castrate this a**wipe. The Democrats need to get control of the House in 2018 and make Trump's life miserable for the last 2 years.

Yes...Mueller and/or the Southern District of New York, the DNC, or even Avenatti. One of those will bring him down, and the odds on favorite right now is Mueller. Obstruction of justice will stick. Money laundering will stick. Let's not forget that these are serious crimes with serious jail time associated with them. Don Jr., Manafort, and Kushner will be charged with conspiracy, and it is likely that Trump himself is caught up in that also either with conspiracy or bribery. If he ever talks to Mueller, he will perjure himself. With the Cohen connection he will face bank fraud and wire fraud and/or conspiracy to commit both and campaign finance violation. We also have emoluments clause violation and several other things to which we are not yet privy.

Let's not forget that the DNC has already filed against many in Trump's orbit. He can be brought down by that. Mueller will end up being more thorough, and the charges will be greater in number and consequence.

So, what is Trump facing potentially just from the DNC?

RICO violation

RICO conspiracy

Violation of Wiretap Act

Violation of Uniform Trade Secrets Act

Conspiracy to commit Trespass to chattels

Virginia Computer Crimes Act violation

The RICO stuff is very serious, and one of its purposes is to get those at the head of a criminal organization. The DNC has charged that the organization to elect Trump President (whatever it is called) was a corrupt, criminal organization. RICO was originally created to go after the mob. Punishment for racketeering is up to 20 years in prison.

I believe Mueller will have all that the DNC has charged and then some. I believe his report will be so damning that even a Republican Senate will have to convict after he is impeached by the House...the likely Democrat-controlled House by then.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Real Man Ufacture wrote:

[quote]Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Show me where Obama cut taxes, reduced regulations, proposed a rollback of Dodd-Frank, got NK to halt missile testing, strengthened NK sanctions and brought back manufacturing jobs? You lose.

The BS is strong in this one ^

Don't have time to walk through all of your nonsense. But maybe you can get started by taking a look:

https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES3000000001

Looks to me like there has been a very steady increase in manufacturing jobs ever since the end of the Great Recession. No discernible difference between early 2010 through 2016 (Obama) and 2017 through early 2018 (Trump).

Looks to me like your showing just a blip in a short timeline. That graph from BLS shows data from 2008-2018. How about you show the massive decrease from 1979 through today. Huh? Try again.

These are the facts:

"Manufacturing jobs peaked in 1979 at 19.4 million, according to the Bureau of Labor statistics, and by 1987 had fallen to 17.6 million. What had been a slow decline in employment accelerated after the turn of the century, and especially during the Great Recession. Manufacturing payrolls bottomed out at fewer than 11.5 million in early 2010, and even though more than 900,000 manufacturing jobs have been added since, overall employment in manufacturing is still at its lowest level since before the U.S. entered World War II."

So know you now disagree with Obama after he said "manufacturing jobs are never coming back."

/quote]

American DO NOT want to work in low-paying manufacturing jobs. Who do you think wants those jobs? . . . Hey, I know—immigrants. . . . Maybe you want to force all US citizen minorities to quit "white" jobs and go to work manufacturing things for white enjoyment. The manufacturing slaves need to come from somewhere. Wages must be kept low for manufacturing workers so that whites can lead the good life.

L L wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Haha, what a Liberal Load. Let's see, we have a fake Time magazine cover, a resist hashtag, a leftist run media continuing to use little kids as political pawns in their propaganda "ministry." Contrast that with a booming economy, low unemployment, record high consumer confidence, continuing peace talks with North Korea and a booming economy.

Trump wins, America wins and the libs continue to b*tch, moan & complain.

M.A.G.A.!!!

Not sure if I understand your post.

Are you saying that you are of the delusional Trumpers who think the Republicans will have 60 Senators after this November election?

What's your view on a new immigration reform bill?

Listen to yourself, Liberal Load. Where did I ever say that the Senate was going with a 60 seat majority? We wait until after midterms & allow cooler heads to prevail when it comes to immigration reform- the Dems are at peak TDS right now and will only be in "resist" mode.

Understand this:

Trump will be reelected

Liberal heads will explode for the next 6 1/2 years

The Flagpolian Flop is coming

Mueller never

Clownpole forever