Rigged for Hillary wrote:
agip wrote:
'biased' doesnt' mean that their work was biased. I think that is where we are disagreeing. Professionals separate their personal views from their work. Lawyers do it all the time. Salespeople do it. FBI agents do it.
here, from Wikipedia:
"Messages released in January 2018 showed that Strzok was hesitant to join the Mueller investigation, with Page encouraging him not to.[48]
Strzok's colleagues and a former Trump administration official said that Strzok had never shown any political bias.[4][40] An associate of his says the political parts of the text messages were especially related to Trump's criticism of the FBI's investigation of the Clinton emails.[4] According to FBI guidelines, agents are allowed to have and express political opinions as individuals. Former FBI and DOJ officials told The Hill that it was not uncommon for agents like Strzok to hold political opinions and still conduct an impartial investigation.[49] Several agents asserted that Mueller had removed Strzok to protect the integrity of the special counsel's Russia investigation.[50] Strzok was not punished following his reassignment.[51] Defenders of Strzok and Page in the FBI said no professional misconduct between them occurred.[40]"
When an FBI agent is removed from a task force/field/investigative team & reassigned to HR, that IS punishment. Strozk & Page failed to separate their political views from the investigation and made it very clear where their political loyalties lied. You fail again.
are you trolling me?
the IG made it crystal clear that there is zero evidence that they did not separate their political views from the investigation.
I'm done here - either you are trolling or uninformed.