Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Stand Up People wrote:

I too support Trump ending this TRUMP-era policy.

Thanks

Trump-Era wrote:

Stand Up People wrote:

I too support Trump ending this Obama-era policy.

Thanks

Your welcome.

agip wrote:

In case YOU can't keep up either, today Trump said he will sign an exec order stopping the separations. Of course he was claiming yesterday that the problem was congress not him. Now suddenly he has reversed himself and agreed that the policy that all you defended even up to this morning was a bad one.

I'll assume that all the trumpers will now line up behind trump and agree family separation was bad and had to stop.

Who among you will stand up and say 'hey I think separation was bad and a Trump policy"

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/20/us/politics/trump-immigration-children-executive-order.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=span-ab-top-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Uuuuuh. You don't understand what this is. This isn't a cave on Trump's part. It's lawless, but it isn't a cave in. Trump will still be enforcing the asylum laws and throwing out liars. Catch-and-release won't be happening. So Dems are going to have to put a new spin on it.

agip wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Ok, I'm baaack. It's fine to have political views, dummy. It's not fine when those views are used to steer an investigation to favor a political party. This is where you're wrong. Try again.

oh, agreed absolutely. That's why it's good news that the inspector general found no evidence that political views steered an investigation to favor a political party.

So we are both happy now. Hey, we agree!

Strzok and Page were fired from Mueller's team for their politically motivated views. So, they were biased. You agree?

I'm not saying corporations shouldn't be allowed to make sh*t overseas. I'm saying that when US companies do operate abroad, they should be obligated to meet certain minimum wage and occupational health standards, that these standards should be rigorously enforced, and that their foreign employees should be able to sue them in American court if they or their supply chains violate human rights or fail to maintain safe workplace environments.

It's too late, man. There's no reaching them. But I encourage you to sign on to some of my other lefty liberal policy preferences. 90% tax on all income over $10 million. Federal job guarantee program. 30 hour work weeks. Muahahaha!

Of course, there is no law that needs changing. Trump is doing this all on his own and does not require Congress to pass a law to stop.

Trumpers two years from now: "If you don't want your arm chopped off for petty theft, don't steal!"

Does it feel awkward to support a party full of people who think your sexual orientation is a gross mental illness that makes you unfit to adopt a child?

TRUMP-era wrote:

Obama-era wrote:

Your welcome.

Sure enough

No prob.

Obamer wrote:

TRUMP-era wrote:

Sure enough

No prob.

agip wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Ok, I'm baaack. It's fine to have political views, dummy. It's not fine when those views are used to steer an investigation to favor a political party. This is where you're wrong. Try again.

oh, agreed absolutely. That's why it's good news that the inspector general found no evidence that political views steered an investigation to favor a political party.

So we are both happy now. Hey, we agree!

Remind me why Page and Strzok were taken off the Mueller team? I forgot.

How many agents are being forced to go through bias training again? I forgot.

hah

some trumpist quotes that show you are grasping at straws. This is a surrender by Trump. And good on him for it - he knew separations were bad policy and his fault, and he changed the policy.

“Congress and the courts created this problem, and Congress alone can fix it. Until then, we will enforce every law we have on the books to defend the sovereignty and security of the United States.” — Nielsen

“It's not a policy. Our policy at DHS is to do what we're sworn to do, which is to enforce the law.” — Nielsen

“The only [other] option is to not enforce the law at all.” — Nielsen

“I don't want children taken away from parents. And when you prosecute the parents for coming in illegally, which should happen, you have to take the children away. Now we don't have to prosecute them, but then we're not prosecuting them for coming in illegally.” — Trump

"You can’t do it through an executive order.” -- Trump

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

oh, agreed absolutely. That's why it's good news that the inspector general found no evidence that political views steered an investigation to favor a political party.

So we are both happy now. Hey, we agree!

Strzok and Page were fired from Mueller's team for their politically motivated views. So, they were biased. You agree?

'biased' doesnt' mean that their work was biased. I think that is where we are disagreeing. Professionals separate their personal views from their work. Lawyers do it all the time. Salespeople do it. FBI agents do it.

here, from Wikipedia:

"Messages released in January 2018 showed that Strzok was hesitant to join the Mueller investigation, with Page encouraging him not to.[48]

Strzok's colleagues and a former Trump administration official said that Strzok had never shown any political bias.[4][40] An associate of his says the political parts of the text messages were especially related to Trump's criticism of the FBI's investigation of the Clinton emails.[4] According to FBI guidelines, agents are allowed to have and express political opinions as individuals. Former FBI and DOJ officials told The Hill that it was not uncommon for agents like Strzok to hold political opinions and still conduct an impartial investigation.[49] Several agents asserted that Mueller had removed Strzok to protect the integrity of the special counsel's Russia investigation.[50] Strzok was not punished following his reassignment.[51] Defenders of Strzok and Page in the FBI said no professional misconduct between them occurred.[40]"

Uh-oh. Drudge just posted a link to pictures of Obama's concentration camp for illegal immigrant children.

"Obama kept them in cages. Wrapped them in foil"

Trump will show compassion where Obama did not. Oooooo. I can just feel the Earth shift under my feat on this.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/06/19/photos-obama-immigration-detention-facilities

Obama held more than double the number of illegal immigrant kids in shelters than Trump has now.

Trump ~11,000

Obama ~ 25,000

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-administration-holding-more-immigrant-children-shelters-ever-949099

DiscoGary wrote:

Uh-oh. Drudge just posted a link to pictures of Obama's concentration camp for illegal immigrant children.

"Obama kept them in cages. Wrapped them in foil"

Trump will show compassion where Obama did not. Oooooo. I can just feel the Earth shift under my feat on this.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/06/19/photos-obama-immigration-detention-facilities

Obama held more than double the number of illegal immigrant kids in shelters than Trump has now.

Trump ~11,000

Obama ~ 25,000

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-administration-holding-more-immigrant-children-shelters-ever-949099

Rut-roh Shaggy.

It isn't policy. It's the law, and he has to break the law to stop the separations. He can do that, but it's a bad way to run the country. Still, in the absence of working laws, Trump is enforcing border security, so that part is good.

DiscoGary wrote:

Uh-oh. Drudge just posted a link to pictures of Obama's concentration camp for illegal immigrant children.

"Obama kept them in cages. Wrapped them in foil"

Trump will show compassion where Obama did not. Oooooo. I can just feel the Earth shift under my feat on this.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/06/19/photos-obama-immigration-detention-facilities

Obama held more than double the number of illegal immigrant kids in shelters than Trump has now.

Trump ~11,000

Obama ~ 25,000

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-administration-holding-more-immigrant-children-shelters-ever-949099

Those Obama detention centers look more like gulags.

ok man. Keep getting your news and opinions from right wing sources. I don't care.

Although I'm sorry you like to lie and mislead.

DiscoGary wrote:

It isn't policy. It's the law, and he has to break the law to stop the separations. He can do that, but it's a bad way to run the country. Still, in the absence of working laws, Trump is enforcing border security, so that part is good.

Oh, oh. It looks like Melania is the law breaker. She forced the Orange Clown to stop his heartless separation of kids.

DiscoGary wrote:

It isn't policy. It's the law, and he has to break the law to stop the separations. He can do that, but it's a bad way to run the country. Still, in the absence of working laws, Trump is enforcing border security, so that part is good.

When an FBI agent is removed from a task force/field/investigative team & reassigned to HR, that IS punishment. Strozk & Page failed to separate their political views from the investigation and made it very clear where their political loyalties lied. You fail again.

agip wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Ok, I'm baaack. It's fine to have political views, dummy. It's not fine when those views are used to steer an investigation to favor a political party. This is where you're wrong. Try again.

oh, agreed absolutely. That's why it's good news that the inspector general found no evidence that political views steered an investigation to favor a political party.

So we are both happy now. Hey, we agree!

You can't possibly believe what you type. Do you believe OJ was innocent too?

The IG explicitly stated that there was bias "mindset" from these individuals. He did not deny that yesterday during his testimony. You really think there was no link between their mindset and the fact that Hillary was exonerated before the damn investigation took place? You really think it was proper for the FBI to NOT collect the "hacked server" in question? It's ridiculous.

There are just far too many huge coincidences, misleading actions, flat out lies, resignations, firings, etc. to believe there was no political motivation to protect the establishment.

Oh, and the nation is still waiting on a single indictment of an American for actions related to collluuuuusion.