welp
looks like the markets are sh*tting the bed today
thanks for that, donald dump and president musk
-
71
-
you keep thinking we'll forget wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
No it hasn't.
The NASDAQ is up 9% in the last 12 months.
A year ago today the NASDAQ was at 16,000. Today it's opening at 17,468.
What about QQQ though?
There's 3600 stocks on the NASDAQ... The QQQ and the NASDAQ are not the same thing no matter how many people here tell you otherwise.
28 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
you keep thinking we'll forget wrote:
What about QQQ though?
There's 3600 stocks on the NASDAQ... The QQQ and the NASDAQ are not the same thing no matter how many people here tell you otherwise.
Sure, but you said "QQQ is greatly outperforming the NASDAQ 100" did you not?
41 -
you keep thinking we'll forget wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
There's 3600 stocks on the NASDAQ... The QQQ and the NASDAQ are not the same thing no matter how many people here tell you otherwise.
Sure, but you said "QQQ is greatly outperforming the NASDAQ 100" did you not?
If I did it was a mistake. The discussion was about funds that outperform the composite indexes.
As always you people miss the actual point...
29 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
you keep thinking we'll forget wrote:
Sure, but you said "QQQ is greatly outperforming the NASDAQ 100" did you not?
If I did it was a mistake. The discussion was about funds that outperform the composite indexes.
As always you people miss the actual point...
Yeah, you missed it b/c you're wrong
120 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
marketperson wrote:
So what was Ronnie's "real job" that he held before he became an elected official?
He was in the military and he was an actor.
Both professions are more useful than career politician.
Kamala became a politician in 2002 when elected as DA. She was a civil servant before that.
So while she dedicated her life to civil service before assuming elected office, you think a more viable career path would be to play a cowboy on TV?
Do you actually listen to yourself? It's really insane.
103 -
Even higher tariffs threatened against Canada now.
This should be great for the stock markets.
The fun is only beginning...
61 -
marketperson wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
If I did it was a mistake. The discussion was about funds that outperform the composite indexes.
As always you people miss the actual point...
Yeah, you missed it b/c you're wrong
If you want to pretend the QQQ funds mimic the nasdaq composite and not the nasdaq 100 and that these things have identical returns you go right ahead.
17 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
marketperson wrote:
Yeah, you missed it b/c you're wrong
If you want to pretend the QQQ funds mimic the nasdaq composite and not the nasdaq 100 and that these things have identical returns you go right ahead.
Go back and read the posts - i'll get them for you. I said QQQ is a passive Nasdaq 100 tracker and you said it wasn't!
100 -
marketperson wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
The QQQM mimics the index with 90% of its funds allocated as they're weighted in the NASDAQ 100. The QQQ Trust weights the stocks from the index how they see fit and doesn't mimic the index.
Again you're demonstrating that you don't know what you're talking about.
Passive nasdaq100 tracker. You are just wrong. Simply and plainly wrong.
see
70 -
marketperson wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
He was in the military and he was an actor.
Both professions are more useful than career politician.
Kamala became a politician in 2002 when elected as DA. She was a civil servant before that.
So while she dedicated her life to civil service before assuming elected office, you think a more viable career path would be to play a cowboy on TV?
Do you actually listen to yourself? It's really insane.
"dedicated her life to civil service"
LOL!
If you think an incompetent assistant DA is more valuable to society than a successful actor you're even dumber than I thought.
Movies put money into the economy and make people happy.
Useless "civil servants" like Kamala Harris take money out of the economy and serve no purpose.
112 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
marketperson wrote:
QQQ is a passive index fund. Tracks the nasdaq 100 INDEX.
I think you're looking at QQQM. QQQ is different.
see
60 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
marketperson wrote:
Kamala became a politician in 2002 when elected as DA. She was a civil servant before that.
So while she dedicated her life to civil service before assuming elected office, you think a more viable career path would be to play a cowboy on TV?
Do you actually listen to yourself? It's really insane.
"dedicated her life to civil service"
LOL!
If you think an incompetent assistant DA is more valuable to society than a successful actor you're even dumber than I thought.
Movies put money into the economy and make people happy.
Useless "civil servants" like Kamala Harris take money out of the economy and serve no purpose.
So governments shouldn't prosecute criminals?
50 -
marketperson wrote:
marketperson wrote:
Passive nasdaq100 tracker. You are just wrong. Simply and plainly wrong.
see
The NASDAQ 100 and the NASDAQ Composite are not the same thing...
06 -
marketperson wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
"dedicated her life to civil service"
LOL!
If you think an incompetent assistant DA is more valuable to society than a successful actor you're even dumber than I thought.
Movies put money into the economy and make people happy.
Useless "civil servants" like Kamala Harris take money out of the economy and serve no purpose.
So governments shouldn't prosecute criminals?
If you'd been paying attention you'd have noticed that these liberal DAs don't prosecute criminals.
Harris spent her tenure as DA abusing minorities for drug use she laughed and bragged about participating in herself on the Breakfast Club.
28 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
marketperson wrote:
Kamala became a politician in 2002 when elected as DA. She was a civil servant before that.
So while she dedicated her life to civil service before assuming elected office, you think a more viable career path would be to play a cowboy on TV?
Do you actually listen to yourself? It's really insane.
"dedicated her life to civil service"
LOL!
If you think an incompetent assistant DA is more valuable to society than a successful actor you're even dumber than I thought.
Movies put money into the economy and make people happy.
Useless "civil servants" like Kamala Harris take money out of the economy and serve no purpose.
it's just so Trumpian to be all BACK THE BLUE and CRIME NEEDS TO BE PROSECUTED
...and then say a Federal Prosecutor 'serves no purpose'
moran
120 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
marketperson wrote:
Kamala became a politician in 2002 when elected as DA. She was a civil servant before that.
So while she dedicated her life to civil service before assuming elected office, you think a more viable career path would be to play a cowboy on TV?
Do you actually listen to yourself? It's really insane.
Movies put money into the economy and make people happy.
So the world should be run by actors? Or just anyone that makes people happy? Like clowns, say? Should clowns run the government? Or stand-up comics?
Where do movies get money to put in the economy?
80 -
Markets cratering. Trumpers talking about Kamala (??).
73 -
10% from peak now. Brutal. One of the fastest sell offs in history.
101 -
80
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.