Wavelights have existed since the '70's - but you obviously don't know that. However, they have only played a part in world records in the last 5 years. You don't know that either.
Decades are not written in the way you do.
You could just give an exsmple where wavelights were used in the "'70's" - but you will not.
You have wrongly claimed a few WRs back in the day were set with wavelights. You are wrong - as so often.
I didn't claim records were set with wavelights back in the day; I said wavelights were introduced then, and Ryun was aware of them. As we have seen in the last week, they aren't necessary to achieving record performances.
BTW, you still don't know the differences between American and UK English. But that's ok. You are not a worldly person.
A m**** is capable of posting 50 times a day. As you show.
I don't "show", because I don't post 50 times a day like you do. I actually have a life. Unlike you.
Since you claim you're "intelligent enough to post 50 times a day" you fail your own measure of intelligence, since you say you don't post that much. Apparently not intelligent enough after all.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
Al Jazeera did say that it obtained the estimate from talking with those involved in the sport, including antidoping. But what does a "black market in banned peds that is estimated to be over a billion Euros" not "represent" to you? Just a few steroid users at your local gym? T and F, which obviously includes running, is grouped by WADA as amongst the worst doping offenders. Do you seriously think runners don't have the same ambitions and competitive attitudes as other athletes? You show again how clueless you are about sport. I don't think you have ever competed - you just follow it like your private porn on the internet; a source of unrealistic fantasies.
You need to rewatch the documentary to get your facts in order. Al Jazeera did not say "banned peds" -- that is you putting your own words in quotes.
In any case, you are so predictable, I already answered your question above: "This worldwide estimate surely covers major non-WADA sports, like American football, basketball, and baseball; worldwide sports and WADA sports, like soccer, weightlifting, bodybuilding, tennis, swimming, and cycling; athletic events like sprinting and throws and jumps; and non-sports and non-elite athletes, like health clubs, anti-aging clinics, local gyms, and high schools; and is not restricted to substances WADA puts on its banned lists. It may also include animals, like horses in racing, or animal shows, or agriculture, and medicines for third world countries procuring cheaper unauthorized generic versions of patented medicines."
Distance runners may have the same ambitions and attitudes, but the point is that you don't have any data relevant to the specific athletes in question, whether it is Shelby, or Kenyans, or just generically "sport". Your "billion Euros", when we exclude all these other non-WADA sports with more money and less testing, and all these non-athletics sports, and non-distance events, your "estimate" becomes some tiny fraction much less impressive to those able to put things in proper perspective.
More mere waffle. Huge amounts spent on doping world-wide but you can't find any evidence of it in distance running. As I said - completely clueless.
More mere waffle. Huge amounts spent on doping world-wide but you can't find any evidence of it in distance running. As I said - completely clueless.
Apparently you are the one who "can't find any evidence of it" -- after all, it is your claim, not mine.
"Waffle" is your telltale sign that you are unable to support your baseless claims intellectually, with arguments based on real data.
Questions you fail to answer: Who is spending how much money, and on what? To whom did Al Jazeera attribute the "billion Euros black market" estimate, and for which sports and events and drugs? Is "elite distance running" average, below average, or above average?
You could just give an exsmple where wavelights were used in the "'70's" - but you will not.
You have wrongly claimed a few WRs back in the day were set with wavelights. You are wrong - as so often.
I didn't claim records were set with wavelights back in the day; I said wavelights were introduced then, and Ryun was aware of them. As we have seen in the last week, they aren't necessary to achieving record performances.
BTW, you still don't know the differences between American and UK English. But that's ok. You are not a worldly person.
Armstronglivs: "But they have been available since the '70's, yet most wr's have been set without them."
Still waiting for an example of wavelights in the 1970s. And in the 1980s. And in the 1990s. And in the 2000s.
Decades are not written the way you do. Not in the UK and not in US.
I don't "show", because I don't post 50 times a day like you do. I actually have a life. Unlike you.
Since you claim you're "intelligent enough to post 50 times a day" you fail your own measure of intelligence, since you say you don't post that much. Apparently not intelligent enough after all.
You can't read. You're not intelligent enough for that.
If you want the real plausible answer, theoretically a person could use substances which are contaminated during manufacturing. Shelby could have been on testosterone replacement from her doctor, or might have PCOS, maybe some other kind of doctor prescribed thing.
perhaps the source of contamination is truly unknown, and the burrito was the most plausible option.
there are all kinds of ways this could have gone.
Nando is a psychologically-taxing drug to run for many people, but it does have the benefit of improving soft tissue recovery.
weighing its lengthy detectability window and potential issues with mood and sleep, I doubt she would have meant to use it, unless it was a microdose routine miscalculated
Would 1 or 2mg per month make sense? That would assume that somebody at USADA was giving her advanced notice of when the tests would be because she was tested in all 4 quarters of 2020.