Democrats are stupid, that goes double for Flagpole.
I don't know. Quoting Chris Rock isn't high IQ move either.
Things around the nation are in a tense mode right now, waiting to see what erupts from the Trump bust. It's getting kind of like that white Bronco chase a few years back, except the roles are reversed. Liberals wanted OJ to get away back in the 90s, but now they want Trump busted in the 2020s. Trump supporters wanted OJ busted, but want Trump to be allowed to live in peace inside the Trump compound.
it is pretty amusing that the right wing has chosen this as their position:
It is imperative that we all condemn this unjust political prosecution because the country is on in thin ice and we should be uniting instead of dividing the country.
Notice that no Republican is making any type of case for Trump's innocence whatsoever. Instead they are pretending that they are a party that somehow found a mission of uniting the country.
You can't make this up.
They've been on that same basic tack for years, though. When the Russia investigation was going on they would always fall back on, "okay, say it's all true, you can't indict a sitting POTUS though!" Anyone who thought they wouldn't edit that to "you shouldn't indict a former POTUS" when convenient for future criminal jeopardy is very naïve.
it is pretty amusing that the right wing has chosen this as their position:
It is imperative that we all condemn this unjust political prosecution because the country is on in thin ice and we should be uniting instead of dividing the country.
Notice that no Republican is making any type of case for Trump's innocence whatsoever. Instead they are pretending that they are a party that somehow found a mission of uniting the country.
You can't make this up.
They've been on that same basic tack for years, though. When the Russia investigation was going on they would always fall back on, "okay, say it's all true, you can't indict a sitting POTUS though!" Anyone who thought they wouldn't edit that to "you shouldn't indict a former POTUS" when convenient for future criminal jeopardy is very naïve.
It's 2023 and you still have no idea the Russia investigation was 100% bs...
They've been on that same basic tack for years, though. When the Russia investigation was going on they would always fall back on, "okay, say it's all true, you can't indict a sitting POTUS though!" Anyone who thought they wouldn't edit that to "you shouldn't indict a former POTUS" when convenient for future criminal jeopardy is very naïve.
It's 2023 and you still have no idea the Russia investigation was 100% bs...
It's 2023 and the Dunning Kruger in the room is still making 100% confident assertions with no real idea of what's true.
Rule of Law. No kings. It surely looks like Trump broke the law before/during/after being president. To ensure that we have a well-run country we must not allow presidents to break laws. That means holding them accountable at some point. For Trump that point is coming soon. Will first indictment drop tomorrow? Is Trump the only source for that? If so, why believe him?
Rule of Law. No kings. It surely looks like Trump broke the law before/during/after being president. To ensure that we have a well-run country we must not allow presidents to break laws. That means holding them accountable at some point. For Trump that point is coming soon. Will first indictment drop tomorrow? Is Trump the only source for that? If so, why believe him?
Alvin Bragg's campaign theme was going after Trump. The case he's bringing was previously dropped by everyone because it's absurd.
Biden broke the law before/during/after being president. Why doesn't this bother you?
So what happens if DJT is not arrested? Indicted - very possible. They wouldn't really need to arrest him. It's not like he is hard to miss, or avoiding attention.
Redstate.com? You are polluting your mind. You would be better sticking to Fox as a better source and everyone knows how they just got exposed for purposeful lying.
Sure journalists have their own opinions. But are you morphing this into the thread discussing how Fox intentionally spread known lies, and will be paying a huge penalty for that?
The MSM is horrible and you're all sheep (standard lame projection) for EVER listening to them.
BUT, when they say something I like, they're not so bad.
Seen daily on this site. And adult specializes in it. And no, the "broken clock" expression doesn't let you off the hook.
And calls other morons. As he would say, "hilarious." Or something about lacking "self-awareness."
I'm aware that CNN and Fox BOTH have bias.
You think only Fox has bias because you disagree with them.
That is why you lack self awareness.
DF, keep up with current, and not-so-current, events. Fox purposefully lies to their viewers every day. For years. AND mocks viewers like you behind the scenes.
"Bias" and "lying" are not the same word. Google them.
You WANT to believe that, say, Anderson Cooper is the same. Except he's not.
Guess what? Lots of people with conservative views have been watching/reading left-biased news for years or decades. And the well-educated ones were taught by a bunch of liberal professors. But they're smart enough to filter. They're not even close to "brain-washed."
Note that you are NOT in that group. Not nearly smart or good enough to be.
2) Hillary Clinton has done nothing to be in danger of being put in prison for. Shame on you, Rojo. I suppose you are allowed to be wrong, but dude, you're totally wrong here...not even a snowball's chance in hell that she has done something you are aware of that she needs to go to prison for...or ever will. Her server? That's been settled. Trump and his idiot children did the same thing (with phones, not a computer), and that's so far down the list of their criminal behavior that no one even talks about it.....
This bears repeating. "Shame on you, Rojo."
If this is the sum total of your grasp of important constitutional issues, I implore you to shut the hell up.
You are obviously in over your head.
Or you have ulterior motives, like trying to diminish the seriousness of Trumps wrongdoing by comparing it to something done by the other side that has already been aired and cleared and found not to be worthy of charges.
You think only Fox has bias because you disagree with them.
That is why you lack self awareness.
DF, keep up with current, and not-so-current, events. Fox purposefully lies to their viewers every day. For years. AND mocks viewers like you behind the scenes.
"Bias" and "lying" are not the same word. Google them.
You WANT to believe that, say, Anderson Cooper is the same. Except he's not.
Guess what? Lots of people with conservative views have been watching/reading left-biased news for years or decades. And the well-educated ones were taught by a bunch of liberal professors. But they're smart enough to filter. They're not even close to "brain-washed."
Note that you are NOT in that group. Not nearly smart or good enough to be.
You're so indoctrinated you can't even recognize your own bias...
CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo, and every other liberal outlet knew the Hunter Biden laptop story was legit and they lied about it for 2 years.
Fox has NEWS and it has OPINION shows. The opinion hosts admit their bias.
2) Hillary Clinton has done nothing to be in danger of being put in prison for. Shame on you, Rojo. I suppose you are allowed to be wrong, but dude, you're totally wrong here...not even a snowball's chance in hell that she has done something you are aware of that she needs to go to prison for...or ever will. Her server? That's been settled. Trump and his idiot children did the same thing (with phones, not a computer), and that's so far down the list of their criminal behavior that no one even talks about it.....
This bears repeating. "Shame on you, Rojo."
If this is the sum total of your grasp of important constitutional issues, I implore you to shut the hell up.
You are obviously in over your head.
Or you have ulterior motives, like trying to diminish the seriousness of Trumps wrongdoing by comparing it to something done by the other side that has already been aired and cleared and found not to be worthy of charges.
She mishandled classified material and then destroyed evidence while under subpoena. She also lied about it under oath.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.