fermin cacho wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
Is it SH that was charged ?
That question doesn't compute. How is that matinee K-hole treating you?
As you won’t read the decision I am not surprised you don’t understand the question.
Come back and post after you have read about the subject matter.
say it again. wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
Every single phrase shows you are an uneducated bigot.
But everything he said is correct,twist whatever you want but the running world knows she is a cheat.
Wada had nowt to do with it. But then people post without knowing what they talk about.
original liar soorer wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Broadly I would use it for any knowing use of substances to enhance performance which could have adverse health effects.(quote)
If there are objectively strong grounds for believing that a substance can enhance performance while having adverse health effects it will be placed on the prohibited list. If this hasn't been shown it won't be put on the list and is therefore not considered doping. If it isn't on the list it doesn't have those effects you describe. You won't know anything WADA doesn't.
Again you seek to re invent what I have said.
And then you conclude with yet another tautology.
You must be wearing blinkers if you cant think of substances that enhance performance but have potential adverse health effects. Can’t think of painkillers and anti inflabs those don’t have such health probs and serious heart ones at that.
Wada know this but create an arbitrary banned list.
So you know better than WADA. And you're a rocket scientist, too, no doubt. The only way you would know what WADA doesn't is that you're involved in the practice of doping. If you aren't, you are talking out of your a*se, as usual.
Armstronglivs wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
Again you seek to re invent what I have said.
And then you conclude with yet another tautology.
You must be wearing blinkers if you cant think of substances that enhance performance but have potential adverse health effects. Can’t think of painkillers and anti inflabs those don’t have such health probs and serious heart ones at that.
Wada know this but create an arbitrary banned list.
So you know better than WADA. And you're a rocket scientist, too, no doubt. The only way you would know what WADA doesn't is that you're involved in the practice of doping. If you aren't, you are talking out of your a*se, as usual.
More constructive debate and insults.
I repeat ; it is not knowing more than WADA but recognising, as WADA do, that the banned list could easily be half or double the size.
When will you re start saying that my intelligence is linked to my race.
original liar soorer wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
So you know better than WADA. And you're a rocket scientist, too, no doubt. The only way you would know what WADA doesn't is that you're involved in the practice of doping. If you aren't, you are talking out of your a*se, as usual.
More constructive debate and insults.
I repeat ; it is not knowing more than WADA but recognising, as WADA do, that the banned list could easily be half or double the size.
When will you re start saying that my intelligence is linked to my race.
Why aren’t Cox 2 inhibitors on the banned list?
You dip sh!ts ever realize she’s probably just doing this to fvck with y’all? Keep it coming Shelbo! We love you!
original liar soorer wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
So you know better than WADA. And you're a rocket scientist, too, no doubt. The only way you would know what WADA doesn't is that you're involved in the practice of doping. If you aren't, you are talking out of your a*se, as usual.
More constructive debate and insults.
I repeat ; it is not knowing more than WADA but recognising, as WADA do, that the banned list could easily be half or double the size.
When will you re start saying that my intelligence is linked to my race.
Intelligence is not a word I would use in relation to you.
Since you know of substances that enhance performance while damaging health that aren't banned perhaps you could give an example. What is the substance, who uses it, how does it harm health and why doesn't anti-doping know of its existence but you do?
I don't agree with rekrunner on doping issues but his posts have intellectual content (although I find his "data" selective and he has an over-reliance on semantic distinctions). However liar soorer posts are devoid of intellectual content and add nothing to any meaningful discussion. He may as well be breaking wind.
Armstronglivs wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
More constructive debate and insults.
I repeat ; it is not knowing more than WADA but recognising, as WADA do, that the banned list could easily be half or double the size.
When will you re start saying that my intelligence is linked to my race.
Intelligence is not a word I would use in relation to you.
Since you know of substances that enhance performance while damaging health that aren't banned perhaps you could give an example. What is the substance, who uses it, how does it harm health and why doesn't anti-doping know of its existence but you do?
Cox 2 inhibitors , aspirin, anti coagulants , volterol .
All counter indications and research is easily available.
Wada will know but it will make drug control and TUE’s impossible to work for the billions who are subjected to Wada controls.
But you did relate your view of my intelligence to my race.
Ps, bothered to read the rules yet?
You replying to yourself now,sign of a lunatic 🤣
say it again. wrote:
You replying to yourself now,sign of a lunatic 🤣
Wrong , it was a ps. to the previous one.
Now apologise!
Re painkillers viewed as enhancers.
original liar soorer wrote:
https://www.sportsperformancebulletin.com/endurance-injuries-and-health/endurance-health-and-lifestyle/painkiller-use-sport-junkie-athlete/Re painkillers viewed as enhancers.
That's because they are.
Anyway she's banned and a cheat,unlucky cry baby.
original liar soorer wrote:
say it again. wrote:
You replying to yourself now,sign of a lunatic 🤣
Wrong , it was a ps. to the previous one.
Now apologise!
No thanks lunatic, you replied to yourself.
say it again. wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
https://www.sportsperformancebulletin.com/endurance-injuries-and-health/endurance-health-and-lifestyle/painkiller-use-sport-junkie-athlete/Re painkillers viewed as enhancers.
That's because they are.
Anyway she's banned and a cheat,unlucky cry baby.
They aren’t . Read the rules.
Serious question: now that she's already banned for doping, is she no longer in the testing pool?
say it again. wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
Wrong , it was a ps. to the previous one.
Now apologise!
No thanks lunatic, you replied to yourself.
Does your lack of education really stretch to not understanding what “ps” refers to.
Collin wrote:
Serious question: now that she's already banned for doping, is she no longer in the testing pool?
Should be in the testing pool unless she says she has retired which seems not the case.
She's banned and a cheat,no need to test a cheat.