Repeated comments wrote:
There are a lot of comments made on this thread that find their way over to URC. They do not like LRC at all. They do seem to be making a lot of troll posts here.
That much seems obvious.
Repeated comments wrote:
There are a lot of comments made on this thread that find their way over to URC. They do not like LRC at all. They do seem to be making a lot of troll posts here.
That much seems obvious.
Scam_Watcheroo wrote:
Results wrote:Scam_Watcheroo if you had to put a number on it, what is your estimate of the percentage likelihood that cheating has occurred? How certain are you?
I would put that number at about 80% based on what was seen with the Race Drone, videos, and all the other pieces. It is not 100% due to people vouching for Mimi and also because Asher himself did not see anything at today's check. It would be one wild explanation from Mimi and her team to convincingly explain everything in a way that makes sense.
The extreme lack of transparency and completely ignoring my messages by Mimi's team to request video to help resolve this issue if they are innocent does not inspire much confidence.
Can you (or someone else) please document the things that don't add up.
So far all I've heard is because she doesn't appear fit.
Ultrarunning Judge wrote:
So far all I've heard is ...
Is this the URC troll, again?
part way across wrote:
Scam_Watcheroo wrote:I would put that number at about 80% based on what was seen with the Race Drone, videos, and all the other pieces. It is not 100% due to people vouching for Mimi and also because Asher himself did not see anything at today's check.
What do you think about the possibility that she can run the 1500 miles from KS to NYC and will "prove" it, but from LA to KS there was some taking advantage? This is the problem with not having good data for the first half -- it cannot be fixed.
That could be a plausibility since it could explain much of what we see in a way that fits things together.
URC judge wrote:
Ultrarunning Judge wrote:So far all I've heard is ...
Is this the URC troll, again?
No. I only post here. I just want a summary.
Ultrarunning Judge wrote:
URC judge wrote:Is this the URC troll, again?
No. I only post here. I just want a summary.
You can read the thread. It's easy if you try.
Scam_Watcheroo wrote:
Results wrote:Scam_Watcheroo if you had to put a number on it, what is your estimate of the percentage likelihood that cheating has occurred? How certain are you?
I would put that number at about 80% based on what was seen with the Race Drone, videos, and all the other pieces. It is not 100% due to people vouching for Mimi and also because Asher himself did not see anything at today's check. It would be one wild explanation from Mimi and her team to convincingly explain everything in a way that makes sense.
The extreme lack of transparency and completely ignoring my messages by Mimi's team to request video to help resolve this issue if they are innocent does not inspire much confidence.
Thanks. I would put myself at around 65% confident that they are not cheating. The last couple of days have pushed me from being a non-believer to a believer (but I still have doubts obviously).
I don't know how much to make of Asher's report. It's great he checked on her but I would feel a lot better if someone had run 20 or even only 10 miles with her during the day. Her times just don't match up with what we've seen on video.
URC Judge wrote:
Ultrarunning Judge wrote:No. I only post here. I just want a summary.
You can read the thread. It's easy if you try.
He was trolling the Treadmill Amy thread and now he's here looking for more attention.
Results wrote:
Her times just don't match up with what we've seen on video.
The video pace is way low. That matches up with her needing help into the RV. The Garmin and Strava paces, not so much.
URC Judge wrote:
Ultrarunning Judge wrote:No. I only post here. I just want a summary.
You can read the thread. It's easy if you try.
It's 145 pages. Some of us have things to do
Results wrote:
URC Judge wrote:You can read the thread. It's easy if you try.
He was trolling the Treadmill Amy thread and now he's here looking for more attention.
There are LRC trolls who play both sides of an argument to gain attention to themselves. They giggle when they make a post from their mom's basement.
Another LRC troll wrote:
Results wrote:He was trolling the Treadmill Amy thread and now he's here looking for more attention.
There are LRC trolls who play both sides of an argument to gain attention to themselves. They giggle when they make a post from their mom's basement.
All I've asked for is a summary because the thread is 145 pages long FFS.
Ultrarunning Judge wrote:
Another LRC troll wrote:There are LRC trolls who play both sides of an argument to gain attention to themselves. They giggle when they make a post from their mom's basement.
All I've asked for is a summary because the thread is 145 pages long FFS.
Rojo came in and asked for a summary over the weekend I think. I would start back about 20-30 pages and then catch up to the present. I have a summary in there somewhere but things have changed in recent days. It has been interesting and it's worth the read. Just skip over the obvious troll talking to himself. That's probably combined a good 5 pages worth of nonsense you can scroll by.
Results wrote:
Rojo came in and asked for a summary over the weekend I think. I would start back about 20-30 pages and then catch up to the present. I have a summary in there somewhere but things have changed in recent days. It has been interesting and it's worth the read. Just skip over the obvious troll talking to himself. That's probably combined a good 5 pages worth of nonsense you can scroll by.
I think that's what I came in to, and discouraged me reading more. This is the least coherent of these type of threads.
Ultrarunning Judge wrote:
I think that's what I came in to, and discouraged me reading more. This is the least coherent of these type of threads.
What kind of athletics judge doesn't watch the event they are judging?
This is interesting and has a parallel to the video's of Mimi. There was a comment made by someone who outed Instagram's #1 superstar as not what they appeared to be because of the selective videos they posted.
The superstar is a super macho gun nut. He was in Las Vegas at the concert of this week's mass murder event. Well, it seems he is not the superman he claims to be. He ran and ducked for cover, while lesser mortals stood their ground and carried the wounded to safety.
dakotameyer0317This is why children shouldn't classify heroes by their followers or their photos. @danbilzerian this is what kills me about people like you. Always playing "operator dress up" and so so tough when the cameras are on. A woman just got shot in the head and you are running away filming that's not what operators do. Please stop trying to be someone your not. People are dying, you're running away not helping them and pretending it's worthy of a video is disgusting.
Ultrarunning Judge wrote:
I think that's what I came in to, and discouraged me reading more. This is the least coherent of these type of threads.
I think most of what you need to know is that at the start of this thread we thought Mimi Anderson's run was going to be legit and transparent like with Pete's transcon but then we found out that Mimi and her team demonstrably lied about them turning off/not charging their live GPS trackers over the first 2 weeks which resulted in them and URC throwing Richard from Race Drone under the bus while I defended him based on my own sleuthing.
The videos on Tim Anderson's Facebook page show that Mimi has great difficulty even going up or down a few RV stairs, sometimes requiring another person to assist her. So it makes the very reasonable question of how she was able to go up and down all those mountain roads with such high mileage.
Mimi and her team claimed they get the police to arrest one of the LRC members, which was shown to be another lie.
Some prominent people have posted in support of Mimi on here but have only based it on their personal opinions of her and there has been no supporting evidence provided.
I showed that I can convincingly spoof Strava data because Mimi and her team as well as URC says only the Strava data matters.
Asher honored this thread by going out to check on Mimi today but did not see anything unusual.
This thread is about both Sandra Vi's and Mimi Anderson's transcon runs. There is no suspicions about Sandra Vi.
So now we are I'm trying to get Mimi's team to actually answer my messages about getting non stop videos of some runs, which would give them a chance to prove their innocence. But her team never responds to any of my messages.
Scam_Watcheroo wrote:
So now we are I'm trying to get Mimi's team to actually answer my messages about getting non stop videos of some runs, which would give them a chance to prove their innocence. But her team never responds to any of my messages.
It is obvious that Mimi's team has read, and will continue to read, this thread. They have made corrections for some of the errors that have been pointed out to them.
The reason there is less suspicion with Sandy Vi--the amateur--is that her data is top-notch, and it has been real-time for the start. And Mimi--the highly experienced professional UK runner--still has not been able to match the same data level.
Reading LRC wrote:
Scam_Watcheroo wrote:So now we are I'm trying to get Mimi's team to actually answer my messages about getting non stop videos of some runs, which would give them a chance to prove their innocence. But her team never responds to any of my messages.
It is obvious that Mimi's team has read, and will continue to read, this thread. They have made corrections for some of the errors that have been pointed out to them.
The reason there is less suspicion with Sandy Vi--the amateur--is that her data is top-notch, and it has been real-time for the start. And Mimi--the highly experienced professional UK runner--still has not been able to match the same data level.
Marina also joked about having body doubles in one of the videos I posted earlier today. I assume she got that from this thread. There have been a few fans of hers who have tried to discredit us through impersonation. One of the sillier accusations was that she had a team of body doubles doing the running for her. It's strange how her supporters are so determined to disrupt our conversation.