And what it is is true. I would bet anything on it. Care to challenge me?
-
110
-
Noyankee wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
If you think, even for a second, that Trump and Musk agreed to engage in this as "4D chess" to benefit both of them, there is absolutely no helping you.
I didn’t say I think that, I said it’s a possibility but more likely he’s a wounded soldier. I don’t need nor am looking for help Chief. I guarantee that I am the only person you will ever have the privilege to chat with that actually has a real connection to a main player in this saga. If that hurts you so be it. it is what it is.
LOL
You literally wrote, "I think either..." which means that you think that both things that follow those words are possible.
So, you think it is possible that this fight is "4D chess," which is laughable, "Chief."
120 -
Cowboy Corkyyyyyyyyyyyy wrote:
This could be a very nasty divorce but Trump has all the power. He could really put a big hurt on TSLA and Musk.
Correct!
211 -
Noyankee wrote:
And what it is is true. I would bet anything on it. Care to challenge me?
I’ve also clearly said earlier that it’s also a possibility that Trump was involved. Anything is possible but from my insight, it seems unlikely. My friend would have no reason to hide that unless she was under NDA in her settlement. Possible, but I don’t see it as likely, we see.
010 -
Noyankee wrote:
And what it is is true. I would bet anything on it. Care to challenge me?
Is that suppose to be English?
91 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Cowboy Corkyyyyyyyyyyyy wrote:
This could be a very nasty divorce but Trump has all the power. He could really put a big hurt on TSLA and Musk.
Correct!
Musk is finished either way, unless Trump rescues him. One thing, if the smart people in the World have not understood by now, is that MAGA loves the second amendment and MAGA hates backstabbers. Right or wrong, Musk is done. Or the libs support him because they have no moral compass.
113 -
"President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him." - JD Vance
213 -
RossiCheated wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
I didn’t say I think that, I said it’s a possibility but more likely he’s a wounded soldier. I don’t need nor am looking for help Chief. I guarantee that I am the only person you will ever have the privilege to chat with that actually has a real connection to a main player in this saga. If that hurts you so be it. it is what it is.
LOL
You literally wrote, "I think either..." which means that you think that both things that follow those words are possible.
So, you think it is possible that this fight is "4D chess," which is laughable, "Chief."
Agreed, both are possible. Probable is a different word with different meaning. You should look it up. I’m not God, nor try to act like the almighty. There is nothing that would surprise me. I also said it’s most likely Musk is a wounded soldier, or just bat shlt crazy on drugs like you libs USED to think. Remember that way back like yesterday??
012 -
Noyankee wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
Trump floated cutting the contracts with Musk's companies (which the law does not allow if it is in bad faith, but regardless...)...
So, will Trump really try to follow through on this, or will President Taco chicken out, like always?
I’ve said this a few times before, but most likely those will not take me seriously, but that would be their downfall, for I am.
I know one of the Epstein girls very well. She is a client of mine, and a prominent one in his circle.
She has not one time mentioned any interactions with Trump, not being at Mar a Lago or even meeting him…so that’s seems a bit odd to me. in fact she years ago told me that she had never met Trump, this soon after she received a large payout from Epstein.
So, I think either Musk is a wounded soldier, or this is he and Trump playing 4D chess.
Take it for what it’s worth, but its fact.
Your story isn't making sense so far, Spuds.
First, it would be very odd/strange for a purported lawyer for one of Epstein's female victims to refer to his client as "one of the Epstein girls." Thus, we are skeptical of your account.
Second, if you represented "one of the Epstein girls" in a lawsuit against Epstein or his estate, you'd know whether or not she had a NDA (mentioned in your subsequent post) and you'd know its terms. On the other hand, if you did not represent "one of the Epstein girls" in a lawsuit against Epstein or his estate, but you represented her in some other matter, then it's not "odd" in the slightest that she did not discuss Trump -- that would be something she would only mention to her lawyer in the Epstein litigation, and she would be instructed not to tell anyone else. Surely you realize that as her purported lawyer.
Third, contrary to your assertion in a subsequent post ("Possible, but I don't see it as likely"), it would be very likely that anyone settling a lawsuit against Epstein or his estate would have executed a NDA as part of that settlement. She's not going to violate her NDA by telling you stuff you don't need to know. Surely you realize that as a purported lawyer.
Fourth, it's just illogical for anyone to draw conclusions about anything from what someone else did NOT say to them. You could speculate anything on god's green Erf from what you are not told by acquaintances. Jesus Christ, man. Think much?
GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY
111 -
maga2024 wrote:
TrumpWon | wrote:
Tesla up 5.19% today.
Is Tesla update?
Fantastic trolling 😂👏🏼
81 -
El Runkin wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
I’ve said this a few times before, but most likely those will not take me seriously, but that would be their downfall, for I am.
I know one of the Epstein girls very well. She is a client of mine, and a prominent one in his circle.
She has not one time mentioned any interactions with Trump, not being at Mar a Lago or even meeting him…so that’s seems a bit odd to me. in fact she years ago told me that she had never met Trump, this soon after she received a large payout from Epstein.
So, I think either Musk is a wounded soldier, or this is he and Trump playing 4D chess.
Take it for what it’s worth, but its fact.
Your story isn't making sense so far, Spuds.
First, it would be very odd/strange for a purported lawyer for one of Epstein's female victims to refer to his client as "one of the Epstein girls." Thus, we are skeptical of your account.
Second, if you represented "one of the Epstein girls" in a lawsuit against Epstein or his estate, you'd know whether or not she had a NDA (mentioned in your subsequent post) and you'd know its terms. On the other hand, if you did not represent "one of the Epstein girls" in a lawsuit against Epstein or his estate, but you represented her in some other matter, then it's not "odd" in the slightest that she did not discuss Trump -- that would be something she would only mention to her lawyer in the Epstein litigation, and she would be instructed not to tell anyone else. Surely you realize that as her purported lawyer.
Third, contrary to your assertion in a subsequent post ("Possible, but I don't see it as likely"), it would be very likely that anyone settling a lawsuit against Epstein or his estate would have executed a NDA as part of that settlement. She's not going to violate her NDA by telling you stuff you don't need to know. Surely you realize that as a purported lawyer.
Fourth, it's just illogical for anyone to draw conclusions about anything from what someone else did NOT say to them. You could speculate anything on god's green Erf from what you are not told by acquaintances. Jesus Christ, man. Think much?
GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY
I could give a shlt what your skeptical of dunse? challenge me?
I never said I was a lawyer diuchebag, I said she was a client. There are other businesses than lawyers, my God did you just go stupid that quick?
Im sure you also believe, since the Democrats had these Epstein files, and were in the ejection of the century…that they sat on this news? you bet.
Challenge me or be a coward?
110 -
Dunkin is such a know-nothing fake, jealous coward. Believes in God, my *ss. Sunrises in a lawyer, HA! then writes a diatribe of bs. Yiu can have a thousand points of bullshlt. I only need one point of truth, and I have it. Jeezus, you are a clown.
19 -
Noyankee wrote:
Dunkin is such a know-nothing fake, jealous coward. Believes in God, my *ss. Sunrises in a lawyer, HA! then writes a diatribe of bs. Yiu can have a thousand points of bullshlt. I only need one point of truth, and I have it. Jeezus, you are a clown.
Oh dear, poor Noyankee has had an emotional night and went to bed angry and drunk.
The bit where he knew an ‘Epstein girl’ personally and assures us there’s nothing to see in regards to Trump was particularly desperate and sad.
91 -
El Runkin wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
I’ve said this a few times before, but most likely those will not take me seriously, but that would be their downfall, for I am.
I know one of the Epstein girls very well. She is a client of mine, and a prominent one in his circle.
She has not one time mentioned any interactions with Trump, not being at Mar a Lago or even meeting him…so that’s seems a bit odd to me. in fact she years ago told me that she had never met Trump, this soon after she received a large payout from Epstein.
So, I think either Musk is a wounded soldier, or this is he and Trump playing 4D chess.
Take it for what it’s worth, but its fact.
Your story isn't making sense so far, Spuds.
First, it would be very odd/strange for a purported lawyer for one of Epstein's female victims to refer to his client as "one of the Epstein girls." Thus, we are skeptical of your account.
Whoa Runkin...he never said he was a lawyer. She's a "client", which probably means he cuts her lawn.
Not that there's anything wrong with that. It's good, honest work.
81 -
50
-
trollism wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
Dunkin is such a know-nothing fake, jealous coward. Believes in God, my *ss. Sunrises in a lawyer, HA! then writes a diatribe of bs. Yiu can have a thousand points of bullshlt. I only need one point of truth, and I have it. Jeezus, you are a clown.
Oh dear, poor Noyankee has had an emotional night and went to bed angry and drunk.
The bit where he knew an ‘Epstein girl’ personally and assures us there’s nothing to see in regards to Trump was particularly desperate and sad.
He is either the most committed troll I have ever encountered or suffers from serious mental defect. In either case, I don’t think he’s worth engaging.
81 -
Noyankee wrote:
I could give a shlt what your skeptical of dunse? challenge me?
I never said I was a lawyer diuchebag, I said she was a client. There are other businesses than lawyers, my God did you just go stupid that quick?
Challenge me or be a coward?
You could give a sh*t? (And the word you’re looking for is dunce.)
Everyone here became abundantly clear that you’re not a lawyer when you incorrectly claimed due process doesn’t apply to aliens in the US.
Consider yourself challenged and beaten, you f*cking coward.
111 -
08
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.