Trews wrote:
U dont say wrote:
Igy’s wife doesn’t allow him to post much on weekends. And K5’s mother sets similar restrictions.
There’s ample evidence to suggest that they are the same person.
It has already been proven you are touched.
Trews wrote:
U dont say wrote:
Igy’s wife doesn’t allow him to post much on weekends. And K5’s mother sets similar restrictions.
There’s ample evidence to suggest that they are the same person.
It has already been proven you are touched.
Big day coming. Based on Feb i thought that monday could drop, wasn’t worried about the bump on friday.
Fun times, the world will still be here 7 hours from now!
Trews wrote:
U dont say wrote:
Igy’s wife doesn’t allow him to post much on weekends. And K5’s mother sets similar restrictions.
There’s ample evidence to suggest that they are the same person.
Actually no evidence seeing as how it is not so. Igy is Igy and I am the real Uncle B. The Real K5.
I sure do hope that you are posting under several names.
Hate to think that this forum as that many dumb as dirt people on this one thread.
I hope wrote:
Actually no evidence seeing as how it is not so. Igy is Igy and I am the real Uncle B. The Real K5.
Doesn't really matter. Same message, "DOWN GOES THE DOW". SOON-5 years and counting.
I hope wrote:
I sure do hope that you are posting under several names.
Hate to think that this forum as that many dumb as dirt people on this one thread.
Funny. I was thinking the same thing about you.
Holy narrow trading range, Batman!
No index management today! ?
Maserati wrote:
Holy narrow trading range, Batman!
No index management today! ?
Methinks Robin’s tights are cutting off the circulation to his brain.
Actually, I think that it is potentially a very interesting course for them to pursue today, as far as algos are concerned. Smart, I think. Everybody just sit back and take a breather while the immediately recent baseline stabilizes.
If the shoe fits wrote:
I hope wrote:
I sure do hope that you are posting under several names.
Hate to think that this forum as that many dumb as dirt people on this one thread.
Funny. I was thinking the same thing about you.
Maybe one day you guys (or is it one guy?) will come up with your own material instead of using mine.
But I doubt it.
Maserati wrote:
Actually, I think that it is potentially a very interesting course for them to pursue today, as far as algos are concerned. Smart, I think. Everybody just sit back and take a breather while the immediately recent baseline stabilizes.
Immediately recent baseline?
English as a third langauge?
Think about it, you glib and boring moran.
——————————
Another good day, down a few points as I predicted...however, I thought the drop would be greater. I have to look at specifics and at volume, hard to know what to make of today in light of last week.
Some set of words wrote:
Maserati wrote:
Actually, I think that it is potentially a very interesting course for them to pursue today, as far as algos are concerned. Smart, I think. Everybody just sit back and take a breather while the immediately recent baseline stabilizes.
Immediately recent baseline?
English as a third langauge?
This post is from the guy who criticizes the language skills of others. Where’s that irony guy when you need him?
Oh no you dint wrote:
Some set of words wrote:
Immediately recent baseline?
English as a third langauge?
This post is from the guy who criticizes the language skills of others. Where’s that irony guy when you need him?
Language skills?
What's with you guys adding the word skills everywhere it does not belong?
God you are so stupid.
[quote]Oh no you dint wrote:
Immediately recent baseline.
Simply awesome.
Skillz? wrote:
Oh no you dint wrote:
This post is from the guy who criticizes the language skills of others. Where’s that irony guy when you need him?
Language skills?
What's with you guys adding the word skills everywhere it does not belong?
God you are so stupid.
This is a textbook example of doubling down on stupid.
Standby for the triple.
Still waiting wrote:
agip wrote:
have it your way. You keep believing that a VIX over 32ish is not predictive of a stock market bottom. You do you.
Still waiting for any evidence at all to actually back this claim up. This counter-intuitive claim. At best.
just a coincidence that the VIX high was on October 12, at 26.80
and that the SP500 low was on October 11 at 2710
just a wild, random occurence. A spiking VIX has nothing to do with a falling stock market. No connection.
Is that what you are really trying to say? If so, do you change your mind now?
because this is just trading 101. When the market falls sharply, the VIX climbs. One pretty good way to feel good about market timing is to do some buying when the VIX gets up to pretty high levels. Lately that has been around 30. Usually 32 but this isn't a formula.
