Hi. Me again.
What is football?
Hi. Me again.
What is football?
Holy shit you're alive. I thought you got too drunk saturday night and walked off a cliff or something.
dial it up wrote:
Holy shit you're alive. I thought you got too drunk saturday night and walked off a cliff or something.
I don't drink. I had to endure that bullsh!t sober.
I have to say I think it is a race issue why so many are under-rating Russell Wilson.
dial it up wrote:
Seer wrote:Both of you must be blind as bats. There is not a single GM in the NFL who would rather have Tony Romo than Russell Wilson at QB. Not one.
1) Neither of us were discussing either player dumbsh!t.
2)
Player A:
QB rating: 114.4
Yards: 3,406
Y/Att: 8.49
TD/INT: 32/8
Com %: 70.3
H2H: Win 30-23
Sacked: 29
Player B:
QB rating: 95.7
Yards: 3,236
Y/Att: 7.58
TD/INT: 20/6
Com %: 62.8
H2H: Loss 23-30
Sacked: 39
Now tell me which one you would prefer?
Typical of someone who does not understand football. Let me guess, the closest you ever came to actually playing the game was when you were on your HS marching band and got to strut your stuff at the halftime show. Am I right?
JustSayin wrote:
I have to say I think it is a race issue why so many are under-rating Russell Wilson.
Well, in that case, you are a first class dumbαss.
Played in college my man. Feel free to fill me in your experiences.
If not, it is also okay to admit you didn't expect me to make you look stupid for picking player B over player A and admit you don't have a rebuttal so you went with "you dont understand football."
dial it up wrote:
Played in college my man. Feel free to fill me in your experiences.
If not, it is also okay to admit you didn't expect me to make you look stupid for picking player B over player A and admit you don't have a rebuttal so you went with "you dont understand football."
I'm assuming rushing yards don't matter at all to you. You are proving your idiocy time and time again.
Can't come up with one? I'll help. It is because you have a pre-conceived notion that you like Wilson better. So you interject yourself into threads to spew your ignorant opinion despite not having any real knowledge of the situation, only your ever so valuable opinion. Thus, when someone proves you wrong, you are unable to see facts. Instead you resort to pathetic accusations based on even less fact that your original dumb*ss opinion.
Butt... wrote:
dial it up wrote:Played in college my man. Feel free to fill me in your experiences.
If not, it is also okay to admit you didn't expect me to make you look stupid for picking player B over player A and admit you don't have a rebuttal so you went with "you dont understand football."
I'm assuming rushing yards don't matter at all to you. You are proving your idiocy time and time again.
So out of ALL of those numbers for a QUARTERBACK, rush yards are what you think is the most important statistic? Go sit with your buddy in the dumb*ss corner.
dial it up wrote:
Butt... wrote:I'm assuming rushing yards don't matter at all to you. You are proving your idiocy time and time again.
So out of ALL of those numbers for a QUARTERBACK, rush yards are what you think is the most important statistic? Go sit with your buddy in the dumb*ss corner.
Nope, but you conveniently leave out the effect of one of Wilson's greatest assets. It's an aspect that many believe make him a better quarterback than Romo.
The ghost of Roger Staubach wrote:
What are the chances that this season Romo finally gets his December-January record above .500?
I believe he needs 3 more wins to do it this season. It's certainly possible, but I'll take the under.
dial it up wrote:
Can't come up with one? I'll help. It is because you have a pre-conceived notion that you like Wilson better. So you interject yourself into threads to spew your ignorant opinion despite not having any real knowledge of the situation, only your ever so valuable opinion. Thus, when someone proves you wrong, you are unable to see facts. Instead you resort to pathetic accusations based on even less fact that your original dumb*ss opinion.
Wow, so now you are replying to your own posts! Must of hit pretty darn close to the mark. So, you really never did get closer than when you were on your HS marching band and got to strut your stuff at the halftime show.
LOL
What makes Seattle special right now is synergy. In a matter of a few minutes in the fourth quarter last night, Lynch, Wilson and Sherman had plays which would be lifetime highlights for most any player in the NFL. They just fed off each other's mojo to put the game away in a fell swoop. They are no longer just a great defense with a "game manager" on offense: Russell blew away everyone else this week for fantasy points (36 to Romo's 27).
That said, I love the prospect of a NFC matchup with the Cowboys.
Butt... wrote:
dial it up wrote:So out of ALL of those numbers for a QUARTERBACK, rush yards are what you think is the most important statistic? Go sit with your buddy in the dumb*ss corner.
Nope, but you conveniently leave out the effect of one of Wilson's greatest assets. It's an aspect that many believe make him a better quarterback than Romo.
Ok that's fair enough, add the rushing yards to those lists and tell me who you choose. It still doesn't change anything.
Seer wrote:
dial it up wrote:Can't come up with one? I'll help. It is because you have a pre-conceived notion that you like Wilson better. So you interject yourself into threads to spew your ignorant opinion despite not having any real knowledge of the situation, only your ever so valuable opinion. Thus, when someone proves you wrong, you are unable to see facts. Instead you resort to pathetic accusations based on even less fact that your original dumb*ss opinion.
Wow, so now you are replying to your own posts! Must of hit pretty darn close to the mark. So, you really never did get closer than when you were on your HS marching band and got to strut your stuff at the halftime show.
LOL
Yea dude you nailed it. I'm gonna leave you in your corner until you come up with something that has any sort of substance.
Did you actually just type "lol?"
Dial it up wrote:
Seer wrote:Wow, so now you are replying to your own posts! Must of hit pretty darn close to the mark. So, you really never did get closer than when you were on your HS marching band and got to strut your stuff at the halftime show.
LOL
Yea dude you nailed it. I'm gonna leave you in your corner until you come up with something that has any sort of substance.
Did you actually just type "lol?"
Did you really just type "leave you in your corner"? Wow, sorry I commented on your HS marching band experience. You haven't even gotten there yet. Hope you graduate from 6th grade successfully.
Cheers.
No.
Seer wrote:
Dial it up wrote:Yea dude you nailed it. I'm gonna leave you in your corner until you come up with something that has any sort of substance.
Did you actually just type "lol?"
Did you really just type "leave you in your corner"? Wow, sorry I commented on your HS marching band experience. You haven't even gotten there yet. Hope you graduate from 6th grade successfully.
Cheers.
I wasn't in the marching band, bud. I was part of the football program. I couldn't play because of my asthma, but I was at every practice and game. Every good program needs managers, ball boys, etc.
DiaI it up wrote:
Seer wrote:Did you really just type "leave you in your corner"? Wow, sorry I commented on your HS marching band experience. You haven't even gotten there yet. Hope you graduate from 6th grade successfully.
Cheers.
I wasn't in the marching band, bud. I was part of the football program. I couldn't play because of my asthma, but I was at every practice and game. Every good program needs managers, ball boys, etc.
Glad to know educating the forum gets a guy some groupies, I'll take it.