The only thing that is "for sure" here is that you are a m*ron who can't use basic English.
It was an easy prediction.
For sure you can win when playing Roulette, is it a given? For sure not.
If it isn't a given it isn't for sure. It is the opposite. It isn't for sure. One day you might learn about contradiction. But it wouldn't be for sure.
Do you have deadly diseases? No? Then for sure you can reach the age of 80. But - for sure - it's not a given, - you can be killed tomorrow by some accident.
For sure you understand this - but you just have to give contra, it's the meaning of your life.
So just continue (what you undoubtedly will).
The only thing that is "for sure" here is that you are a m*ron who can't use basic English.
How many languages do you speak, dumbo? Yeah, I thought so.
Do you have deadly diseases? No? Then for sure you can reach the age of 80. But - for sure - it's not a given, - you can be killed tomorrow by some accident.
For sure you understand this - but you just have to give contra, it's the meaning of your life.
So just continue (what you undoubtedly will).
The only thing that is "for sure" here is that you are a m*ron who can't use basic English.
When even he himself understands why he is so extremely wrong, he starts hurling insults.
Maybe I'm wrong, and he really still doesn't understand.
Please, for the love of god, shut up. Ingy is 5/5 in going out for records and getting them. if he sets up an event for whatever record, he's very likely going to get it. I literally remember you saying wouldn't sniff the 3k record. Why does anyone respond to this guy.
Please, for the love of god, shut up. Ingy is 5/5 in going out for records and getting them. if he sets up an event for whatever record, he's very likely going to get it. I literally remember you saying wouldn't sniff the 3k record. Why does anyone respond to this guy.
You are way too optimistic -breaking WRs being severely plagued with recurring injuries isn’t something that is a given…
The question here is if Jakob can change his training or life style in a way that aligns with a healthy body without adjusting the quality, quantity and energy so much that his performances suffer when in peak shape.
So what can he do.:
1. Less training on the regular treadmill.
2. Less training on asphalt and other hard surfaces.
3. Less competitions (especially the indoor champs, but maybe even the Outdoor Euros.)
4. Strength work on Achilles/Calves.
5. Give the injuries more time to heal (no champs without being fully recovered).
Do I think he could do some of these changes? Yes. (At least theoretically). Do I think that would do the trick, without reducing his WR plans? Maybe. But if this isn’t enough, he might eventually do even deeper changes, without compromising his quality. So for now I choose to have hope…
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
Please, for the love of god, shut up. Ingy is 5/5 in going out for records and getting them. if he sets up an event for whatever record, he's very likely going to get it. I literally remember you saying wouldn't sniff the 3k record. Why does anyone respond to this guy.
Did you pick how he was going to do in his main event in Paris? Did you pick that he was going to get injured again last year? Did you pick his failure to qualify in the 1500 at the worlds and coming 10th defending his title in the 5k? Life must be a continual series of shocks to you. Next year will probably be one of them.
Please, for the love of god, shut up. Ingy is 5/5 in going out for records and getting them. if he sets up an event for whatever record, he's very likely going to get it. I literally remember you saying wouldn't sniff the 3k record. Why does anyone respond to this guy.
You are way too optimistic -breaking WRs being severely plagued with recurring injuries isn’t something that is a given…
The question here is if Jakob can change his training or life style in a way that aligns with a healthy body without adjusting the quality, quantity and energy so much that his performances suffer when in peak shape.
So what can he do.:
1. Less training on the regular treadmill.
2. Less training on asphalt and other hard surfaces.
3. Less competitions (especially the indoor champs, but maybe even the Outdoor Euros.)
4. Strength work on Achilles/Calves.
5. Give the injuries more time to heal (no champs without being fully recovered).
Do I think he could do some of these changes? Yes. (At least theoretically). Do I think that would do the trick, without reducing his WR plans? Maybe. But if this isn’t enough, he might eventually do even deeper changes, without compromising his quality. So for now I choose to have hope…
You're trying to reason with the equivalent of Bible-basher.
For sure you can win when playing Roulette, is it a given? For sure not.
If it isn't a given it isn't for sure. It is the opposite. It isn't for sure. One day you might learn about contradiction. But it wouldn't be for sure.
When you play Roulett, for sure you can win.
Everybody, including 8 years old children, understand this sentence.
But not our friend from New Zealand - it's way beyond his limit.
You are way too optimistic -breaking WRs being severely plagued with recurring injuries isn’t something that is a given…
The question here is if Jakob can change his training or life style in a way that aligns with a healthy body without adjusting the quality, quantity and energy so much that his performances suffer when in peak shape.
So what can he do.:
1. Less training on the regular treadmill.
2. Less training on asphalt and other hard surfaces.
3. Less competitions (especially the indoor champs, but maybe even the Outdoor Euros.)
4. Strength work on Achilles/Calves.
5. Give the injuries more time to heal (no champs without being fully recovered).
Do I think he could do some of these changes? Yes. (At least theoretically). Do I think that would do the trick, without reducing his WR plans? Maybe. But if this isn’t enough, he might eventually do even deeper changes, without compromising his quality. So for now I choose to have hope…
You're trying to reason with the equivalent of Bible-basher.
You two in your little echo chamber make a cute pair.
You two in your little echo chamber make a cute pair.
Sure. But I think we two aren’t the only ones that think Jakob’s injuries might end his career. And even if Armstronglivs and I differ a little when it comes to the details here, this may even be only a theoretical disagreement, because I’m not sure Jakob has it in him to do the right adjustments, even if they’re theoretically available…
I have always thought that Jakob has an extraordinary running ability that he step by step is unveiling, year after year. And the seasons 2023 and 2024 made me even more confident of him being a future WR threat, at least in a couple of more events (yes maybe several). And I didn’t see his injuries as a threat here (they were simply not severe enough). But the following situation may have changed all that:
1. Jakob seems to have a personality that doesn’t align good with avoiding injuries -it’s extremely important to him to shine almost outer earthly. But his risk taking can therefore also become outer earthly….
2. Both Jakob’s Achilles injuries have come without any bodily warnings. That makes them extremely hard to avoid, even with the right kind of careful personality.
3. Jakob really needs good running results to overshadow the strain from the family conflict he is in. That might make him too impatient when it comes to stretching the string…
4. I have no doubts about Jakob’s huge potential. But he’s not the only one, and very few get to realise all of it. Again the Goat Bekele is a good example: Prior to, and also after, his 2.01.41, I think he easily could have broken the Marathon WR, and maybe also the HM, but injuries messed up all his hard efforts.
Can Jakob come back? Theoretically -clearly. But I have to admit (and repeat) that I for now have dropped the positive theories, and refrain to hope alone…
You two in your little echo chamber make a cute pair.
Sure. But I think we two aren’t the only ones that think Jakob’s injuries might end his career. And even if Armstronglivs and I differ a little when it comes to the details here, this may even be only a theoretical disagreement, because I’m not sure Jakob has it in him to do the right adjustments, even if they’re theoretically available…
I have always thought that Jakob has an extraordinary running ability that he step by step is unveiling, year after year. And the seasons 2023 and 2024 made me even more confident of him being a future WR threat, at least in a couple of more events (yes maybe several). And I didn’t see his injuries as a threat here (they were simply not severe enough). But the following situation may have changed all that:
1. Jakob seems to have a personality that doesn’t align good with avoiding injuries -it’s extremely important to him to shine almost outer earthly. But his risk taking can therefore also become outer earthly….
2. Both Jakob’s Achilles injuries have come without any bodily warnings. That makes them extremely hard to avoid, even with the right kind of careful personality.
3. Jakob really needs good running results to overshadow the strain from the family conflict he is in. That might make him too impatient when it comes to stretching the string…
4. I have no doubts about Jakob’s huge potential. But he’s not the only one, and very few get to realise all of it. Again the Goat Bekele is a good example: Prior to, and also after, his 2.01.41, I think he easily could have broken the Marathon WR, and maybe also the HM, but injuries messed up all his hard efforts.
Can Jakob come back? Theoretically -clearly. But I have to admit (and repeat) that I for now have dropped the positive theories, and refrain to hope alone…
You are always arguing against something nobody has ever questioned.
Why no comment from you to the fact that your friend can't understand what "for sure ... can happen..." means?
It really needs a very special character to defend the nonsense which Armstronglivs posts again and again. You are a very special character.
You are always arguing against something nobody has ever questioned.
Why no comment from you to the fact that your friend can't understand what "for sure ... can happen..." means?
It really needs a very special character to defend the nonsense which Armstronglivs posts again and again. You are a very special character.
I argued against a poster that claimed that Jakob always gets the WRs he “officially” is going after, and that he therefore almost automatically will break 3 new ones…
So to the semantics: If you prefer to focus on the semantic stuff, quarrelling, and going after the person instead of the ball, that’s fine by me. But I’m interested in the sport, and not your perspective.
And this “your friend Armstronglivs” -sure, there’s a lot about him I like. But also about others. That doesn’t mean that he and I agree on everything; we clearly don’t. But as I have stressed: This is only sport (important enough for the athletes of course), and I have also underlined that in almost every disagreement I have with Armstronglivs I might be wrong and he right -I’m not very knowledgeable in this field, and am here also to learn and evolve. In addition to the fact that it’s fun to read/ trying to express one self in, the world language English.
You are always arguing against something nobody has ever questioned.
Why no comment from you to the fact that your friend can't understand what "for sure ... can happen..." means?
It really needs a very special character to defend the nonsense which Armstronglivs posts again and again. You are a very special character.
I argued against a poster that claimed that Jakob always gets the WRs he “officially” is going after, and that he therefore almost automatically will break 3 new ones…
So to the semantics: If you prefer to focus on the semantic stuff, quarrelling, and going after the person instead of the ball, that’s fine by me. But I’m interested in the sport, and not your perspective.
And this “your friend Armstronglivs” -sure, there’s a lot about him I like. But also about others. That doesn’t mean that he and I agree on everything; we clearly don’t. But as I have stressed: This is only sport (important enough for the athletes of course), and I have also underlined that in almost every disagreement I have with Armstronglivs I might be wrong and he right -I’m not very knowledgeable in this field, and am here also to learn and evolve. In addition to the fact that it’s fun to read/ trying to express one self in, the world language English.
No, in most issues he not "might be wrong". He is. A fact.
He can't understand such an easy claim as "for sure... you can". Just an example of many.
But write more long essays why it's not a given that Jakob will break another (or three) WR(s).
That's obvious and nobody apart from 1 poster has said otherwise.
Again: are his chances (for 1 or 3 records, that's unimportant) ABOUT ZERO as your friend claims?
Small hint for you: don't start your answer again with IF. The first time it already showed that you are stupid. Try to learn.
If it isn't a given it isn't for sure. It is the opposite. It isn't for sure. One day you might learn about contradiction. But it wouldn't be for sure.
When you play Roulett, for sure you can win.
Everybody, including 8 years old children, understand this sentence.
But not our friend from New Zealand - it's way beyond his limit.
This shows you don't understand English. Nothing is "for sure" when you play roulette; that is what chance means. It is the opposite of "for sure".