""" Once the dust settles from the NCAA v. House settlement, with the final hearing scheduled for April 2025, a new binding document between a school and student-athlete will need to be created with the introduction of the new revenue-sharing model"""
So no more NLI but something similar will take it's place.
I am curious to find out what happens between now and 'when the dust settles'?
Class of 2025 hasn’t signed a NLI yet anyways. They haven’t reconsidered to get to altitude because they don’t want to. It’s not exactly new info that FSU and NC State are not at altitude
Everything is a big deal right now until proven otherwise. Expect a solution that eases football litigation headaches and is good for SEC/Big10 football but doesn’t include track/XC recruiting logic at all.
No, to the turd-attitude that deleted my post which was evidently quite caustic to their disposition, I’ll repeat it:
MAYBE THIS RULING WILL BE ADDED EMPHASIS FOR SADIE AND RYLEE TO RETHINK THEIR CURRENT SCHOOL SELECTION SO THAT THEY CAN INSTEAD GET TO ALTITUDE (even if that would mean Adams State.)
No, to the turd-attitude that deleted my post which was evidently quite caustic to their disposition, I’ll repeat it:
MAYBE THIS RULING WILL BE ADDED EMPHASIS FOR SADIE AND RYLEE TO RETHINK THEIR CURRENT SCHOOL SELECTION SO THAT THEY CAN INSTEAD GET TO ALTITUDE (even if that would mean Adams State.)
😊😝
Your post got deleted so you thought you'd post the same nonsense again?You're missing a few screws. This ruling has ZERO to do with going to a school at altitude.
And Rylee Blade just made her decision a few weeks ago. She's not going to be changing her mind already.
Everything is a big deal right now until proven otherwise. Expect a solution that eases football litigation headaches and is good for SEC/Big10 football but doesn’t include track/XC recruiting logic at all.
Can't disagree if you put it that way. lol
But there will still be a contract that gets signed if you get a scholarship it just will be slightly different.