I wonder if this boycott will work as well as the right wing boycotts of NFL, Keurig, Nordstroms, Kelloggs, Target, M&M's Disney and Beyonce...
Those are all bankrupt aren't they?
But then again, they did not have a mental giant powerhouse like Kid rock shooting at their product. So we will see.
Kaepernick still is unemployed. He would be eating out of a dumpster except Nike bailed him out.
Someone already posted about Gillette earlier, but I know I switched to Harry's and have never looked back.
Disney lost their CEO, is down 26% over 52 weeks, and are now in a protracted legal battle with the state of Florida. I wouldn't consider that a win.
Still, the difference between those brands and Budweiser is that Budweiser is a predominantly conservative product. This will hurt Budweiser much more than rednecks refusing to buy M&Ms.
We should never underestimate the way Trumpers mistakenly believe that they represent the majority of the country when it is a tiny fraction. I am sure Gillette is still sore from losing as a customer to Harrys.
But I appreciate the way that you skillfully said that Budweiser is a beer for Conservatives. What you really meant is that Budweiser is a beer for slack jaw, Nascar loving, gun toting hillbillies. Trust me. Wall Street Conservatives are not drinking Budweiser nor following Kid Rock's lead
Kaepernick still is unemployed. He would be eating out of a dumpster except Nike bailed him out.
Someone already posted about Gillette earlier, but I know I switched to Harry's and have never looked back.
Disney lost their CEO, is down 26% over 52 weeks, and are now in a protracted legal battle with the state of Florida. I wouldn't consider that a win.
Still, the difference between those brands and Budweiser is that Budweiser is a predominantly conservative product. This will hurt Budweiser much more than rednecks refusing to buy M&Ms.
We should never underestimate the way Trumpers mistakenly believe that they represent the majority of the country when it is a tiny fraction. I am sure Gillette is still sore from losing as a customer to Harrys.
But I appreciate the way that you skillfully said that Budweiser is a beer for Conservatives. What you really meant is that Budweiser is a beer for slack jaw, Nascar loving, gun toting hillbillies. Trust me. Wall Street Conservatives are not drinking Budweiser nor following Kid Rock's lead
But you do you.
Never underestimate the violence of the triggered trannies who mass shoot people, the groomers who promote drag shows and the out-of-touch Hollyweird left that the dems enthusiastically support.
Kaepernick still is unemployed. He would be eating out of a dumpster except Nike bailed him out.
Someone already posted about Gillette earlier, but I know I switched to Harry's and have never looked back.
Disney lost their CEO, is down 26% over 52 weeks, and are now in a protracted legal battle with the state of Florida. I wouldn't consider that a win.
Still, the difference between those brands and Budweiser is that Budweiser is a predominantly conservative product. This will hurt Budweiser much more than rednecks refusing to buy M&Ms.
But I appreciate the way that you skillfully said that Budweiser is a beer for Conservatives. What you really meant is that Budweiser is a beer for slack jaw, Nascar loving, gun toting hillbillies. Trust me. Wall Street Conservatives are not drinking Budweiser nor following Kid Rock's lead
But you do you.
Put simply, you're wrong.
I've already seen one article about restaurants in NYC being unable to sell product. I guess NYC must be full of slack jaw, NASCAR loving, gun toting hillbillies?
Hey, maybe Jussie Smollett WAS telling the truth when he said he was assailed by rednecks claiming Chicago was "M A G A COUNTRY." Big Dem cities must be a hotbed for hillbillies right now...
I've already seen one article about restaurants in NYC being unable to sell product. I guess NYC must be full of slack jaw, NASCAR loving, gun toting hillbillies?
Hey, maybe Jussie Smollett WAS telling the truth when he said he was assailed by rednecks claiming Chicago was "M A G A COUNTRY." Big Dem cities must be a hotbed for hillbillies right now...
Post the article, please.
Conservative are losers. They'll continue to lose bigly as they move further and further into insanity.
AB stock already down another 2% this morning, hitting 2 new levels of support in 2 days.
What was BUD stock low price in the past 52 weeks? What percentage is it up or down for the year?
The year-low was $44 in November, but since February of this year it went on a steep uptrend from $57 all the way to $67, where it took a steep dip right after the Mulvaney ad. So they're still up from last year but the Mulvaney ad reversed the huge uptrend they were on by $4 so far.
What was BUD stock low price in the past 52 weeks? What percentage is it up or down for the year?
The year-low was $44 in November, but since February of this year it went on a steep uptrend from $57 all the way to $67, where it took a steep dip right after the Mulvaney ad. So they're still up from last year but the Mulvaney ad reversed the huge uptrend they were on by $4 so far.
The year-low was $44 in November, but since February of this year it went on a steep uptrend from $57 all the way to $67, where it took a steep dip right after the Mulvaney ad. So they're still up from last year but the Mulvaney ad reversed the huge uptrend they were on by $4 so far.
But why?
Many of those out there who don't think transgenderism and Gender ideology should be normalized. It's pretty simple, really.
Many of those out there who don't think transgenderism and Gender ideology should be normalized. It's pretty simple, really.
How is it promoting gender ideology? It's not political, they want some exposure on TikTok and she has a billion channel views. It sounds like most of the boycotters want Bud Light to become political and explicitly exclude working with trans people.
Many of those out there who don't think transgenderism and Gender ideology should be normalized. It's pretty simple, really.
How is it promoting gender ideology? It's not political, they want some exposure on TikTok and she has a billion channel views. It sounds like most of the boycotters want Bud Light to become political and explicitly exclude working with trans people.
It was to celebrate his "365 days of womanhood," which is implicitly supportive of the ideology which states men can be women. They chose to celebrate mental illness and destructive ideologies and they got burned. And no, the opposite, I think most would rather companies remain apolitical, or at least not promote Gender theory and other bizarre woke ideologies.
How is it promoting gender ideology? It's not political, they want some exposure on TikTok and she has a billion channel views. It sounds like most of the boycotters want Bud Light to become political and explicitly exclude working with trans people.
It was to celebrate his "365 days of womanhood," which is implicitly supportive of the ideology which states men can be women. They chose to celebrate mental illness and destructive ideologies and they got burned. And no, the opposite, I think most would rather companies remain apolitical, or at least not promote Gender theory and other bizarre woke ideologies.
This. Nobody cared if a trans enjoyed a bud light. AB decided they had to come out and choose a side. Let's see how it pans out.
The right wingers have had many Boycotts in the past. I can't think of any that have ever materialized to mean anything beyond 15 minutes of shelf life on Tucker, Hannity, Ingrahm. You see, right wingers are more keyboard warriors and not so much action takers.
Yet, I am sure this one will work for them as this poster seams to believe.
Exactly. Remember when they tried to boycott Nike. Now they want to boycott the best selling beer in America. Good luck with that.
How is it promoting gender ideology? It's not political, they want some exposure on TikTok and she has a billion channel views. It sounds like most of the boycotters want Bud Light to become political and explicitly exclude working with trans people.
It was to celebrate his "365 days of womanhood," which is implicitly supportive of the ideology which states men can be women. They chose to celebrate mental illness and destructive ideologies and they got burned. And no, the opposite, I think most would rather companies remain apolitical, or at least not promote Gender theory and other bizarre woke ideologies.
By any reasonable metric Mulvaney is someone any company would want to associate with. She has a billion channel views and 10 million subscribers.
If you want them to be neutral then that would mean ignoring the fact she's trans and working with her. If you want them to overlook her phenomenal amount of followers and refuse to work with her because she's trans, THAT is political.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.