There are plenty of other studies to corroborate if you are at all savvy to research such things. It is simple biological fact that the vegan diet is insufficient for most people across a wide variety of nutrients.
Lmao. You’re gonna turn this into a vegan thing.
This guy sees TV static 24/7 and horrifically murders 4 college kids and you say it’s because he eats carrots.
If only he ate cheeseburgers and medium rare steaks this all could have been avoided.
See, that was his ultimate plan - he was working his way up to killings in which he was going to cannabilize his victims to finally "cure" his condition.
I read that he waived his right to a speedy trial to give attorneys more time to build a case....aka he's guilty and he knows it.
It's rare that a defendant does not waive their right to a speedy trial. So, this doesn't really mean anything.
It does mean something. The defendant supposedly knows the process better than average. If a defendant is out on O.R. or if a defendant has raised bail money, sure, waive right to speedy trial. Keep your freedom as long as possible. 100% innocent gals or guys may want to waive speedy trial to give their private investigators time to find the real killer. This simply gives all attorneys a break. All attorneys can pace themselves. None of you have said how waiving speedy trial in this case helps this defendant.
It's rare that a defendant does not waive their right to a speedy trial. So, this doesn't really mean anything.
It does mean something. The defendant supposedly knows the process better than average. If a defendant is out on O.R. or if a defendant has raised bail money, sure, waive right to speedy trial. Keep your freedom as long as possible. 100% innocent gals or guys may want to waive speedy trial to give their private investigators time to find the real killer. This simply gives all attorneys a break. All attorneys can pace themselves. None of you have said how waiving speedy trial in this case helps this defendant.
A common reason is to give your attorney as much time to prepare as possible (i.e., reduce the chances of conviction). This was likely done under the advice of his attorney.
You are repeating my words back to me and pretending you are stating something profound. Of course waiving right to speedy trial was after being advised to do so by his attorneys. Of course waiving right to speedy trial is for the convenience of attorneys, ALL ATTORNEYS, both sides. It only works if the defendant is 100% innocent. Burden of Proof is on the government. The government loves to have more time to dig into a defendant's background. Ninety-nine percent of you on this thread are pro-prosecution zealots but now you all are praising defense team for waiving right to speedy trial?
You are repeating my words back to me and pretending you are stating something profound. Of course waiving right to speedy trial was after being advised to do so by his attorneys. Of course waiving right to speedy trial is for the convenience of attorneys, ALL ATTORNEYS, both sides. It only works if the defendant is 100% innocent. Burden of Proof is on the government. The government loves to have more time to dig into a defendant's background. Ninety-nine percent of you on this thread are pro-prosecution zealots but now you all are praising defense team for waiving right to speedy trial?
The prosecution already has enough and doesn’t need additional time.
You are repeating my words back to me and pretending you are stating something profound. Of course waiving right to speedy trial was after being advised to do so by his attorneys. Of course waiving right to speedy trial is for the convenience of attorneys, ALL ATTORNEYS, both sides. It only works if the defendant is 100% innocent. Burden of Proof is on the government. The government loves to have more time to dig into a defendant's background. Ninety-nine percent of you on this thread are pro-prosecution zealots but now you all are praising defense team for waiving right to speedy trial?
The prosecution already has enough and doesn’t need additional time.
You don't know that. Have prosecutors in ID turned over Discovery to you? Don't make stuff up.
There are plenty of other studies to corroborate if you are at all savvy to research such things. It is simple biological fact that the vegan diet is insufficient for most people across a wide variety of nutrients.
Evidence means a peer reviewed double blind paper published in an established journal. Not a YouTube video.
You are repeating my words back to me and pretending you are stating something profound. Of course waiving right to speedy trial was after being advised to do so by his attorneys. Of course waiving right to speedy trial is for the convenience of attorneys, ALL ATTORNEYS, both sides. It only works if the defendant is 100% innocent. Burden of Proof is on the government. The government loves to have more time to dig into a defendant's background. Ninety-nine percent of you on this thread are pro-prosecution zealots but now you all are praising defense team for waiving right to speedy trial?
The prosecution already has enough and doesn’t need additional time.
Law enforcement/prosecution only got possession of Kohberger's car (in Pennsylvania) and all the evidence in his apartment two weeks ago. They have not had time to process all that evidence, nor would they if this went to trial in two weeks. They would be limited to the evidence described in the Affidavit, which is not a position that prosecution wants to be in. They want or present the full story at trial.
The prosecuting attorney (Bill "Santa" Thompson) not only had no objection to the defense request for a preliminary hearing in June, but actually asked for a hearing in July 2023 instead. The prosecution has an enormous amount of evidence to process and develop.
The prosecution already has enough and doesn’t need additional time.
Law enforcement/prosecution only got possession of Kohberger's car (in Pennsylvania) and all the evidence in his apartment two weeks ago. They have not had time to process all that evidence, nor would they if this went to trial in two weeks. They would be limited to the evidence described in the Affidavit, which is not a position that prosecution wants to be in. They want or present the full story at trial.
The prosecuting attorney (Bill "Santa" Thompson) not only had no objection to the defense request for a preliminary hearing in June, but actually asked for a hearing in July 2023 instead. The prosecution has an enormous amount of evidence to process and develop.
Maybe you’re right, but it will just be overkill. There is no possible explanation for Kohberger’s DNA being on a knife sheaf at the crime scene other than him being the murderer.
You are repeating my words back to me and pretending you are stating something profound. Of course waiving right to speedy trial was after being advised to do so by his attorneys. Of course waiving right to speedy trial is for the convenience of attorneys, ALL ATTORNEYS, both sides. It only works if the defendant is 100% innocent. Burden of Proof is on the government. The government loves to have more time to dig into a defendant's background. Ninety-nine percent of you on this thread are pro-prosecution zealots but now you all are praising defense team for waiving right to speedy trial?
Your two posts on the speedy trial waiver issue are jumbled and confusing. You are arguing against things no one said, stating opinions with clearly erroneous premises, jumping around from one unrelated idea to another, and only vaguely suggesting what your ultimate point may be.
If your point was that it was not in Kohberger's best interests to waive his right to a speedy trial, and he only did so because his lawyers failed to adequately represent him, that would be a pretty unsupportable position. There are reasons that criminal defendants in the US almost always waive their rights to a speedy trial, and it is not because they get hoodwinked into it by their lawyers. In general, delays almost always benefit a defendant - witness memories fade, evidence gets corrupted or lost, witnesses die or move, etc., and it gives their lawyers more time to review and analyze evidence that the prosecution has had practically unlimited access to for a relatively long period of time.
Kohberger's lawyers are professionals and doing their best in a very difficult case that was filed very recently. They have an enormous amount of evidence to review and analyze just from the Affidavit alone, and they only met Kohberger for the first time on January 5th. If this case were to go to trial in two weeks (speedy), Kohberger's lawyers would be completely winging it with little knowledge of the facts, barely even knowing Kohberger himself, and almost no strategy.
I have no idea what you are going on about. Guilty or innocent, given the gravity of the charges and possibility of the death penalty, it would be foolish to rush to trial.
The prosecutor's will need time to analyze evidence from BK's car and apartment. Then they can put everything they have together and build a case. Supposedly the forensic stuff can take 6 weeks, so at least a little bit of time is helpful to them. If there is victim DNA in his car or apartment, the case is so strong I'm not sure they would even accept a plea bargain. I live in Idaho, and not only are people very pro death penalty here, but I've heard two different people say this case changed their attitude on the death penalty and think he deserves it. Even my hardcore Christian friend who is one of the most compassionate persons I've ever met said he deserves the death penalty. People here do not want this guy to live.
The prosecutor's will need time to analyze evidence from BK's car and apartment. Then they can put everything they have together and build a case. Supposedly the forensic stuff can take 6 weeks, so at least a little bit of time is helpful to them. If there is victim DNA in his car or apartment, the case is so strong I'm not sure they would even accept a plea bargain. I live in Idaho, and not only are people very pro death penalty here, but I've heard two different people say this case changed their attitude on the death penalty and think he deserves it. Even my hardcore Christian friend who is one of the most compassionate persons I've ever met said he deserves the death penalty. People here do not want this guy to live.
Kohberger’s DNA being on the knife shield found next to one of the victims, closes the deal and there will be no plea bargain. If he doesn’t deserve the death penalty, then probably no one dies.
The prosecutor's will need time to analyze evidence from BK's car and apartment. Then they can put everything they have together and build a case. Supposedly the forensic stuff can take 6 weeks, so at least a little bit of time is helpful to them. If there is victim DNA in his car or apartment, the case is so strong I'm not sure they would even accept a plea bargain. I live in Idaho, and not only are people very pro death penalty here, but I've heard two different people say this case changed their attitude on the death penalty and think he deserves it. Even my hardcore Christian friend who is one of the most compassionate persons I've ever met said he deserves the death penalty. People here do not want this guy to live.
Kohberger’s DNA being on the knife shield found next to one of the victims, closes the deal and there will be no plea bargain. If he doesn’t deserve the death penalty, then probably no one dies.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.